Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.4
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1023-00411
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.4
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/22/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 02/20/2024 | TSMR/PDMR - Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 02/20/2024 | TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | APPROVED | |||
| 02/22/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/08/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Salad and Go – 9556 E. Golf Links Rd Development Package (3rd Review) TD-DEV-1023-00411 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 8, 2024 DUE DATE: February 22, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 26, 2024. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not addressed. Starting at sheet 11 the sheet numbers are not correct. Also, sheets 15-22 there are no page number and the total number of pages provided. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages on sheets 13 – 16. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2. This comment was not addressed correctly. Also based on the sheet 6 submitted in this set, the expansion calculation has been deleted. The expansion shall include the outdoor workout area for the Platinum Fitness that is located in the east end of the main building, see site plan T10CM02983. Provide the percentage of expansion on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building expansion calculation on the plan. This expansion shall include all buildings on site to include the buildings on parcels 136-12-833A & 136-12-834A as they do not stand alone, i.e. parking is shared for the entire center. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. This comment was not addressed. The detail provided is not readable and does not match what is proposed for this site. Also, UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e is not addressed. If you are proposing that the short-term bicycle parking will be illuminated by site or exterior building lighting either provide a note stating that on the plan or detail. Cleary demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.a, & .f are met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short-term bicycle parking space detail that clearly demonstrates that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B & .C are met. 4. This comment was not addressed. Per UDC Article 7.4.9.D.5 Long-term bicycle parking not within a building must be lit by overhead lighting. Your response to this comment states “code states lighting will be provided in the photometric DWG which will be submitted in the development package”. No photometric DWG was provided with the development package and nowhere in the UDC does it state “lighting will be provided in the photometric DWG”. If you are proposing that the long-term bicycle parking will be illuminated by site or exterior building lighting either provide a note stating that on the plan or detail. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – As you are proposing to provide long-term bicycle parking provided a detail that clearly demonstrates that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D are met. 5. If you are proposing to use the sidewalk located along Golf Links Rd. as your required connection to Harrison Rd. A Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) will need to be submitted and approved Prior to approval of the DP.. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of TSM Section 7-04.1.A are met out to Harrison Rd. 6. This comment was not addressed. No pedestrian circulation, sidewalk has been provided to the other buildings on site. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B &7-04.1.D are met. Additional comments due to new sheet 6 addition: CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2 - Provide a title block on sheet 6 that meets the requirements listed in this section. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1023-00411, adjacent to the title block on sheet 6. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 01/22/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | Address on plans does not match the permit however the parcel number is correct. I have reached out to the customer and notified them multiple times. |