Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1025-00252
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/15/2026 | NPPO Standard | APPROVED | The PDSD Site Landscape Review Section has included the activity number TD-DEV-1025-00252 on the native plant preservation sheets during this first submittal as the plans are in compliance and approved. Thank you. Chad Keller, PLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/15/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 03/25/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-1025-00252 (1st Review) Project: grading permit – Engineered Grading/Stockpiling Location: 3291 N WALNUT AV Review Date: 3/25/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate - Site Engineering Related Cases: *This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. * City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1025-00252, adjacent to the title block on all sheets 2. As a wash runs along the Western property boundary – Delineate the banks/area associated with this wash. This includes showing the possible floodplain limits in the case flows are regulatory. As this is a recognized wash, it is required that no disturbance be done to this area. If the flows are regulatory (likely as the plats around the area show significant flow rates), It would be required that a potential erosion hazard setback be analyzed/calculated to ensure no adverse impact are created by the amount of fill being brought in. The associated Q flow rates should be shown on the plan set accordingly. 3. Provide clarification if fill pad will be compacted at this stage of development. TSM 2-01.8.4 4. Provide a total area of disturbance value with the Earthwork quantities. Differential & Engineered Grading Comments: 5. As the placement of fill is shown to be an average height of 6-feet, differential grading has been triggered per TSM 2-01.8.1.A. Refer to comments below regarding requirements: a. Written justification based on engineering/technical reasons for the use of this fill TSM 2-01.8.1.A.1 b. Written Permission of the PDSD Director TSM 2-01.8.1.A.2 c. Notification of property owners adjacent to the fill site prior to the final approval of this grading/stockpiling plan. TSM 2-01.8.1.A.3 d. Possibility for a mitigation plan TSM 2-01.8.1.A.4 6. As the work shown falls under the “Engineered Grading” designation as shown through TSM 2-01.4.1.C, provide the soils and Geotech report associated with the development. As this is simply a stockpiling use atm due to unforeseen future development, a simple soils report and Geotech memo will be sufficient. They should address: a. Additional slope treatment requirements based on determined fill characteristics b. Soil stability with no compaction done c. Necessary benching requirements and site preparation details 7. Show both existing and proposed elevations and contours. TSM 2-01.4.1.C.2 8. Ensure the proposed fill falls within compliance with TSM 2-01.8.2 – especially regarding the width of toe of fill necessary. 9. Ensure the proposed fill falls within compliance with TSM 2-01.8.3 – potential rock disposal areas should be shown on the grading plan. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras at Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/10/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bobby Parsons PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Stockpile/Grading - 3291 N. Walnut Ave. Tucson, AZ 85712 Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1025-00252 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 4/10/2026 DUE DATE: 4/14/2026 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 20, 2027. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1025-00252, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – If applicable, please delineate the erosion hazard setback. 3. COMMENT: Please address Site Engineering comments. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations *** If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf |
||
| 03/23/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | External Reviewers not required. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 04/09/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/14/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/19/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/20/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/15/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/02/2026 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |