Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

The login landing page when selecting 'View' is still occurring and is still pending further investigation. 

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0926-00251
Parcel: 122123020

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0926-00251
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/29/2026 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/29/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/29/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/29/2026 Fire New Construction Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/29/2026 NPPO Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/29/2026 ROW Engineering Review Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/29/2026 ROW Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/29/2026 Site Engineering Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/29/2026 Site Landscape Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/29/2026 Site Zoning Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/25/2026 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0926-00251 (OK To Submit Review)
Project: Equip well B-114A project include pocket park on corner of Pima and Belvedere.
Location: 1647 N BELVEDERE AV
Review Date: 9/25/2026
Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate
Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
Related cases:

Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards.
The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files.

Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference:
City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes
Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333
Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf
Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593

Site Engineering Application Completeness Review Comments:
NOTICE: This is a completeness check review performed by both Site Engineering & Zoning to determine whether the submission in question is sufficient for full review by all applicable reviewing parties. As such, do not interpret the provided comments as finalized complete review comments. They are simply to address outstanding issues caught at this stage of submission.

1. Application incomplete, please provide the following for resubmission:
a. Grading plan sheet(s) have not been included in the submittal package although grading appears proposed including new well site area, landscaping, and associated floodplain impacts. A grading plan prepared, signed, and sealed by a licensed Arizona Civil Engineer is required. At minimum, the grading plan shall address the following:
i. Existing topography depicted with 1- or 2-foot contour intervals, including benchmark and datum reference (NAVD 88)
ii. Proposed contours and/or spot elevations, including finished grade elevations at all building corners, parking areas, and drainage structures
iii. Limits of Disturbance (LOD) delineating the full extent of all proposed grading and drainage-related improvements
iv. Earthwork table - Cut and fill quantities, including total area of disturbance (sq. ft.) and earthwork volumes
v. Engineer of Record stamp and signature block
b. Provide a drainage report demonstrating compliance with applicable drainage requirements such as Balanced basin detention & First-flush retention, as well as demonstrating the function & design of the proposed site.
i. The following references from the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (COT Drainage Manual) and the Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Manual (DSSDR) shall govern report preparation:
1. Report Formatting & Content: COT Drainage Manual §2.3; DSSDR Chapter 10
2. Flood Peak Estimation: COT Drainage Manual Chapter 4
3. Erosion Hazard Assessment: COT Drainage Manual Chapters 6 & 7
4. Drainage Facility Design Standards: COT Drainage Manual Chapters 9–11
5. First-Flush Retention & Detention Guidelines/Triggers: DSSDR Chapters 2, 3, & 4
ii. The site is located and impacted by the Midway Wash FEMA AE Floodplain – the report should include floodplain analysis to ensure no adverse impact is created for surrounding floodplain impacted properties.
09/29/2026 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. COMMENT: Address Site Engineering comments.

Loran Shamis
loran.shamis@tucsonaz.gov
09/24/2026 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED