Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1024-00287
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 12/12/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Site Landscape Comments for NPPO requirements. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/22/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-1024-00287 • 2444 N BALBOA AV 1. Please Include the following notes on your revised plan: All construction and test methods shall be in conformance with the current Pima Association of Governments (PAG) Standard Specifications and Standard Details for Public Improvements. A Right-of-Way (ROW) Permit shall be obtained from the city of Tucson Department of Transportation and Mobility (DTM), prior to any work within the public right-of-way. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at 520-403-0970 or email richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 12/09/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Pedestrian circulation is required to connect all buildings, dumpster areas, and the sidewalk on the street frontage per TSM 7-01.3.3. Show a continuous pedestrian path.2. 2. Provide all PAAL dimensions and ensure compliance with TSM 7.4.6. 3. Show the slope of the waste enclosure slab and apron and ensure min. 1% and 2%, respectively, per TSM 8. 4. Provide a detail of the detention basin including side slopes and slope stabilization mechanisms. 5. The following comments apply to the drainage report: a) Provide a map of the existing and proposed drainage patterns and watershed areas across the site as they relate to the data entered into the PC-LID spreadsheets. It is not clear where the first, second, and first watersheds are. b) The PC-LID spreadsheets need to be revised. Section 1 has inaccurate values. Please enter accurate values for non-contributing basin area, watershed area to stormwater harvesting basins, and first flush retention provided in detention basin. Section 4 should have 0.75ft as the ponding depth for basin E. The first flush retention values in 8 are not accurate (i.e. the stormwater harvesting basins provide 1534cf of retention based on section 5, not 3178.3cf as shown in section 8; the detention basin does not provide 6272.6cf of retention volume - see section 4 comment above - the basin has a maximum capacity of 1644cf at 1.5ft and retention would be the volume up to 0.75ft depth). The retention numbers shown on page 8 of the plan set do not match the drainage report/PC-LID spreadsheets. The numbers should match. c)Unless it can clearly be shown that detention is achieved using the PC-LID spreadsheets, routing calculations will be required. If you provide routing calculations, you can provide the first flush calculations from sheet 8 of the plan set (change SWH depth of basin E to 0.75ft regardless) and remove the PC-LID spreadsheets. 6. Remove "Retention Calculations" and "Retention Met" from sheet 8 of the plan set. The 100-year calculations are for detention, not retention, and the post-development Q should not be shown as higher than the pre-development Q. This information can be addressed in the drainage report. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/12/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE FOR MULTI FAMILY EXPANSION TO THE EXISTING APARTMENT ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1024-00287 ADDRESS: 2444 N BALBOA AV ZONING: O-3 OFFICE ZONE LAND USE: MULTIFAMILY This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1024-00287, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 2. Prior to Site Landscape Development Package approval, please make sure Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are addressed. 3. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 4. The following comments are a result of not providing an adequate planting plan and details, irrigation plan and details, or commercial rainwater harvesting plan and required plant water demand spreadsheet as required per the ordinance and Technical Standards Manual. If you would like to use a set of approved plans as reference while preparing your plans, then please reach out and I will email a set to you. Other references: City of Tucson Standard planting and irrigation details can be found here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects. For your reference/use in completing your landscape development package. 5. The existing tree schedule indicates that some viable mesquites are being demolished. Protected native plants will need to be protected in place, transplanted or mitigated within the grading limits and will require a Protected Native Plant Inventory, compiled by a Native Plant Professional, see 7.7.4.D PROFESSIONAL EXPERTISE: Preparation of all elements of the Native Plant Preservation Plan. A plant professional, such as: 1. An arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture; 2. A landscape architect; or, 3. A horticulturist, biologist, or botanist with a minimum B.A. or B.S. in an appropriate arid environment natural resource field. For more information on the mitigation requirements, see UDC 7.7.5 and table 7.7.5-1: protected native plant preservation credits and mitigation standards. If it is determined by one of the listed plant professionals in this section, a NPPO Waiver may be submitted for review and approval. 6. Provide a standalone planting plan that includes the required landscape border plant material including understory vegetative groundcover at 50% coverage. Provide a planting legend that includes the botanical name and common name with unique symbols per plant type, size in gallons or box to be planted, and quantity. 7. Provide an irrigation plan, details and specifications per UDC Administration Manual 2-10.4.2.C and Technical Standards Manual Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards. Irrigation details can be found on the CoT website here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects. For your reference/use in completing your landscape development package. Example details: - Automatic Controller: wall mount, or pedestal mount - Backflow Preventer - Irrigation pipe sleeving - Irrigation trenching - Drip control valve assembly - Multi-outlet emitter - Single outlet emitter - End flush cap - Rain shut off device ETC. 8. A standalone Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required per UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.3.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards. The Landscape Plan should match the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan as well as the Grading Plan. The landscape plan should also have spot elevations in the detention/retention areas as well as in all water harvesting infiltration areas on the Landscape Plan. Maximize the rainwater harvesting across the site into the landscape areas, including but not limited to the street landscape borders as well as the tree wells for the required trees for the parking lot. The Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan must utilize the Site Water Budget. See TSM 4-01.0.0 Exhibit A. The Site Water Budget is how the Water Department tracks the irrigation water use on-site, not first flush retention volume charts. 9. Label sight visibility triangles as well as existing and future ROWs on all landscape plans. 10. Label the project property lines on all landscape sheets. 