Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1025-00258
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/24/2025 | NPPO Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 11/18/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-1025-00258 ADDRESS/PARCEL: (9015 E TANQUE VERDE RD TUCSON, AZ 85749) COMMENTS 1. Please show the RIM elevation of the nearest upstream manhole on the utility plan. Based on the sewer connection shown, the nearest upstream manhole appears to be MH #4850-03 (based on Pima Maps). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018 2. Also, the RIM elevation of the nearest upstream manhole (MH #4850-03) is approximately 60.48 per the public sewer improvement plans on Pima Maps. The building’s FFE is more than 12 inches above this elevation; therefore, a backwater valve is not required. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
||
| 11/12/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 4350 E. Irvington Road Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 November 11, 2025 WO#T167976 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: CIRCLE K TANQUE VERDE and CATALINA HWY TD-DEV-1025-00258 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and cannot approve the development plan submitted 10/30/2025. There are existing facilities within the development which are not depicted upon the plan. Junction box AZB-3 is not depicted on the utility plans and appears to be in conflict with the trash enclosure. Further: TEP existing 10' easement - Docket-6529 Page-916 must be shown on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Martin Rodriguez (520) 991-5495 mrodriguez@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 11/19/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Proposed fire hydrant appears to be obstructed and not accessible from the parking lot. It appears to be obstructed by the dumpster enclosure and transformer. Please explain proposed hydrant location. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 11/20/2025 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | DTM Comments : 1) Refer to PIA review and comments 2) Traffic Impact Analysis to be required do to change of use 3) Driveways to be concrete construction up to back of sidewalk 4) Sidewalk to be required along both Frontages with connections to existing curb access ramps. |
||
| 11/07/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TD-DEV-1025-00258 Location: 9015 E TANQUE VERDE RD Review Date: 11/7/2025 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1025-00258, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. Clearly show downspouts and sidewalk scuppers for the building to ensure that stormwater from roof drains, up to and including flow from the ten-year storm event, does not pass over sidewalks per Technical Standards Manual 7-01.4.3E. Sheet 7 has keynote #10 but unsure where exactly this can be seen from the plans provided. 3. Show the 2ft minimum grading setback from the property line on the grading plan TSM 2-01.9.0 4. Show that erosion protection is used for all inlet and outlet structures. The erosion protection shall extend below the finished grade of the basin floor and/or side slope to the appropriate design depth. DSSDR 4.8.1.4 It can be seen for the center curb cut but not for the others. 5. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to each basin on the site plan (Includes Stormwater Harvesting basins/landscaping). Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box: a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet; b. If applicable, detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet; c. If applicable, retention volume, cubic feet; d. If applicable, first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; e. If applicable, Q100 in, cubic feet per second; f. If applicable, Q100 out, cubic feet per second; g. Basin top elevation, feet; h. 100-year water surface elevation, feet; and i. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet. DSSDR 11.1.3 6. On sheet 7 the area to the west of the building shows a 1:1 slope and calls out dumped riprap but detail P on sheet 10 shows grouted riprap please revise sheet 7 to call out grouted riprap. DSSDR 4.7.1 Table 4.1 7. The curb openings shall be a maximum of 2 feet in width with 45-degree sloped sides for the stormwater harvesting basin. DSSDR 5.4.1.d 8. Basin side slopes shall be 3:1 or flatter for roadside stormwater harvesting basins DSSDR 5.4.2 If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/24/2025 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: EXISTING BANK BUILDING / REBUILD TO A CIRCLE K C-STORE, FUELING CANOPY, PARKING, GRADING, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1025-00258 ADDRESS: 9015 E TANQUE VERDE RD ZONING: C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE LAND USE: COMMERCIAL CONVENIENCE STORE 11.24.2025 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape and NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. City site engineering comments may affect the overall drainage of the site. Prior to site landscape approval, please coordinate with the civil engineer to make sure site engineering comments are addressed and anything that needs coordinated, is included on the landscape plan set. 2. Add the activity number to all sheet in the landscape set. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |
||
| 11/19/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Loran Shamis PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: New Circle K Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1025-00258 - 9015 E TANQUE VERDE RD TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 19, 2025 DUE DATE: November 21, 2025 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 21, 2025. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – Provide a brief legal description in the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1025-00258 adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – In the project location map on the cover sheet, show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - In the project location map on the cover sheet, identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Correct the listed use specific standards per UDC 4.8.6. Retail - General Merchandise Sales, excluding Large Retail Establishment in C-1 is subject to UDC 4.9.9.B.3 and 4.9.13.O, and the cover sheet states UDC 4.9.9.B.1, which is not applicable. 6. COMMENT: 2-60.4.7.A.6 – As the site is within the Major Streets and Routes Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone, compliance with UDC 5.3.6.B, “A site that has at least 200 feet of frontage along a Scenic Route must provide view corridors as follows: 1. The view corridor(s) shall have a combined width of at least 20% of that frontage; and, 2. There must be at least one view corridor from the Scenic Route into and through that portion of the project that lies within the SCZ. (See Figure 5.3-D.) 7. COMMENT: 2-60.4.7.A.6 – As the site is within the Major Streets and Routes Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone, demonstrate compliance with UDC 5.3.10.A “Building or structure surfaces that are visible from the Scenic Route, shall have colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide the floor area for each building in a note. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Provide the recordation information of the Cross Access Agreement. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Provide the recordation information, location, width and purpose of all new and existing easements. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Dimension the width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks in the right of way. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – it appears the proposed development is removing some parking from the adjacent property to the north (APN 11451141A) which is a part of a shopping center. Provide a parking calculation for the entire shopping center with the required and provided number of parking spaces. Reference DP21-0223 for most recent parking numbers by visiting https://pro.tucsonaz.gov/. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide a pedestrian circulation path to the fueling stations and to E Catalina Hwy that meets the requirements of TSM 7-01. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S – Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting right-of-way. Such sidewalk must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Include a note stating all signage requires separate permits. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Loran Shamis by email Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf |
||
| 10/30/2025 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | EXTERNAL REVIEWERS CDRC added: TEP, SWG USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TEP, and FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG. |
||
| 10/30/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/30/2025 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/30/2025 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/27/2025 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |