Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0926-00242
Parcel: 13612833C

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0926-00242
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/22/2026 NPPO Standard NOT REQUIRED
10/22/2026 Site Landscape Standard NOT REQUIRED
10/28/2026 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
10/16/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0926-00242
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 9520 E GOLF LINKS RD TUCSON, AZ 85730

Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review.

If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov.

COMMENTS:

1. Please provide the size of the backflow preventer associated with the water meter. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2024.
2. Provide the material of the proposed water service pipe. Reference: Section 605.3, IPC 2024.
3. Show the RIM elevation of the nearest upstream manhole on the plans to determine whether a backwater valve is required. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2024, as amended by the City of Tucson.
10/05/2026 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0926-00242 (1st Review)
Project: Installation of a pre-manufactured, stand-alone, unmanned water vending station placed in 2 leased parking spots in a local shopping plaza. Unit is trucked in from our Corporate Headquarters Manufacturing Yard, already inspected, approved, and stamped by the State. Local review & inspection is primarily on the foundation and utility connections.
Location: 9520 E GOLF LINKS RD
Review Date: 10/5/2026
Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate & Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer
Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov & joe.macaulay@tucsonaz.gov
Related cases:

Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards.
The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files.

Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference:
City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes
Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333
Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf
Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593

Site Engineering Review Comments:
1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0926-00242) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.4.1.B.6]
2. Coversheet Floodplain Data – The provided FIRM Panel ID is incorrect – the FIRM Panel ID should be 04019C2308L
3. Provide the page number and total number of pages within the Development Package plan set (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on the bottom right corner of each page. [AM 2-06.4.1.B.5].
a. Ensure this remains consistent across the entire plan set. Currently, the plan set does not show progressive continuation of the page count, some sheets simply show “ ___ of 4.” But the plan set appears to be 5 sheets.
4. Denote on plan view (Sheet 2), the proposed height of the watermill structure.
5. Regarding the “Watermill Express” parking spaces – the northern most space appears to be partially clipped by the watermill structure footprint, it will be required that revision be made so that the parking space shown can still be functional with full dimensions that follow UDC 7.4.6.D.
6. Provide a keynote/callout for all proposed bollards.
10/21/2026 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

REVIEWED BY: Olga Salazar – Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Watermill Express
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0926-00242 (9520 E GOLF LINKS RD TUCSON, AZ 85730)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10/21/2026

Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is September 16, 2027.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)



2-06.4 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

4.1 General content for all submitted plans must include the following:

4.1.B A title block on each sheet that includes:

4.1.B.5 The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.B.5 – The submittal includes five pages; however, the page numbers on the plans indicate a total of only four pages. Please correct the total page count on all pages.

4.1.B.6 The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (DP, subdivision, rezoning, BOA, DDO, PDMR, TSMR, overlay, etc.).

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.B.6 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0926-00242, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


4.2 Required zoning and land use notes:

4.2.A. List as a note: “Existing zoning is ____.”

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.A – This property has split zoning: C-1 and C-2. Please add the C-1 zoning designation under the “Notes” section on the site plan and on the cover sheet.

4.2.C. List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.
4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C – Per subdivision plat map Book 34, Page 6 (available here: https://onbase.pima.gov/publicaccess/DS_NextGen_Single/etc/cq/results.html?cqid=240&OBKey__552_1=34006), the total gross site area is 8.24 acres. Please correct this information.

4.2.D. Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. Reference all UDC use-specific standards applicable to the proposed uses.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – On the cover sheet, identify the proposed use as Retail Food and Beverage Sales subject to UDC 4.9.13.O.

4.2.J. Required ratios and number of spaces provided for 1) standard, accessible, and van accessible vehicle parking spaces, 2) electric vehicle parking spaces 3) loading spaces, and 4) short- and long-term bicycle parking.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.J – It appears the project area is part of a shopping center that shares a parking lot with other businesses, operating as a single site. A parking calculation is required to demonstrate sufficient on-site parking to accommodate the proposed water station while ensuring that no more than 50% of the site's floor area is dedicated to uses with a parking formula of one space per 100 square feet of Gross Floor Area (GFA) or a more intense formula, maintaining the Shopping Center definition (UDC 11.3.9.C.3). Please provide parking calculations for the entire site, including the required parking for the proposed water station.

4.7 Existing and Proposed Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the site plan or plat drawing, as relevant to the drawing type, to indicate the existing and proposed conditions on site. In all instances, a distinction shall be made between existing and proposed conditions for clarity. Additional information regarding conditions within 50 ft or across a street may be requested by a reviewer if needed to adequately complete a full review.

4.7.F Indicate all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.F – On the site plan, clearly delineate the boundaries of the C-1 and C-2 zones that encompass the site.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.F – Provide all zoning classifications to the east and south of the property.


4.7.H Illustrate all buildings and provide the square footage, the height, the proposed use, and the number of units (if applicable) within the footprint of each building(s).

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.H – On the site plan, provide the information for all existing on-site buildings, as noted by the standard above.

4.7.I All easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) shall be drawn, dimensioned, and labeled on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Indicate if any existing easements are proposed to be abandoned or vacated. Should an existing easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. Obtain review for conflicts and written concurrence from existing easement holder(s). Said written concurrence must be present as a part of the final package for approval or evidence that the easement will be moved resulting in no additional conflicts.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.I – On the site plan, draw, label, and dimension all easements on-site.

4.7.Q.4 Show full dimensions for all existing and proposed parking and circulation areas in accordance with UDC 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, including: 1) standard, accessible, and van accessible vehicle parking spaces, parking area access lanes (PAAL), and access lanes, 2) electric vehicle parking spaces and equipment, 3) loading spaces, maneuverability, and stacking areas/lanes, and 4) short- and long-term bicycle parking.


11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.Q.4 – Per UDC 7.4.6.H.1., barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings. On the site plan, clearly identify the location and type of barrier proposed for parking along the east side of the building.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.Q.4 – The proposed building obstructs the parking space directly to the south. Either reconfigure the design or remove the parking space.

4.7.S Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.S –Per the TSM Section 7-01.4.0.4.1.B, a sidewalk or pedestrian refuge area is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. On the site plan, provide a striped pedestrian refuge area that's a minimum width of 4 feet adjacent to the proposed water station.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.S – Per TSM 7-01.4.0.4.2.A., the pedestrian refuge area must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit revised drawings and any corrected plans along with a detailed response letter, stating how all Site Zoning Review comments were addressed.

**Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.

***For additional information on the standards presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Olga Salazar at Olga.Salazar@tucsonaz.gov
09/30/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added Addressing, PAG, SWG, USPS, TEP to the workflow. FYI notice sent out to PAG, SWG, USPS, TEP.
09/30/2026 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
09/30/2026 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Good afternoon,

Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0926-00242.

Thank you,






David Wilging

Planner I - Addressing Division

Pima County Development Services

201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor

Tucson, Arizona 85701

520-724-6381
09/30/2026 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
09/30/2026 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
09/30/2026 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
10/28/2026 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
09/29/2026 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
09/28/2026 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
10/22/2026 ROW Engineering Review Standard REVIEW COMPLETED