Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-1022-00004
Parcel: 116182220

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-1022-00004
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/17/2023 External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services APPROVED Hello,
Approved with condition.
ES Comments are as follows:
The Waste Enclosure detail on page A2.00, Annotate that Four (4) 1” galvanized pipe 6” long embedded…., for each enclosure area. Pointing these areas out on the drawing would be helpful and ensure compliance.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Andy Vera
City of Tucson -Environmental Services
Accounts Representative Supervisor
(520) 837-3798
04/17/2023 Site Landscape APPROVED
05/10/2023 Zoning Modifications - MS&R NOT REQUIRED
05/10/2023 Zoning Modifications - Variance NOT REQUIRED
05/30/2023 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
04/27/2023 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT Initial comment not resolved. Provide the invert and rim elevations of the manholes up and downstream of the building connection to the public sewer. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018
05/15/2023 Historic REQUIRES RESUBMIT If the project is participating in the IID, please submit documents noted in the Historic & Special Districts information handout (https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Special_Districts_Application_Instructions.pdf).
Both properties are considered contributing resources to the Menlo Park National Register Historic District. If the applicant is proposing to participate in the IID, the properties will need to maintain their contributing status. Without seeing elevations, it is difficult to comment on whether or not the proposed alterations are appropriate. However, the ADA ramp proposed for 905 W Congress should be relocated to the east side of the porch, allowing access in a less visible location. The ramp could connect via the east side of the porch. Other changes will need to be reviewed for consistency with the Standards to understand their impact.
05/25/2023 ROW Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT TD-DEV-1022-00004 (901 W CONGRESS ST TUCSON, AZ 85745)

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed.

Comments:

1. The existing 1/2 right of way on W Congress St. seems to be mislabeled as the Future ROW. Future 1/2 ROW on Congress is 50’.
2. New driveway apron on N Melwood Ave. Please add “per P.A.G. Standard Detail 206” to the callout. Please include a detail of this planned driveway apron and sidewalk in the next submission. Consult Tucson Street Design Guide page 3-15 for design options.
3. Please consider repairing the broken sidewalk and curb adjacent to the planned new driveway apron.
4. Tie-in from new driveway to existing sidewalk at a 3:1 taper, at back of sidewalk. Tie-in to sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 203. Please label this taper on the next submission.
5. Callout 13 in the ROW along W Congress St. indicates new sidewalk. If this callout is an error, please remove it. If existing 4’ sidewalk is being replaced, new sidewalk should be 6’ wide. Include the dimension and P.A.G. SD 200 in the call out. Transitions to adjoining 4’ sidewalk per P.A.G. SD 200 and 203.
6. The SVT labeled “LOCAL STEM STREET NEAR SIDE” SVT is not necessary, please remove it.
7. The SVT labeled “ARTERIAL THRU STREET FAR SIDE” should be aligned with the edge of nearest travel lane on Congress, on the south side of the bike lane.
8. Please install detectable warning strips to the existing ramps and the threshold where the sidewalk intersects with the alley.
9. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions.

Reference:
1. Concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 209.
2. Concrete sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200.
3. Concrete curb access ramp per P.A.G. standard 207.

Faffs Riederer
Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov
05/30/2023 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Concrete Curb along Congress and Melwood are out of compliance. Please replace with 6” Vertical curb per PAG 209
2. Sidewalks along Congress and Melwood are out of compliance. Per keynote 13 on sheet A1.01, new sidewalks are being installed. Ensure that they meet PAG 200.
3. Curb Access Ramps at Congress/Melwood Intersection, NW Corner, are out of compliance. Replace per appropriate PAG 207 detail
4. TSMR Required for refuse collection - Does not meet TSM 8-04.9.0 requirements per Figure 4. Detail required for slab, and wall reinforcing. All refuse approaches should be concrete.
5. A TSMR is required for gravel pave approval where proposed. Please provide a narrative and installation plan showing compliance with manufacturer requirements.
6. Driveway apron per PAG 206 required
7. Ensure that all ramps are ADA compliant and provide notes where applicable such as ramp East of Accessible space in North Parking area.
Joshua Garcia
joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov
05/10/2023 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Wyatt Berger
Lead Planner

PROJECT: The Meteor Café and Bike Shop
Development Package (2nd Review)
TD-DEV-1022-00004

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 10, 2023

DUE DATE: May 14, 2023

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06.0.0, and the Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is May 10, 2024.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – This comment was not entirely addressed. Ensure the email addresses of all consultants and contacts affiliated with the development package documents are provided on the cover sheet.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The title block indicates that the development package documents consist of 17 sheets; however, only 16 sheets were submitted. Clarify the discrepancy in page numbers.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – This comment was not entirely addressed. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1022-00004, adjacent to the title block on all submitted sheets. Additionally, provide the Individual Parking Plan case number and any other additional application case numbers as well.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – This comment was not entirely addressed. Food Service, with Alcoholic Beverage Service as an accessory use, is permitted in the C-1 zone, subject to use-specific standards 4.9.4.M.1 and .5, 4.9.4.V.1, .3, .5-.9, 4.9.4.C.3, and 4.9.13.O. Remove all references to the C-2, C-3, OCR-1, and OCR-2 zones. For future reference, a Liquor Mitigation Plan in accordance with 4.9.4.V.9 is required for this proposal.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – This comment was not entirely addressed. Add the development package case number within the Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property and provide the sequence number of the covenant once recorded.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Prior to any motor vehicle parking reductions, the total number of required motor vehicle parking spaces for the site is 32 spaces (2,387 sq. ft. + 189 sq. ft. outdoor dining + 276 sq. ft. outdoor dining for Food Service (1:100), with 958 sq. ft. retail (1:300)). Provide the correct parking formulas and total number of motor vehicle parking spaces required prior to any reductions on Sheet A.101.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Based on the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces required prior to any reductions, three spaces may be reduced through UDC 7.4.5.D; two spaces may be reduced through UDC 7.4.5.F.3; and three spaces may be reduced through UDC 7.4.5.F.7. The cumulative reduction for this sub-section exceeds 20% of the required number of spaces prior to any reduction. An Individual Parking Plan in accordance with UDC 7.4.5.A is required to reduce the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces further.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1, three short-term bicycle parking spaces are required for the Food Service use, and two short-term bicycle parking spaces are required for the retail use. Provide the correct number of total short-term bicycle parking spaces required for the site on Sheet A0.01. Remove the reference to Section 3.3.7.8.A as this was language prescribed within the Land Use Code and not the Unified Development Code.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate that all short-term bicycle parking spaces are located within 50 feet of each public entrance to a building per UDC 7.4.9.C.2. Ensure that all proposed short-term bicycle spaces comply with UDC 7.4.9.B. Outdoor bicycle parking areas must be lighted so that they are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings during hours of use.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – This comment was not addressed. Show long-term bicycle parking facilities in accordance with UDC 7.4.9.D. Four long-term bicycle parking spaces are required in accordance with UDC Table 7.4.8-1. If long-term bicycle parking is proposed within the buildings, provide a general note stating this.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – The proposed van accessible handicapped sign shall provide a minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 84 inches per TSM 7-01.4.3.B.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at (520) 837-4951.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
05/10/2023 Zoning Modifications - IPP REQUIRES RESUBMIT Awaiting submittal of IPP with neighborhood meeting information. If you have any questions please contact me at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov
04/14/2023 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED