Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0926-00258
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/28/2026 | NPPO Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 10/28/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 10/29/2026 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 10/23/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0926-00258 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1302 W PRINCE RD TUCSON, AZ 85705 Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review. If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov COMMENTS: 1. Please show the size of the backflow preventer associated with the water meter and specify the material of the water service line. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2024 2. Please show a cleanout in the building sewer prior to entering the right-of-way on the Utility Plan. Reference: Pima County Standard Detail RWRD 401, 2021. 3. Show the RIM elevation of the nearest upstream manhole on the Utility Plan. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2024, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
||
| 10/16/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0926-00258 (1st Review) Project: Watermill Express Location: 1302 W PRINCE RD Review Date: 10/16/2026 Reviewer: Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer – Site Development Reviewer Contact Information: joe.macaulay@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: TC-COM-0826-01275, TC-UTL-0726-00116 Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0926-00258, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. Please update the Development Package No. descriptor boxes on each of the plan set sheets with the correct information for this project submittal. 3. Provide the page number and total number of pages within the Development Package plan set (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on the bottom right corner of each page. [AM 2-06.4.2.D]. a. Ensure this remains consistent across the entire plan set. Currently, the plan set does not show progressive continuation of the page count, with different total sheets. Please revise accordingly. |
||
| 10/23/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey Cassidy – Planner I PDSD Current Zoning Commercial Review Section PROJECT: Installation of unmanned water vending station placed in 2 leased parking spots in shopping plaza Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0926-00258 1302 W PRINCE RD TUCSON, AZ 85705 C-2 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 23, 2026 Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is July 14, 2027. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-8753 1. COMMENT: On each sheet, include the page number and total number of pages within the Development Package plan set (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on the bottom right corner of each page. (AM 2-06.4.1.B.5). 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0926-00258, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. (AM 2-06.4.1.B.6). 3. COMMENT: On sheet 1, under General Construction Notes, Note 11, add ‘per use specific standard 4.9.13.O (after Food and Beverage Sales). (AM 2-06.4.2.D). 4. COMMENT: On sheet C2.01, add total building square footage (+/- 225 sf) to ‘Proposed Watermill Express’ label. (AM 2-06.4.2.H). 5. COMMENT: Provide zoning (labels) for all surrounding / adjacent parcels (Including across the right of way for W Prince Rd) (AM 2-06.4.7.F). 6. COMMENT: Update the setback along W. Prince Rd from 15’-0” to 10’-0”. (AM 2-06.4.7.G). 7. COMMENT: Include height of structure (not including signage) on site plan sheet. (AM 2-06.4.7.H). 8. COMMENT: Include sequence numbers for labeled and drawn easements. (AM 2-06.4.7.I). 9. COMMENT: Per UDC 7.4.6.D.2, a motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. Indicate compliance with this standard and consider combining this with the need to meet the standard under Comment 12. (AM 2-06.4.7.Q.4). 10. COMMENT: Per UDC 7.4.6.F.2.b, access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two foot from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. Indicate two foot compliance with existing PAAL. (AM 2-06.4.7.Q.4). 11. COMMENT: Per UDC 7.4.6.H.1, barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicle use are to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. (AM 2-06.4.7.Q.4). 12. COMMENT: Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location for this proposed structure utilizing the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. (AM 2-06.4.7.S). 13. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other PDSD reviewer comments. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit revised drawings and any corrected plans along with a detailed response letter, stating how all Site Zoning Review comments were addressed. **Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. ***For additional information on the standards presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/01/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/06/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added ADOT, Addressing, PAG, SWG, USPS, TEP to the workflow. FYI notice sent out to PAG, SWG, USPS, TEP. | ||
| 10/26/2026 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | ADOT has no comments. Thanks, RIck Freije |
||
| 10/06/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/09/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0926-00258. Thank you, David Wilging Planner I - Addressing Division Pima County Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-724-6381 |
||
| 10/06/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/06/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/06/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/29/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/05/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/06/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/28/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED |