Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0826-00218
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2026 | NPPO Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 09/01/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 09/10/2026 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/01/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Show the location of the fire dept. connections on the drawings. Verify the FDC is not inside the fenced area or obstructed by the shipping containers. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 08/31/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0826-00218 (1st Review) Project: Shipping Containers and Chain Link Fence Location: 9495 E SPEEDWAY BL Review Date: 8/31/2026 Reviewer: Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer – Site Development Reviewer Contact Information: joe.macaulay@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: TC-FBB-0526-00060 Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0826-00218, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. Please revise sheet count at the bottom right corner to show correct total sheet number (Sheet 1 of 2 & Sheet 2 of 2). 3. Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least 2 feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over 6-inches. [UDC 7.4.6.F.2.b.] a. Please revise layout to provide the required 2-foot setback in addition to the required 24-foot 2-way PAAL width. [UDC 7.4.6-2] 4. Permit TC-FBB-0526-00060 site plan must match what is proposed on the Development Package (TD-DEV-0826-00218). 5. Site Engineering will be unable to approve permit TC-FBB-0526-00060 until the associated Development Package (DP) permit is approved. |
||
| 09/03/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey Cassidy – Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Placement of 2 permanent shipping containers & installation of an 8' tall chain link fence Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0826-00218 9495 E SPEEDWAY BL TUCSON, AZ 85710 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 03, 2026 Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is August 06, 2027. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 1. COMMENT: A title block on each sheet that includes the page number and total number of pages within the Development Package plan set (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on the bottom right corner of each page (AM 2-06.4.1.B.5). 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0826-00218, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. (AM 2-06.4.1.B.6). 3. COMMENT: Update the Existing and Proposed Use listed to Retail Use Group – General Merchandise Sales per Use Specific Standard(s) 4.9.9.B.3 and 4.9.13.O. (AM 2-06.4.2.D). 4. COMMENT: Add general note(s) indicating that this development is subject to the Major Streets and Routes UDC 5.4 (AM 2-06.4.2.F). 5. COMMENT: The total square footage of the building does not include the existing open drive-thru canopy so the existing building total should remain at 15,437 sf number (for use in calculating the required vehicle parking). (AM 2-06.4.2.H). 6. COMMENT: The total square footage of the proposed containers (included in the revised overall building square footage) is approximately 478 sf so the existing building total should be closer to 15, 915 sf (for use in calculating the required vehicle parking). (AM 2-06.4.2.H). 7. COMMENT: Update the expansion percentage to 3% (478 / 15, 547 x 100 = 3%). (AM 2-06.4.2.I). 8. COMMENT: The revised (new) building square footage (3% expansion) is now 15, 915 approximately. 15, 915 / 300 parking spaces = 53 required spaces. Update this from the currently listed 52. (AM 2-06.4.2.J) 9. COMMENT: Provide this missing note. List the following notes on all plans/plats: “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.” (AM 2-06.4.3.A). 10. COMMENT: Provide this missing note. “Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.” (AM 2-06.4.3.D). 11. COMMENT: Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, to go with the distances you have already provided (AM 2-06.4.7.A). 12. COMMENT: Illustrate or provide notes on all applicable building setback lines. (2-06.4.7.G) 13. COMMENT: In the footprint(s) of the shipping containers on the site plan sheet, provide the square footage and heights (AM 2-06.4.7.H). 14. COMMENT: If applicable, demonstrate any applicable existing and proposed easements and recordation information (AM 2-06 4.7.I). 15. COMMENT: Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least 2 feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over 6-inches. Please revise layout to provide the required 2-foot setback in addition to the required 24-foot 2-way PAAL width [UDC 7.4.6.F.2.b.] (AM 2-06.4.7.Q.4) 16. COMMENT:– Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other PDSD reviewer comments. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit revised drawings and any corrected plans along with a detailed response letter, stating how all Site Zoning Review comments were addressed. **Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. ***For additional information on the standards presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/06/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/13/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TEP to the workflow. FYI notice sent out to TEP. | ||
| 09/03/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/10/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/06/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/10/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/09/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED |