Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0825-00225
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Commercial Plumbing Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Design Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Landscape Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Zoning Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/26/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TD-DEV-0825-00225 Location: 517 N 4TH AV Review Date: 1/26/2026 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Comments: 1. Wheel stops will be required at all parking spaces adjacent to the sidewalks so as not to reduce the sidewalk path to less than 4 feet. UDC 7.4.6.H & TSM 7-01.4.2. This will need to be demonstrated for all parking spaces on the north parking spaces. 2. It will be required that the swale proposed abutting the south of the new proposed building be grouted. This should be noted/call-out on the plans as well as construction detail #5. This is due to proximity to both proposed structure as well as existing structure to the south – infiltration into the ground associated with both building foundations will not be allowed. 3. Show the 2ft minimum grading setback from the property line on the grading plan TSM 2-01.9.0. Demonstrate this along the southern portion of the development. A reduced setback will require geotechnical justification that no adverse impacts will be caused by the proximity of grading and drainage infrastructure within the minimum 2-foot setback. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/28/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | ROW permit required prior to working in the ROW. Pedestrian access easement will be required for public sidewalk in private property. |