Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0825-00211
Parcel: 10610129A

Address:
2023 W PRICE ST

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0825-00211
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/17/2025 Commercial Plumbing Standard APPROVED
09/24/2025 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard APPROVED WO#T161229
City of Tucson
Planning and Development
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: W Price Auto Shop
TD-DEV-0825-00211
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted 8/25/2026. There are existing facilities within the development which are
depicted upon the plan. There are no apparent conflicts at this time.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department,
LandReviews@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Fred Quintero
(520) 235-6329
fquintero@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
09/19/2025 Site Landscape Standard APPROVED
09/19/2025 NPPO Standard NOT REQUIRED
09/17/2025 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Jeffrey W. Cassidy, Planner
Planning & Development Services Department – Current Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: TC-DEV-0825-00211– Commercial – City has no previous records of this site, submittal of DP to provide city record of existing conditions of the site. No work is being proposed, all to be shown as existing
2023 W Price St Tucson, AZ 85705 (I-1 Zoning)
Development Package Review – 1st Review

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 17, 2025

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 14, 2026.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

1. COMMENT: Provide missing north arrow on Alta survey sheet 2 of 2.

2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet.

2. COMMENT: Provide missing legend.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

3. COMMENT: Provide missing information for owner and applicant per 2-06.4.1 standard.

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

4. COMMENT: Provide missing legal description per county website: Northwest Tucson Industrial Park Lot 21 & 22 FW 1.314 AC on SP1.0 sheet.

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

5. COMMENT: Reformat the sheets to reflect ‘of 3‘ as there are 3 sheets currently being submitted.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

6. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0825-00211, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

7. COMMENT: Draw and label Section(s), Township and Range on the project location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

8. COMMENT: Provide missing gross square footage and acreage for the overall site.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

9. COMMENT: The existing use is identified as ‘warehouse’ and the proposed use is identified as ‘auto repair garage’. Neither are consistent with the Tucson UDC use definitions. Refer to ARTICLE 11: DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-7039 to determine what specific existing and proposed use(s) are consistent for this project. A permit for TC-COM-0525-00984 was approved 08-27-2025 for paint boot installation which means at least a portion of the proposed use must be coined as Trade Service and Repair – Major to of allowed for this (also consistent with the Zoning Verification Letter dated 04-10-2025 and zoning reviewer comment #2, dated 06-28-2025 and zoning reviewer comment #2, dated 09-11-2025 both for TC-COM-0625-01154).

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

10. COMMENT: Provide missing square footage for storage containers.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

11. COMMENT: Provide missing 50’-0” of context outside each property line.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

12. COMMENT: Label 10-0” Public Utility Easements along N Miller Av and W Price St.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

13. COMMENT: Provide missing recordation data, sidewalks, landscape areas (and associated dimensions) along N Miller Av and W Price St.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

14. COMMENT: Provide missing zoning information on site plan sheet.

2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

15. COMMENT: Provide missing sight visibility triangles.

2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

16. COMMENT: Provide missing fire circulation information per 2-06.4.9.H.3 standard.

2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

17. COMMENT: Provide missing dimensions as requested in the 2-06.4.9.H.4 standard.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

18. COMMENT: Until the proposed use(s) has been clarified, zoning cannot confirm whether or not the stalls provided meets code.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

19. COMMENT: Indicate on plans where the existing Long Term Bicycle Parking requirement is being met.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

20. COMMENT: Provide missing heights of all buildings and structures on-site.

2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

21. COMMENT: Refer to Comment # 13 for missing sidewalk location graphics.

2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

22. COMMENT: Draw and label missing refuse collection areas per 2-06.4.9.T standard.

MISCELLANEOUS:

23. COMMENT: There are extra keynotes in the parking stalls that don’t apply; two #3 and one #5.

24. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other the PDSD reviewer comments.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Corrected development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home .
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/old-pdfs/double-old/resubmittals.pdf
08/19/2025 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
08/25/2025 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED EXTERNAL REVIEWERS
CDRC added. TEP,ADOT SWG USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TEP and ADOT. FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG.
08/29/2025 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Good Afternoon,

ADOT has reviewed this DEV and has no comments.

Thank you for the opportunity to review.
08/25/2025 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED FYI
CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
08/25/2025 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED FYI
CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
08/25/2025 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED FYI
CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
09/16/2025 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
08/20/2025 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
08/22/2025 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
09/09/2025 ROW Engineering Review Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
08/25/2025 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED
09/12/2025 Site Engineering Standard REVIEW COMPLETED