Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: TD-DEV-1024-00295
Parcel: 116110100

Address:
3053 W ANKLAM RD

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-1024-00295
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/04/2024 Commercial Plumbing APPROVED
12/12/2024 NPPO NOT REQUIRED
12/12/2024 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
12/05/2024 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT see zoning comment
12/12/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO SIZE ZONING COMMENTS FOR PERMIT TC-COM-0524-01047

ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1024-00295
ADDRESS: 3053 W ANKLAM RD
ZONING: O-3 OFFICE ZONE

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. It appears that the new bike rack location and construction area will not affect the existing Ocotillo that are within the planting area. For precaution and protection of the Ocotillo, provide a protective fencing note and detail to the site plan so that the root zones are protected from compaction due to the concrete flat work that will be completed to install the bike rack.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
or at 520.837.4923
12/02/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Ramiro Olivarez
PDSD: Zoning Review

PROJECT: Bedroom Conversion - 3053 W ANKLAM RD
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-1024-00295

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 02, 2024

DUE DATE: December 04, 2024

CHECKLIST FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT CHANGES TO EXISTING
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL SITES

Purpose
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the
submittal and review requirements for minor changes to existing commercial sites to
assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner,
thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The minor revisions to
existing commercial sites are prepared in support of applications for building permits
and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will
be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should
there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard
does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

Applicability
This standard shall be used for minor changes to existing commercial sites such as
but not limited to; expansions less than 25% in square footage of land area, floor
area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, modification to accessible vehicle parking,
parking area restripe, etc. Applicability to be determined by Zoning and/or
Engineering review staff via email or at PDSD review counter

APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed
applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or
inaccurate applications will not be accepted. The types of documents and the
specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD
website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages
require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have
been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response
letter as plans provided.

The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:
1. A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designed.
2. A development package must be prepared to the format and content
requirements described herein.
3. Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule or
as determined on an hourly rate.


FORMAT REQUIREMENTS
6a. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square
mile area. Identify major streets within the square mile area and all streets
that abut the subject property. Section, township, and range, north arrow,
and the scale will be labeled.

COMMENT: Identify and label all section corners within the location map. Include the G & SRM before Pima County, Arizona. As noted by the Standard above.

10. An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first
sheet.

COMMENT: If applicable, if more sheets are required based on DP review comments, add the index of sheets to the first page. As noted by the Standard above.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
1. The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary
property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other
person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package
documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable
registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the
assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape
architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of
Technical Registration guidelines.

COMMENT: Include the firm’s applicable information under the contacts information. List all the applicable personnel mailing addresses as noted in the Standard above.


GENERAL NOTES
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are
required where applicable.

2. List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage.

COMMENT: Per the Recorded Final Plat (Book 18, Page 75) the gross total area of the site is 0.95 acres or 41,404.1 square feet. Correct general note 2.

4. Floor area for each building.

COMMENT: Ensure the floor area for each building is dimensioned and accurate rather than estimated. As noted by the Standard above.

5. Percentage of gross floor area, land area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the
building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall
be included.

COMMENT: It is acknowledged that there is no gross floor area, land area, or vehicular use area expansion but there is a density increase. Add an existing and proposed density use calculation based on 22 units/acre based of the O-3 Zone.


EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS:

1. Provide site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and
seconds, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other
functional reference system.

COMMENT: Label the bearing for the north property line.

3. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way
adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width,
recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and
sidewalks.

COMMENT: Dimension the half right-of-way (existing and future) for Anklam Rd. Draw, label, and dimension the width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks as noted by the Standard above. See Maps and Records Construction Plan I-2005-003, Sheet 11. (https://maps-and-records.tucsonaz.gov/construction-plans/details/I-2005-003)


INFORMATION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or
added as notes.

2. Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As
a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio
used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and
provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space
locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be
provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled.
For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to
adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for
parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area
Design Criteria, of the UDC.

COMMENT: It is acknowledged that you are requesting a reduction in parking. In order to reduce vehicle parking a total of 18 bicycle parking spaces are required. See comment 3 below related to bicycle parking.

3. Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section
7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note,
calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

COMMENT: As acknowledged in the comment above you are requesting a reduction in parking by adding bicycle parking spaces. In order to reduce the requested vehicle parking a total of 18 bicycle parking spaces are required. A total of 11 long-term bicycle parking spaces, one in each unit. A total of 7 short-term bicycle parking spaces will be required. An additional 2 bicycle parking racks will be required to provide the additional 3 short-term bicycle spaces. (Draw and label the 2 additional bicycle parking racks on the plan and correct the bicycle parking calculation on the plan.)

Per UDC 7.4.5.F.3 - Reduction Based on Providing Additional Bicycle Parking.
“For every six non-required bicycle parking spaces that meet the short or long-term bicycle parking standards, the motor vehicle parking requirement may be reduced by one space. Motor vehicle parking spaces may be converted to bicycle parking spaces pursuant to Section 7.4.9.B.1.g.”

6. All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain
detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be
shown.

COMMENT: Draw, label, and dimension the east property line setback to the individual existing building.

7. Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or
business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the
building(s).

COMMENT: Provide the height and dimensioned square footage of all structures as noted by the Standard above.

8. Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design
criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards
Manual.

COMMENT: Add a keynote indicating the existing sidewalk and width.

10. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening
location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and
access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For
specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste
and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards
Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that
section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

COMMENT: Provide the information on the plan as noted by the Standard above.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A corrected development package as well as a comment response letter (Do Not add revision clouds to the plan). To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Ramiro Olivarez at Ramiro.Olivarez@tucsonaz.gov
11/04/2024 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
11/18/2024 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED External Reviewers not required. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
12/03/2024 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
11/14/2024 OK to Submit - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
11/15/2024 OK to Submit - Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED
11/18/2024 ROW Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Review Complete- No Effect to Right of Way..