Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0825-00229
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2026 | NPPO Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 02/10/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide the location of the existing HCS/BCS with a dimension from either a property line or the nearest public sanitary manhole. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Keynote 32 calls out a 4” building sewer connecting to an existing 6” HCS/BCS, but the keynote is not shown. Where is the connection located? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018 and Section 708.1.5, IPC 2018. 3. Show the locations of the cleanouts for the building sewer. Reference: Sections 708.1.1 and 708.1.3, IPC 2018 and Pima County Standard Detail RWRD 401, 2021. 4. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (9858-182, 2339.55) is higher than the first-floor elevation (2338.5). Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
||
| 01/26/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TD-DEV-0825-00229 Location: 2545 N FAIRVIEW AV Review Date: 1/26/2026 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0825-00229, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. As the development package TD-DEV-0825-00229 has yet to see full approval, please remove all revision bubbles and deltas around changes made as they are not considered after approval revisions. 3. The sheet index provided on the cover sheet has 8 sheets called out but the Development package file is only 5 pages. Revise accordingly. 4. Revise the plan set to provide Sight visibility triangles for all the site entrances, along Alvernon Way and Holmes ST in compliance with TSM 10-01.5.0. They should be found on the site plan (sheet 3) and not as a separate detail. NOTE: Fairview AV is designated as a Collector RD. This designation will be used for Table 5.3. 5. Clearly show all downspouts and sidewalk scuppers. to ensure that stormwater from roof drains, up to and including flow from the ten-year storm event, does not pass over sidewalks per Technical Standards Manual 7-01.4.3E. This includes downspouts not associated with a sidewalk or scupper. They are required to match with the associated building permit construction plans. 6. Wheel stops will be required at all parking spaces adjacent to the sidewalks so as not to reduce the sidewalk path to less than 4 feet. UDC 7.4.6 Sidewalks that are 6 and a half feet or wider will not require adjacent parking spaces to have wheel stops. This will need to be demonstrated for all parking spaces along the Building East side. 7. Provide dimensions for the PAAL, parking spaces, & sidewalks/pathways on the site plan (Sheet 3). 8. Keynote #19 on sheet 3, appears to be unused, please revise to clearly call-out proposed fencing/gate. 9. Revise trash enclosure details and grading plan to show the ramp slope being 2% away from enclosure as well as the enclosure slab sloping 1% to the gate. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/13/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: NEW WAREHOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED PARKING LOT ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0825-00229 ADDRESS: 2545 N FAIRVIEW AV ZONING: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE (I-1) LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 02.13.2026 THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM). RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. UDC 7.6.2. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this section apply to the following: A. All new developments 2. A landscape plan set is required. Preparation of the landscape plans shall adhere to UDC 7.6 and Administrative Manual 2-10. 3. Parking lot canopy trees are required at 1 tree for every 4 parking spaces, see UDC 7.6.4.B. Structurally covered parking spaces do not count toward the ratio, see UDC 7.6.4.B.1.c.(8). Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, see UDC 7.6.4.1.a.(1). See Technical Standards Manual 5-01.3.0 for additional landscaping in vehicular use area requirements. 4. An interior landscape border is required on a portion of the north and a portion of the south property lines directly adjacent to the O-3 Office Zone. This 10’ border includes a 5’ wall along the property line and the required trees. See UDC 7.6.4.C-2 and Table 7.6.4-1. See UDC 7.6.4.C. Industrial land use adjacent to Office zone. 5. A street landscape border is required along N Fairview Av, per UDC 7.6.4.C-2 and Table 7.6.4-1. See UDC 7.6.4.C. Industrial land use along MS&R and non-MS&R requires a 10’ street landscape border that includes a 5’ screen. 6. A drip irrigation plan and details are required for all proposed landscape planting areas. 7. DTM review is required for all planting and irrigation in the ROW prior to the approval of the development package. Reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) for review and approval if applicable for this project. 8. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required: See Technical Standards Manual 4-01.3.0 RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN. A Rainwater Harvesting Plan shall be submitted with all applications for commercial developments at which landscaping is required. This site includes a commercial scale impervious parking area and required landscape plantings. Due to these requirements a commercial rainwater harvesting plan and calculations will need to be provided for review and approval. 9. Coordinate the Landscape Plan, Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan and the Civil Grading Plans to have identical basin size, grades/percent slopes, spot elevations and curb cut inlet and outlet locations. 10. Maximize rainwater harvesting across the site into all landscape areas, including the street landscape borders and planting islands for the required trees in the parking area. 11. A separate irrigation water meter is required. Please label irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. See TSM 4-01.6.0. Or see City of Tucson Ordinance 10597 -- Sec. 6-182. Rainwater Harvesting Plan: Number 3 (a) A separate water meter connected to the main water supply; or (b) An irrigation sub-meter. 12. **If it is determined that any of the above provided site landscape standards cannot be met due to the nature of the development, then a Design Development Option (DDO) may be an option to gain partial relief from some landscape requirements, see UDC 3.11.1.B.3 for landscape and screening modifications allowed. A Board of Adjustment Variance to the UDC site landscape requirements is also a viable alternative. Please reach out to Mark Castro or Georgia Pennington with PDSD for more information on the DDO and Variance process. Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov – Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |
||
| 02/17/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bobby Parsons PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Warehouse Building - 2545 N. Fairview Ave. Tucson, AZ 85705 Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0825-00229 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/17/2026 DUE DATE: 2/13/2026 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 22, 2027. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index refers to 8 sheets however only 5 sheets were included. Please include all sheets in the sheet index or update the index to correctly identify the sheets submitted as noted by the standard above. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – The plans were stamped by John Feneck however his contact information was not included as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Make sure the sheet index and the total number of pages are accurately reflected in the page numbering as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The Section, Township, and range are incorrectly labeled. Please update as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Please include all Use Specific Standards associated with the proposed General Manufacturing use as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – Please show the sight visibility triangles as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Please dimension the PAAL’s as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The proposed use was classified as General Manufacturing on Sheet 1 however the parking calculation refers to Wholesale as the proposed use which is parked differently. Please clearly identify the proposed use and the associated parking requirements as noted by the standard above (UDC Table 7.4.4-1). Also, please clearly identify the required ADA parking spaces in your parking table (At least 1 of every 6 parking spaces must be van accessible). 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – As a loading zone is being proposed, please include the type of loading zone as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – As General Manufacturing falls under the Industrial land use group, short term bicycle parking is not required. Please update the table as it currently reads 2 short term bicycle parking spaces are required. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Under “Site Data”, the required setbacks are listed incorrectly. The rear (West) setback is listed as 1 ½ (Height) however the parcel to the West is zoned I-1 (nonresidential use) so the setback should be listed as 0’. Also, the front street setback is listed as 0’ however for nonresidential abutting a collector street, the setback is 10’. Please update the table accordingly. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Please include the proposed use within the footprint of the building as noted by the standard above. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 01/23/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | EXTERNAL REVIEWERS CDRC added: TEP, ADOT, SWG, USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent toTEP, ADOT and FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG. |
||
| 02/10/2026 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | ADOT has no comments on this development. It will not generate enough trips to significantly impact the ADOT roadway system. Thanks, Rick Freije |
||
| 01/23/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 01/23/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 02/10/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | 4350 E. Irvington Road Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 February 10, 2026 WO#T174798 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: WAREHOUSE BUILDING TD-DEV-0825-00229 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 1/23/2026. There are no existing facilities within the development.There are no apparent conflicts at this time. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Chuck Leon (520) 400-6133 cleon@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 01/23/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 02/13/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/22/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/28/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | No ROW improvements required |