Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-1025-00253
Parcel: 133231340

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-1025-00253
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/31/2025 Commercial Plumbing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-1025-00253
ADDRESS/PARCEL: (1010 N FINANCE CENTER DR TUCSON, AZ 85710)
COMMENTS
1. Please provide the size and location of the water meter and the backflow preventer on the utilities plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.
11/07/2025 NPPO Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Please see Site Landscape review comments for NPPO requirements.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
10/13/2025 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT DTM review notes:
1) Sidewalk along west side of the property falls with in property line and will required public pedestrian access easement agreement. If already have please provide documentation.
2) City DTM landscaping review will be required for placement of Artificial Turf within the Right of Way.
11/03/2025 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit: TD-DEV-1025-00253
Location: 1010 N FINANCE CENTER DR
Review Date: 11/3/2025
Site Engineering Comments:
1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1025-00253, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.
2. The work proposed on the southeast of the property is designated as floodway, because of the floodway status, it will be required that a floodplain use permit be submitted for work within a floodplain.
3. For the submission of the floodplain use permit (FPU), please provide the site plans for the project.
4. Provide the Waste Stream Calculations for the site according to TSM 8-01.8.0
5. Show that the inside slab of the trash enclosure slopes 1% towards the gate and the ramp slopes 2% away from the enclosure on the grading plans in compliance with Technical Standard Manual 8-01.9.0 Figure 3. It currently shows as both 2.0% and 2.0% on detail A of sheet 4.
6. Remove General note 23 from the cover sheet as the trail does run along the East portion of the site.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact
Marco Contreras
Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
11/07/2025 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: MINOR SITE/UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR NEW TENANT MIX
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1025-00253
ADDRESS: 1010 N FINANCE CENTER DR
ZONING: PAD-3 GATEWAY CENTRE PAD
REVIEW DATE: 11.07.2025

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape and NPPO Section review comments have been addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. Prior to approval, see Transportation Landscape comments with regard to the use of artificial turf within the ROW.

2. Are canopy trees intended to be within the diamonds at the north portion of the uncovered parking area? Add the trees and irrigation lines if that is the intention.

3. Callout number 13 should be number 10 on the synthetic turf detail. QA/QC for any other plan information coordination.

4. Add a brief summary on sheet LP-001 that describes how the landscape design is meeting or exceeding the PAD-3 (Gateway Centre PAD) landscape requirments.

5. If key note callout numbers are going to be shown on sheet LP-100, then include the key note schedule on the sheet.

6. Just an observation, but there is not any shade provided for the outdoor seating located at the northwest corner of the building/patio. Possibly add a few shade trees near this pedestrian use area.

7. The DG hatch symbol is difficult to locate on the plan view within the design. It appears to only be placed within the central plaza area. If that is the only area, then possibly add a leader callout as well for clarity, or possibly look at using a slightly different hatch pattern.

8. A NPPO Wavier was not included with this submittal. The preserve in place of “possibly protected native trees” far out ways the remove from site “possibly protected native trees”. Include a quick calculation/summary to the NPPO sheet that explains what is happening with the existing vegetation that might be part of the Native Plant Preservation Ordinance. Provide a NPPO waiver for project records if applicable.

9. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1025-00253, adjacent to the title block on all site landscape sheets, per Administrative Manual 2-06.4.3

10. Prior to Site Landscape Development Package approval, please make sure Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are addressed.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
520.837.4923
11/05/2025 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO:
Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM:
Olga Salazar
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT:
1010 North Finance Center Drive, Tucson, AZ 85710
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-1024-00253

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 5th, 2025
DUE DATE: October 31, 2025

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 06, 2026.


SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)


2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 – Add a reduce-scale map on cover sheet as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - The proposed location, 1010 North Finance Center Drive, is within Development Area 1 of PAD-3, specifically the 1C area. Alcoholic Beverage Service use is not permitted as a principal use within this area. This use may be permitted as an accessory use to food service (excluding soup kitchens). Clearly identify this use as an accessory use. As an accessory use, the Alcoholic Beverage Service may then be parked at the Food Service rate of 1 space per 100 sf of GFA (instead of 1 space per 50 sf). This may change your current parking calculations; as such, please update the parking calculations tables.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – The total Gross Floor Area (GFA) listed in the Development Package (50,906 s.f.) does not match the total GFA listed in the building plans (50,171 s.f.). Correct this information.

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Add percentages as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – Provide the information as noted by the standard above, as shown in Subdivision Book 37, Page 25. You can find this information at the following link: https://maps-and-records.tucsonaz.gov/subdivisions/search?book=37&pg=025.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – Provide lot dimensions as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Add adjacent zoning to the east, which is SR, on the cover sheet and site plan.

2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.3 – Add a note to indicate fire circulation as noted by the standard above.




2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Section 7.4.6.D.1 Table 7.4.6-A: Motor Vehicle Use Area Dimensions, the minimum parking space depth for a 90-degree parking space is 18 feet. Parking spaces shown on the site plan on the south of the property appear to have a depth of only 17.1 ft. and 17 ft., and on the east of the property, a depth of 16.50 ft. Correct and provide minimum required dimensions. Additionally, the minimum width for a two-way traffic aisle is 24 ft. The two-way traffic aisle located to the northeast of the parking lot has a pedestrian crossing that encroaches on this 24 ft. distance. Draw and dimension the required width in this area, excluding the pedestrian crossing.

2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - Provide a drawing of the off-site parking area as noted by the standard above. Ensure the number of off-site parking spaces listed in the Development Package (13 spaces) matches the number of parking spaces shown on the building plans (10 spaces).

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Ensure the building plans show the location of hangers for long-term parking spaces within the building.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide building height as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Indicate the location of the gang mailboxes on the site plan. If they are located inside the building, please add a note indicating this.

***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Olga Salazar by email Olga.Salazar@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home.
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
10/21/2025 Transportation Landscape Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Artificial Turf is not allowed in the ROW. Please find an alternate.
10/10/2025 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED EXTERNAL REVIEWERS
CDRC added: ADDRESSING, TEP, ENTITLEMENTS, SWG USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent to , TEP, FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG.
11/05/2025 Entitlements Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
10/10/2025 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED FYI
CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
10/10/2025 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED FYI
CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
10/27/2025 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED 4350 E. Irvington Road
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702
October 27, 2025
WO#T166362
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: 1010 NORTH FINANCE CENTER DRIVE
TD-DEV-1025-00253
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted 10/13/2025. There are existing facilities within the development which
are depicted upon the plan. There are no apparent conflicts at this time.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-
8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving
off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the
plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department,
LandReviews@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Martin Rodriguez
(520) 991-5495
mrodriguez@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
10/10/2025 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED FYI
CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
10/30/2025 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
10/06/2025 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
10/09/2025 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
10/14/2025 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED