Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0924-00263
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/04/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The sewer structure labeled 8437-12 on sheet 6 of 11 is actually 8437*12, an of the line cleanout. The next upstream manhole is 6951-01, with a rim elevation of 2467.42’. All of the buildings have an FFE that is more than 12” above the rim elevation of MH 6951-01 and may not have a backwater valve. | ||
| 11/19/2024 | Design Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0924-00263 11/19/2024 1. Per Administrative Manual 2-06.5.3.F – A Privacy Mitigation Plan (PMP) is required for this development. Zoning will forward the PMP to the Design Professional for review for compliance with UDC 8.7.3.M.2. For any questions regarding this submittal, please contact zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/08/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Site Landscape Comments. Thank you. Chad Keller, PLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/02/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide lot combination documentation. 2. Provide Elevation and building plan footprints for pedestrian circulation review. Further comments may be resulting from provided documentation. Joshua Garcia joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/08/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: PIMA STREET MULT-FAMILY - AN FLD DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0924-00263 ADDRESS: 3726 E PIMA ST ZONING: R-2 RESIDENCE ZONE LAND USE: MULTIFAMILY/FLD This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Add the summary totals of protected native plants to be preserved, transplanted and mitigated on the NPPO and the Planting Plan. This has been helpful in the review process on project that the summary has been included on the plan. 2. Label all property lines as well as existing and future ROWs if applicable on landscape plans. 3. Provide an irrigation sleeve across the ADA ramp directly north of unit number 1 on the irrigation plan. 4. Add functional open space calculation on the planting plan, required and provided square footage numbers. If this FLD is exempt, then state the reason for the exemption. 5. Per FLD requirements in UDC 8.7.3 letter H, Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements. Provide a calculation for the 1 tree for every 40 feet linear feet of pedestrian circulation provided and show how those trees are incorporated into the sites pedestrian circulation system or within the functional open space areas. If the trees are accounted for elsewhere on site, example: additional trees in the interior landscape border or extra parking area trees, then call that out with the calculation. 6. Provide additional leader callouts to the planting areas that will be depressed for water harvesting. Differentiate between the civil WH basins and the general landscape areas that will be depressed. Examples: Parking lot tree planting areas and interior landscape border areas. They only need to be depressed and receive water from rainfall, no purposeful grading and curb cuts for these depressed landscape areas. 7. Add a detail for trees planted in the hand placed riprap on a slope if that is the intention with some of the tree plantings. 8. Add protective fencing detail for preserve in place trees near the hand placed riprap within the civil WH basins. Show the fence graphically on the planting plan and call it out. 9. One of the trees in the west interior landscape border is placed very close to the curb. Adjust the tree placement. 10. Provide a multi-trunk tree detail with no stakes and callout to remove the nursery stake. 11. Tree staking notes are included in the tree planting detail. Should a time period advisement for removal of tree stakes for contractor/owner clarity be added to the detail and the general landscape or maintenance notes? This is something I’ve been noticing out on finished project sites. The staking cinch-ties have been constricting and damaging newly planted trees due to never being removed as the tree is maturing. 12. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 13. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0924-00263, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov or at 520.837.4923 |
||
| 11/13/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Pima Street Multi-Family Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0924-00263 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 13, 2024 DUE DATE: October 31, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 1, 2025. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0924-00263, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Remove case number, DP21-0356, from sheets 8 – 1 as the DP has expired and is no longer applicable. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Remove the reference to “.D, .F, .G, .H & .1” from Zoning and Land Use Note 5 as this project is not limited to these UDC Articles and is required to meet all requirements of UDC Article 8.7.3. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide the square footage for each type dwelling unit proposed. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – The site coverage calculation shall clearly show the square footage of building structures, and vehicle use area within the calculation. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – Clearly show all property lines on sheet 4. It appears that some of the proposed development may be located on adjacent property. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Show the 20’-0” Ingress/Egress Easement that runs along the north property line of parcel 122-18-046B on the plan. It appears that proposed development is within this easement. Either the proposed development will need to be removed from the easement, or the easement will need to be abandoned. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is made up of four (4) parcels, 122-18-0490, 122-18-0500, 122-18-0470, & 122-18-046B, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessor’s Consolidation Request Form, found at: https://www.asr.pima.gov/Forms?tab=Misc, with the next submittal. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per :UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. As vehicles will be allowed to access the area around the proposed basketball court clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met for this area. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per TSM Section 10-01.5.1.A.1 Lines of sight will not be obscured between 30 inches and six feet through a triangular area adjacent to a driveway, a PAAL, an alley, or a street, where such access ways intersect with another street in a T-configuration. The northernmost parallel vehicle parking space encroaches into the SVT and will need to be removed from the SVT. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide the square footage of the proposed studio dwelling unit, see comment 4, so that the vehicle parking requirement can be verified. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Clarify what the proposed reduction list is as UDC Article 7.4.5.E.7.1 does not exist. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.11 for the required EV Ready & EV Capable requirements. Also, include the required and provided within the vehicle parking space calculation. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on the plan or detail how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met for the short-term bicycle parking. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – As street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for Pima St. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) Either design this site to meet the future right- of-way requirements or provide a future right-of-way plan that clearly demonstrate how this site will meet requirements to the future right-of-way along with a recorded MS&R covenant. The covenant can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/government/departments/transportation-and-mobility/dtm/documents/linked-documents/maps-and-records/major_streets_covenant.pdf 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setback listed under Development Package Calculation #3 is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.a and provide the correct street perimeter yard setback. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC Article 8.7.3.K.1 1. Perimeter yards along FLD project site boundaries are required in accordance the site ’s underlying zone as provided in Section 6.3.4, Dimensional Standards and Exceptions Tables. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a wall height measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. Based on the parapet height of 27’ the required perimeter yard setback is 20’-3”. It does not appear that the perimeter yard setbacks are met along the north, south and east property lines. Provide building elevations with the next submittal so that perimeter yard setback requirements can be verified. A Design Development Options may be required. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a setback dimension from the post supporting what appears to be shade sails within the proposed “OUTDOOR LOUNG” shown along the eastern property line, to the east property line. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and height of what appears to be shade sails within the proposed “OUTDOOR LOUNG” shown along the eastern property line. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Demonstrate how mail delivery will be addressed for this site. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating all signage requires separate permits. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 23. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.B – Clearly demonstrate how this site qualifies for the Maximum Density Option. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – Clearly delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the development package along with the square footage of each area. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D – Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.F – A Privacy Mitigation Plan is required for this development. Additional comments 27. COMMENT: It appears that you are proposing a site wall along the west property line on the adjacent property. This wall will require a separate permit and some type of construction easement. 28. COMMENT: The density calculation shall take into account the future right-of -way requirements. Review UDC Article 5.4.5.D.. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 09/24/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/03/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Addressing and TEP PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 10/03/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 11/05/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0924-00263 Pima ST Multi-Family. |
||
| 10/03/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 12/02/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | December 2, 2024 WO#T129900 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Pima Street Multi-Family TD-DEV-0924-00263 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 10/3/2024. There are existing facilities within the development which are not depicted upon the plan. There are possible conflicts with an overhead pole line. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Martin Salazar (520) 305-6713 msalazar@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 10/03/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/31/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/01/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/02/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/09/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | DTM has no comments. | ||
| 11/21/2024 | Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED |