Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.4
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0923-00407
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.4
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/26/2024 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 03/18/2024 | Fire New Construction | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 04/03/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/02/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 219 W GRANT RD – 7’-0” Site Wall Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0923-00407 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 2, 2024 DUE DATE: March 31, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 11, 2025. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the phone number and email address for the owner listed on the plan. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) with in the title block.. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0923-00407, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.5 - 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 – 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – As a general note identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Grant Rd is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – As this site is made up of three (3) parcels, 115-05-063A, 115-05-064A & 115-05-065A, either separate permits are required for each lot or a lot combination is required. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – The plan shows 4 parcels when the site is only made up of 3. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 02/29/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/14/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | ADOT, Historic and Design review required. Review request email sent per ADOT. CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG, TEP. | ||
| 03/22/2024 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good Afternoon, ADOT has no comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review. |
||
| 03/14/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG and TEP. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 03/14/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG and TEP. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 03/14/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG and TEP. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 03/14/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG and TEP. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 03/12/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/28/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |