Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0923-00384
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/18/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 12/22/2023 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 12/22/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 12/27/2023 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 12/27/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 12/21/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Wyatt Berger Lead Planner PROJECT: 3333 E Grant Rd Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-0923-00384 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 21, 2023 DUE DATE: December 27, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06, and the Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. The new one-year expiration date is December 21, 2024. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – This comment was not addressed. The development package documents are designed to allow for concurrent review of any site-related reviews only. Remove the floor plan from the submitted development package documents. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENT 2. 2-06.3.10 – Ensure that the legend on the cover sheet matches the symbols depicted on the site plan. The water and sewer lines depicted on the site plan correspond with the symbols for a roadway centerline and an existing easement. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – As both parcels are considered to be a single site, provide a lot consolidation request approved by the Pima County Recorder’s Office or a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real property: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/covenant-regarding-development-and-use-of-real-property-udc-with-release.pdf. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – This comment was not addressed. “Commercial Services: Sales of Spirituous Liquor in Conjunction with Food Service” is not a use defined within the UDC. The correct use is Food Service, with Alcoholic Beverage Service as an accessory use. The use-specific standard provided is also incorrect and should be corrected to 4.9.4.V.1, .3, and .5-.9, 4.9.4.C.3, and 4.9.13.O. 5. COMMENT: 2-06-4.7.A.4 – Clarify whether a Food Court use is proposed on the site. Please note that additional development standards will apply to the site if a Food Court use is proposed. 2-06.4.8 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – Based on the legend provided on the cover sheet, as well as based on the information provided on the site plan, a property line that does not exist is depicted running from north to south. Remove this property line from the site plan. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Based on the legend provided on the cover sheet, easements along the east and west lot lines are depicted on the site plan. Provide the recordation information, location, width, and purpose of these easements. If these easements are not in use and are proposed for vacation, provide the abandonment information. 2-06.4.9 INFORMATION ON PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – Clarify why the location of the “New R/W Per Grant Rd Plan” does not match the location of the south lot line. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – This comment was not entirely addressed. As Grant Road is designated as an arterial on the Major Streets and Routes Plan Map with a 120’ future right-of-way width, show the future right-of-way, future curb and sidewalk, and future sight visibility triangles on the site plan. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Indicate the width of the two-way access lane providing ingress and egress to the site. The minimum required width for this access lane is 20 feet (UDC Table 7.4.6-2). 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The location of the future ingress and egress location conflicts with the proposed PAAL and motor vehicle parking spaces. Please note that as a change of use is proposed, full code compliance is required. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide some sort barrier such as curbing or post barricades to prevent vehicles from driving onto or obstructing the flush pedestrian circulation area (UDC 7.4.6.H.1). 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – This comment was not entirely addressed. Wheel stop curbing is required in a vehicular use area to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings (UDC 7.4.6.H.1). The proposed wheel stop curbing is two and one-half feet from the front of the accessible parking spaces; however, the proposed handicap accessible signage is located within the vehicular use area. The signage will need to be placed within the pedestrian circulation area and shall maintain an unobstructed clearance of 84”. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – This comment has not yet been addressed. A portion of at least one of the southernmost parking spaces is located within the right-of-way. All required motor vehicle parking must be located on-site (UDC 7.4.6.B). The number of provided motor vehicle parking spaces may not include any existing parking spaces located within the public right-of-way. Additionally, per UDC 7.4.6.K, a street or alley cannot be used for maneuvering directly into or from the two parking spaces located perpendicular to the access lane. 15. COMMENT: 2-006.4.9.H.5.a – The accessible parking space proposed adjacent to the waste enclosure does not meet the requirements of IBC 1106.6. Accessible parking spaces shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible building entrance. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – This comment has not yet been addressed. Zoning cannot verify the parking requirement until a consistent gross floor area calculation is given. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – This comment has not yet been addressed. Zoning cannot verify the bicycle parking requirement until a consistent gross floor area calculation is given. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5-d – Keynote 17 indicates 15 short-term bicycle parking spaces are proposed; however, the site plan only indicates 14 short-term spaces. Clarify the discrepancy. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Notate the surfacing of the bicycle parking area (UDC 7.4.9.B.1.d). Stabilized decomposed granite is an acceptable surface material for bicycle parking areas. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate that all short-term bicycle parking spaces are within 50 feet of each public entrance to a building (see UDC Figure 7.4.9-A). 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – This comment has not yet been addressed. The square footage of each building and structure on the site plan differs from the square footage shown on the reference floor plan and within General Notes 5 and 17. Ensure consistency throughout. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – This comment has not yet been addressed. Per TSM 7-01.4.2.A, sidewalks associated with PAALs must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means, except at designated crosswalks. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – This comment was not addressed. See Zoning comment relating to wheel stop curbing. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at (520) 837-4951. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 11/27/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/27/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/18/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |