Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1023-00415
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 11/15/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/16/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 11/16/2023 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 11/16/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/16/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Keynote 1 is not sufficient to show 1' distance between drive through lane and a window. 2. UDC 7.4.6-2 requires a 10' one way access lane. joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/31/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Axis Food Mart Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1023-00415 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 31, 2023 DUE DATE: November 15, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Purpose This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for minor changes to existing commercial sites to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The minor revisions to existing commercial sites are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. Applicability This standard shall be used for minor changes to existing commercial sites such as but not limited to; expansions less than 25% in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, modification to accessible vehicle parking, parking area restripe, etc. Applicability to be determined by Zoning and/or Engineering review staff via email or at PDSD review counter. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 12, 2024. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 6. COMMENT: Label the section, township, and range on the location map. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1023-00415, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: The existing use called out under General Note 4 and the proposed use called out under General Note 5 are note uses as classified per the UDC. The use, existing & proposed use should be called out as General Merchandise Sales, excluding Large Retail Establishment subject to Use Specific Standard 4.9.9.B.1. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. COMMENT: Per UDC Table 7.4.6-2 the minimum width of a one-way access lane is 10’-0”, the proposed drive-thru does not meet this requirement at the east end. 2. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(2) show the required 1’-0” setback from the drive-thru to the existing building. 2. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen , or other obstruction over six inches. Show the required 2’-0” setback from the existing power pole show along the south side of the proposed drive-thru If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 10/09/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/18/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | Added external reviewers, sent emails and sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 11/01/2023 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good Morning, ADOT has no comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review. |
||
| 10/18/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 10/18/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 10/18/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 10/18/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 11/02/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/13/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/11/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/10/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |