Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1023-00421
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/05/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 12/08/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/11/2023 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 12/11/2023 | Site Landscape | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 12/14/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 12/14/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. As a new trash enclosure is being proposed, show on the plans that it is compliant with enclosure standards from TSM section 8-01 or note that it is. 2. Dimension and clarify if the proposed trash enclosure is a double or single enclosure. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/29/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Chevron – 3370 N. Country Club Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1023-00421 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 29, 2023 DUE DATE: December 14, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 13, 2024. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1023-00421, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As new sidewalks are proposed with a reconfiguration of the vehicle parking area provide PAAL width dimensions on the plan. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met for the provided short-term bicycle parking and how the UDC Article 7.4.9.D.5 are met for the provided long-term bicycle parking 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The long-term bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.a.(1) no long-term bicycle parking is required on a site where there is less than 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The north street perimeter yard setback listed under General Note 14 is not correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b the required street perimeter yard setback is 20’-0 as measured from the street property line. Zoning acknowledges that a 2’-0 encroachment is allowed per UDC Article 6.4.5.D.2.a.(2). 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The east street perimeter yard setback listed under General Note 14 is not correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b the required street perimeter yard setback is 20’-0 as measured from the street property line. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The west street perimeter yard setback listed under General Note 14 is not correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.a, for nonresidential and multifamily development abutting on Arterial or “Collector street the minimum required street perimeter yard is ten feet, as measured from the existing or future property line as determined by the adopted Major Streets and Routes Plan, whichever is greater. Based on the street dimensions shown on this plan for Country Club Rd., County Club is not at full width, 100’ based on the COT MS&R map. Clearly show the future right-of-way and provide a setback dimension to the street future property line. A Board of Adjustment for Variance may be required. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of the proposed fuel canopy within the footprint. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 11/13/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/15/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | External Reviewers not required. No further action is required from customer at this time. |
||
| 12/11/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/14/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | 1. Approval by the Department of Transportation and Mobility (DTM) and Temporary Revocable Easement (TRE) for the development in the right of way will be required. 2. Provide the last approved development package demonstrating the existing parking configuration in the right of way was permitted. To request historic records through the Tucson Development Center online by following these directions and applying for a Records Request - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/apply-for-a-permit-plan-or-records.pdf Otherwise a Board of Adjustments Variance will be required - contact Mark Castro at mark.castro@tucsonaz.gov for more information. Loran Shamis Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/12/2023 | Signs | REVIEW COMPLETED | RE: signage review For: Chevron – increase site use area & add ROW AT: 3370 N Country Club Rd (SE corner of Country Club and Kleindale) Plan: TD-DEV-1023-00421 Zoned: C-1 Reviewer: H. Thrall (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov) Date: 12/12/23 Codes: Unified Development Code Section 7A, 10.2.A-C (Tucson Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code) 1. The existing convenience store has a large nonconforming pole sign on the site where the planned fuel station canopy would be located. Add a note to the development package sheet that this sign is to be removed from the site. 2. Staff is familiar with, and has no objection to, the purchase of right of way along Kleindale Road for the redevelopment of this site to add a fuel station canopy and reconfigure access and parking at the site. 3. As space is a premium, the development team may wish to place signage along the fuel canopy façade, which is permitted. The signage may not extend above the fuel canopy façade. The signage may be illuminated, may be digital (max rate of change 1x minute), and must dim to 200 Nits light brightness at night. 4. If the location closes, signs turn off at midnight or business closure (the later hour applies), via timing device that would be checked at inspection. A timer is required for all signs regardless of business hours. 5. A licensed sign contractor or electrician at minimum, are required for the permitting and installation of signage. 6. Sign area ratio in general here at this location is 3 square feet of sign area for each 1 linear foot of street frontage. Signs cannot cover more than 30% of a building elevation. (For the fuel canopy, the implied area for this coverage would be the full dimensions as if a solid wall.) 7. A freestanding sign is permitted here, however, space and location per code will be an issue to consider carefully. For a monument or low-profile sign, it is limited to placement either on Kleindale or Country Club, but not at the corner (so as to count as two signs). If a monument sign is proposed, a 20’ setback from face of curb to leading edge of sign should be planned, with a maximum height at 10’ tall. For a low-profile sign, an 8’ tall sign may have 16’ setback, providing it is outside of sight visibility triangles. 8. If you have questions or wish to share renderings, please contact me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov I can be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov if you have any questions. |