Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0926-00239
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/05/2026 | NPPO Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 10/05/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 10/09/2026 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/21/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0926-00239 (1st Review) Project: installation of a new approximately 22'-6" x 57'-0" freestanding solar parking canopy at the existing Monument East Veterinary Hospital. The proposed work includes construction of the steel canopy structure and foundations within the existing parking area, installation of photovoltaic modules on the canopy roof, associated electrical equipment and underground conduit, grounding and bonding, and required vehicle-impact protection for electrical equipment. Existing site access and veterinary hospital operations will remain. Parking layout, property-line setbacks, structural-leg locations, and canopy clearances will be coordinated as part of this Development Package. Location: 1051 N HARRISON RD Review Date: 9/21/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate & Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov & joe.macaulay@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0926-00239) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.4.3] 2. Provide the page number and total number of pages within the Development Package plan set (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on the bottom right corner of each page. [AM 2-06.4.2.D]. 3. public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.” [AM 2-06.4.7.D] 4. Provide the general note: “Any Proposed signs will be approved per separate permit” [AM 2-06.4.7] 5. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.” [AM 2-06.4.7.B.3] 6. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General note: “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.” [AM 2-06.4.7.B.1] 7. Significant clarification required – How will trash management be completed for this site? As currently proposed, it appears the solar canopy will be installed where the existing trash dumpsters are placed on site. It will need to be demonstrated that waste management is still able to be managed for this site. a. For resubmission, it will need to be shown on the site plan where a potentially new waste enclosure will be located |
||
| 10/09/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey Cassidy – Planner I PDSD Current Zoning Section, Site Zoning-Commercial Review PROJECT: New 22'-6 x 57'-0 freestanding solar parking canopy at Monument East Veterinary Hospital Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0926-00239 1051 N HARRISON RD TUCSON, AZ 85748 C-1 ZONING TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 09, 2026 Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is September 09, 2027. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 1. COMMENT: Include the missing section corners, and the section, township, and range within the project-location map on the G-100 sheet. (AM 2-06.4.1.A.3). 2. COMMENT: Provide missing Legal Description on G-100 sheet: HARRISON ESTATES AMENDED THAT PT OF LOT 1 LYIJG S OF A LINE THAT IS 208' M/L S OF N LINE OF LOT 1 EXC E35' THEREOF & TRI PORTION OF LOT 2 LYING IN SE COR THEREOF. (AM 2-06.4.1.B.2). 3. COMMENT: A title block on each sheet that includes the page number and total number of pages within the Development Package plan set (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on the bottom right corner of each page. (AM 2-06.4.1.B.5). 4. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0926-00239, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. (AM 2-06.4.1.B.6). 5. COMMENT: On the G-100 sheet, provide a general note that states “Existing Zoning is C-1”. (AM 2-06.4.2.A). 6. COMMENT: List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage on the G-100 sheet. (AM 2-06.4.2.C). 7. COMMENT: Add the Existing and Proposed Use to the G-100 sheet – Commercial Use Group, Animal Service per Use Specific Standard(s) 4.9.4.D.1, .2, .3, & .4 and 4.9.13.O or 4.9.4.D.7 & 4.9.4.D.10-.15 (AM 2-06.4.2.D). 8. COMMENT: On the G-100 sheet, add general note(s) indicating that this development is subject to the Major Streets and Routes per UDC 5.4 (AM 2-06.4.2.F). 9. COMMENT: Provide the total square feet of principal or accessory building(s) as well as the percentage of building area and vehicular use area lot coverage. (AM 2-06.4.2.H). 10. COMMENT: The total building square footage for this Animal Service use appears to be 3,933 square feet (building and shed); The parking calculation for this use paired with the square footage equates to requiring 10 vehicle parking spaces. The proposed solar canopy removes three of those existing (and required) 10 spaces, indicate on the site plan where the three lost spaces will be relocated (AM 2-06.4.2.J). The site plan incorrectly labels the proposed structure as a carport. Remove Carport from this label unless you can demonstrate 8’-6” wide x 18’-0” long parking spaces can be achieved with the proposed canopy ‘east structural leg’. 11. COMMENT: On the G-100 sheet, provide the general note: “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.” (AM 2-06.4.3.A). 12. COMMENT: On the G-100 sheet, provide the general note: “Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.” (AM 2-06.4.3.D). 13. COMMENT: On the G-100 sheet, provide the general note. “Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.” (AM 2-06.4.4.D). 14. COMMENT: Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, to go with the distances you have already provided (AM 2-06.4.7.A). 15. COMMENT: Provide missing zoning (labels) for all surrounding / adjacent parcels (Including across the right of way for N Harrison Rd) (AM 2-06.4.7.F). 16. COMMENT: Illustrate or provide notes on all applicable building setback lines. (2-06.4.7.G) 17. COMMENT: In the footprint of the buildings on the site plan sheet, provide the heights of both the principal structure and shed (AM 2-06.4.7.H). 18. COMMENT: If applicable, demonstrate any applicable existing (refer to Title Report) and proposed easements and recordation information (AM 2-06 4.7.I). 19. COMMENT: On the site plan, update the label from shed to wall in the lower southeast corner of the property as 2026 aerial imagery indicates this is an open, walled in space as opposed to an enclosed shed as currently labeled. (AM 2-06.4.7.M). 20. COMMENT: As a result of the proposed location of the solar canopy, access to the existing trash/recycling location is now blocked. Indicate on the site where the new location will relocated to while demonstrating appropriate vehicle maneuverability, screening and materials. (AM 2-06.4.7.U). 21. COMMENT: For N Harrison Rd, provide public or private label and recordation type on the site plan sheet. (AM 2-06.4.7.V.1). 22. COMMENT: The site plan incorrectly labels the proposed structure as a carport. Remove Carport from this label unless you can demonstrate 8’-6” wide x 18’-0” long parking spaces can be achieved with the proposed canopy ‘east structural leg’. 23. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other PDSD reviewer comments. 24. COMMENT: Combine PDF’s provided into one PDF document upon next resubmittal. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit revised drawings and any corrected plans along with a detailed response letter, stating how all Site Zoning Review comments were addressed. **Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. ***For additional information on the standards presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 09/14/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/17/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC Sent FYI Notice to TEP | ||
| 10/08/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/08/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/14/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/16/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/09/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | no impact to ROW |