11. It is indicated that 5’ of the street landscape border will utilize the city ROW. DTM review is required for all planting and irrigation in the ROW prior to the approval of the development package. Reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov). Once reviewed, DTM will provide a letter, or email corresponding to their requirements or approval. Include the correspondence with your next submittal. 12. On the planting plan provide notes and a call out to the existing trees that they will receive protective fencing at the trees dripline to protect the root structure from compaction due to construction activities on site. Also include a detail for the protective fencing. 13. Please label irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. See TSM 4-01.6.0 14. Please show all irrigation sleeves for irrigation lines crossing hardscape. 15. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for trees located near hardscape areas. See Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects 16. A rainwater harvesting basin schematic detail is not a requirement but adding it to CRWHP would be a nice addition for construction clarity. If you would like to add the detail and need an example, please reach out and I will send an example of the schematic for reference. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov or at 520.837.4923 |
||
| 12/12/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Balboa Multifamily Development Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1024-00287 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 12, 2024 DUE DATE: December 06, 2024 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 18, 2025. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the name, email addresses, and phone number of the property owner listed on the first sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – Provide a brief legal description within the title block. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1024-00287, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label the section corners and the scale on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Remove the reference to “Vacant” from the existing use listed on sheet 1. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 – List the total number of units proposed. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building & vehicle use area expansion calculation on the plan., 9. COMMENT: Provide a density calculation that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.7. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – Provide the site boundary information to include bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds. It does not appear that the east/west dimensions are correct. Review the Coronado Heights final plat found at https://maps-and-records.tucsonaz.gov/subdivisions/search?book=03&pg=115, and provide the correct dimensions. Also, as a lot combination is required remove the property that runs east/west through the property. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Balboa Ave. right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this is site is made up of 2 parcels a lot combination of parcels, 107-14-2250 & 107-14-2260, will be required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessor’s Consolidation Request Form, found at: https://www.asr.pima.gov/Forms?tab=Misc, with the next submittal. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Fully dimension the vehicle use area. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking calculation shall include the number of van accessible required and provided. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Zoning acknowledges you are proposing to use and IPP to reduce the required number of vehicle parking spaces. Until the IPP is approved Zoning cannot approve this plan. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly show that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.11 & 7.4.12 are met. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle parking calculation shall include the number of provided space for both long- & short-term. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle parking detail shall reflect exactly what you are proposing not just the layout from UDC Figure 7.4.9-C and shall clearly show how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.a, .d & .e, UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.a, .f & .g are met. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The setbacks listed under Project Data are not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b for street perimeter yard setbacks and UDC Table 6.3-3.B for side and rear setbacks. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide perimeter yard setback dimension from the proposed buildings to the applicable property lines. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a wall height measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. Where the wall meets the eave of the roof. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the proposed square footage and height of the buildings with in the footprint. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.3.3 & 7-01.4.d are met. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also, provide a general note stating all signage requires separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 11/26/2024 | Zoning Modifications - IPP | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Zoning review comments are required prior to submitting an IPP application in order to confirm needed modifications. Please e-mail Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov for questions regarding this comment. | ||
| 11/26/2024 | Zoning Modifications - Variance | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Zoning review comments are required prior to submitting a variance application in order to confirm needed modifications. Please e-mail Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov for questions regarding this comment. | ||
| 11/06/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/19/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Addressing and TEP PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 12/06/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/19/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 11/19/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 11/25/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | November 22, 2024 WO#T134294 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Balboa Multi Family Development TD-DEV-1024-00287 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 11/19/2024. There are existing facilities within the development which are not depicted upon the plan. Any TEP facilities within the project location that do not meet the minimum clearances or need to be relocated will be 100% billable to the customer. Further, Book 491 Page 11 attached for existing TEP facilities which are not reflected within site plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Chuck Leon (520) 400-6133 cleon@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 11/19/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 12/04/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/15/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/19/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |