Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0923-00383
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/16/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 10/16/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. A separate permit is required for the installation of a private sewer collection system and will require a review of the system design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality as well as a building permit from the City of Tucson. Reference Title 18, R18-9-E302, 4.02 General Permit, Arizona Administrative Code. 2. Revise the site drawing to include the invert and rim elevations of the new manholes. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 3. Determine the need for any backwater valves for the buildings per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
||
| 10/05/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Width of turnaround needs to be 20'. Currently 16'. -Add fire dept no parking signs to turnaround. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/10/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Landscape Comments. | ||
| 10/06/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0923-00383 (429 E YAVAPAI RD TUCSON, AZ 85705) Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. Comments: 1. SDG 5-10 - Please use a 10’ radius on the curb returns along E Yavapai Rd. 2. SDG 3-14 - Where sidewalks cross driveways, the sidewalk should be dominant, maintaining the level, slope, and material of the sidewalk. Email me for examples. 3. AM 2-06.4.8.C – Please dimension the width of existing and proposed curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks and provide offset dimensions between these elements and the ROW. 4. P. A. G. SD 207 - Ensure that the sidewalk jogs laterally at a slope no sharper than 3:1, longitudinal to lateral. 5. TSM 10-01.4.1.A.1.a - Sidewalk should maintain a 5’ width for the entire frontage of E Yavapai Rd., even when meandering around existing utility pole. 6. Please include a call out note indicating that the sidewalks should end level with surrounding grade. 7. TSM 10-01.4.3.B Please use a P. A. G. SD 206 driveway apron instead of curb returns. Tie into existing curb with P. A. G. SD 211. 8. Existing Improvements Keynotes #3, #4, and #5 on page 3/13 are missing explanations. 9. Ensure the keynote references on page 3 refer to the correct corresponding detail and page. 10. Please add a general note: A Right-of-Way (ROW) Permit - Development/Building is required prior to construction within the ROW. Apply for this permit within the subrecords tab on TDC Online. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov Abbreviations: City of Tucson Code (COTC), Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM), Technical Standards Manual (TSM), Street Design Guide (SDG), Pima Association of Governments Standard Details (P. A. G. SD), Access Management Guidelines (AMG), Major Streets and Routes Plan (MS&R). |
||
| 10/13/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. A pedestrian circulation path to the trash enclosure required. 2. The trash enclosure detail does not match the standards found in Technical Standards Manual section 8-01. Revise to match or reach out to Environmental Services for approval. 3. This site is within a critical basin and is subject to critical basin detention which is a reduction in peak discharge from existing condition by 15%. Clarify in the drainage report that this is being met. 4. Show that this site is meeting first flush retention requirements. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/10/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0923-00383 PROJECT: YAVAPAI CONDOS ADDRESS/PARCEL: 429 E YAVAPAI RD/MANY ZONING: R-3 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments, and concerns are addressed before landscape section approval. 2. Include a clearer set of landscape plans, if necessary reach out to the records dept, PDSD_Inquiries@tucsonaz.gov for a better set. This current set is incredibly hard to read. 3. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0923-00383, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 4. There must be a NPPO or NPPO waiver. An NPPO is required per UDC 7.7.3-B. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted or approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the UDC and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. 5. Label all site visibility triangles & ROWs on all sheets. 6. DTM approval is required for any and all planting or irrigation in the ROW prior to the approval of the development package. Reach out to David Marhefka (David.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) , if necessary for this project 7. All landscape plans shall incorporate water conserving design as defined in UDC Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual 5.01-5.11. 8. The Landscape Plan should match the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan and the Grading Plan, if site grading is to happen. The landscape plan should have spot elevations in the detention/retention areas and in all water harvesting areas in the Landscape Plan. 9. Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required per UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.3.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. Using Low Impact Development design and water harvesting provides critical basin detention and first flush retention for all new development and impervious area. The newly adopted Detention/Retention Manual can be found: https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-final-201406-manual.pdf With CoT edits to the manual are found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 10. The Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan must utilize the Site Water Budget (located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Building-Safety/Water-Energy-Conservation). See TSM 4-01.0.0 Exhibit A. The Site Water Budget is how the Water Dept tracks the irrigation water use on-site, not first flush retention volume charts. 11. Show spot grades in WHIAs PER tsm 4-01.4.3.2C 3a-iii 12. Label all downspouts/splash pads on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 10/06/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Yavapai Condominiums Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0923-00383 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 6, 2023 DUE DATE: October 13, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 10, 2024. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Remove the electrical sheets from the plan as they are not site related and will not be review for compliance with the electrical code(s). 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index shall include all sheets submitted in the tentative plat. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the phone number and email address for the owner listed on sheet 1. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C – Revise the title block to include the number of units, common elements and & limited common elements. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The page number and total number of pages shall be provided on all sheets of the TP and include all sheets submitted. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0923-00383, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – Revise Site Note 2 to include the square footage of the TP. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide a general note that identifies the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Clarify what the proposed use is. The title block talks about condominiums but under Permitting Note 4 you talk about single-family dwelling. If this is truly going to be condominiums the site shall be developed as multi-family. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 – As a general note provide the total number of units/lots proposed. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.7 – Provide the final plat case number, S05-117, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information regarding Yavapai Rd. dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Fully dimension the back-up spur shown at the north end of the vehicle use area, UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a dimension from the PAAL to the wall along the west property line, UDC Article 7.4.6.f.2.b. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until the use is clarified vehicle parking requirements cannot be verified. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include the number required and provided and will also include the number of accessible spaces required and provided along with the number of van accessible spaces required and provided. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for both a standard and accessible vehicle parking space. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.11 & .12 are met. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until the use is clarified short- & long-term bicycle parking cannot be verified. parking requirements cannot be verified. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a bicycle parking space calculation for both the short- & long-term bicycle parking that provides the number required and provided. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – As the short- & long-term bicycle parking will be required provide a detail for both the demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. Based on the height listed under permitting note 2, 24’ the required perimeter yard setback to the east property line is 18’. 22. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of the proposed structures within the foot print. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Clarify how mail delivery will be handled. If a gang mailbox is proposed show it on the plan. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 26. COMMENT: 2-06.5.2.A – 27. COMMENT: 2-06.5.2.B – 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 28. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.A – 29. COMMENT: -06.5.3.B – 30. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – 31. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D – 32. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.E – 33. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.E.1 – 34. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.E.2 – 35. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.F – 36. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.F.1 – 37. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.F.2 – 38. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.F.3 – 39. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.1 – 40. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.2 - If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 09/06/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/13/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | Per SOP Addressing is required. Request email sent per ADOT, FYI email sent per SOP. | ||
| 10/13/2023 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | [EXTERNAL] Re: DUE OCT 13TH, 2023 / YAVAPAI CONDOMINIUMS, SITE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BASED ON APPROVED PLAT S05-117 / TD-DEV-0923-00383 Jay Gomes CDRC Good Morning, ADOT has no comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review. |
||
| 09/13/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per SOP. | ||
| 10/16/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing does not need to review this project. The units were previously addressed during the plat review in 2007. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 09/13/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per SOP. | ||
| 09/13/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per SOP. | ||
| 09/13/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per SOP. | ||
| 09/11/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/07/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/11/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |