Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-1023-00411
Parcel: 13612833C

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3

Permit Number - TD-DEV-1023-00411
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/28/2023 NPPO APPROVED
12/28/2023 Site Landscape APPROVED
12/28/2023 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
12/12/2023 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Comment not resolved. Show the proposed water meter located within the existing utility easement. [Initial comment: Tucson Water will install the proposed 1” water meter within the existing utility easement. The domestic water service pipe downstream of the water meter will be installed by your contractor as will the reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly (RPA). The proposed location of the RPA will be acceptable to Tucson Water.]
2. Show the required cleanouts (sanitary waste and grease waste), at the junction of the building drain and the building sewer. [Initial comment: Provide a cleanout at the junction of the building drain and the building sewer. Reference: Section 708.1.3, IPC 2018.]
3. Comment not resolved. Do not specify the linear distance between cleanouts as 100-feet; a developed length of 100-feet will result in a shorter linear distance between the cleanouts. [Initial comment: The maximum distance between cleanouts shall be 100-feet, measured along the developed pipe length from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. Reference: Section 708.1.1, IPC 2018.]
12/14/2023 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Salad and Go – 9556 E. Golf Links Rd
Development Package (2nd Review)
TD-DEV-1023-00411

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 14, 2023

DUE DATE: January 01, 2024

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 26, 2024.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. This comment was not fully addressed and based on the addition of 6 sheets revise the total number of pages to be 22 and ensure that the page numbers are correct starting at page 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages on sheets 13 – 16.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2. This comment was not addressed correctly. The expansion shall include the outdoor workout area for the Platinum Fitness that is located in the east end of the main building, see site plan T10CM02983. Provide the percentage of expansion on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building expansion calculation on the plan. This expansion shall include all buildings on site to include the buildings on parcels 136-12-833A & 136-12-834A as they do not stand alone, i.e. parking is shared for the entire center.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

3. This comment was not fully addressed. Total parking required shows 334 parking spaces (including 18 spaces). Zoning is assuming that the (including 18 space) is the required number of accessible space, but if that is the case per 2018 IBC Table 1106-1 when 287 vehicle parking spaces are provided the required number of accessible space is 7 not 18. Also the calculation does not address the required and provided number of van accessible spaces. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a vehicle parking spaces calculation for the entire site, including parcels 136-12-833A & 136-12-834A that breaks out each use so that the requirements of a Shopping Center, see UDC Article 11.3.9.C.3, can be verified.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As the vehicle parking space calculation does not provide the minimum number required a Board of Adjustment for Variance will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this DP.

5. This comment was not addressed correctly. As you still show long-term bicycle parking on the plan, called out under keynote 19 the long-term bicycle parking calculation should show long-term required – 0, long-term provided 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The required number of long-term bicycle parking spaces is not correct, see UDC Article 7.4.8.B.1.a.(1).

6. This comment was not addressed. Cleary demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.a, & .f are met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short-term bicycle parking space detail that clearly demonstrates that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B & .C are met.

7. This comment was not addressed. As you still show long-term bicycle parking on the plan, called out under keynote 19, provide a detail. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – As you are proposing to provide long-term bicycle parking provided a detail that clearly demonstrates that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D are met.

8. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – It does not appear that the short-term bicycle parking meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.C.2.a.

9. If you are proposing to use the sidewalk located along Golf Links Rd. as your required connection to Harrison Rd. A Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) will need to be submitted and approved Prior to approval of the DP.. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of TSM Section 7-04.1.A are met out to Harrison Rd.

10. This comment was not addressed. No pedestrian circulation, sidewalk has been provided to the other buildings on site. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B &7-04.1.D are met.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter.
12/05/2023 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED The address listed on the plans is 9956 E Golf Links Rd however the address related to the permit is 9556 E Golf Links Rd.