Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0825-00208
Parcel: 10512057E

Address:
26 W ROGER RD

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0825-00208
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/20/2025 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard APPROVED Good morning,

Pima County Addressing approves of TD-DEV-0825-00208.



Thank you,





David Wilging

Planner I - Addressing Division

Pima County Development Services

201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor

Tucson, Arizona 85701

520-724-6381
09/24/2025 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard APPROVED WO#T160475
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: Multi family duplexes
TD-DEV-0825-00208
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted 8/14/2025. There are no existing facilities within the development. There are no apparent conflicts at this time.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department,
LandReviews@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Chuck Leon
(520) 400-6133
cleon@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
09/09/2025 NPPO Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT See site landscape comments for NPPO requirements.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
08/28/2025 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT New driveway should be per PAG SD 206. If curb returns are used, PAG SD 207 Type 4 ramps should be used to connect sidewalks. Crosswalk should also be concrete in pedestrian pathway.
Existing driveway to be closed should include reconstructing sidewalk that exceeds 2% cross slope.
DTM Comment file has been added in attachments.
09/03/2025 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit: TD-DEV-0825-00208
Location: 26 W ROGER RD
Review Date: 9/3/2025
Site Engineering Comments:
1. Due to the proximity of the on-site detention basins to the proposed structures, a soils report will be required. This require can be found in section 14.2.6 of the Drainage Manual. This will contain recommended minimum setbacks from buildings and other structures.
2. Roger RD is classified as a Collector Street, revise sight visibility triangle accordingly. TSM 10-1.5.3
3. Provide the backup spur measurements for the handicap spot on the northwest side as well as the northeast side
4. Revise trash enclosure detail and grading plan to show the ramps slope being 2% away from enclosure as well as the enclosure slab sloping 1% to the gate.
5. Show vertical separation between the PAAL and north pedestrian pathway going west to east. As well as the sidewalk on the northwest portion of the project.
6. Show pedestrian circulation from the ADA parking spaces connecting to the lots on the East.
7. Provide a retention/detention basin maintenance checklist and schedule in the Drainage report.
8. Provide Basin dimensions on grading sheet for proper site inspection
9. The required minimum freeboard shall be 6 inches within basins constructed below natural grade DSSDR 4.4.1
10. Provide more details on the basins, including side slopes, and basin floor details.
11. Basin inlets are required to have erosion protection which extends below the finished grade of the basin floor DSSDR 4.8.1
12. Basin outlets are required to have erosion protection and be placed beneath the finished grade of the downstream side of the outlet DSSDR 4.9.1

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact
Marco Contreras
Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
09/09/2025 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: MULTI FAMILY DUPLEXES FOR 26 WEST ROGER ROAD
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0825-00208
ADDRESS: 26 W ROGER RD
ZONING: R-2 RESIDENCE ZONE

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape and NPPO Section review comments have been addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. The parking lot shade tree planting area is 3.5 feet in width. Adjust to meet the UDC standard of 4 feet.

2. The Mesquite to the east of the parking area next to the sidewalk is really tight to the sidewalk. Adjust its location. Remove either the Mesquite or the Palo Verde in this area as the spacing is inappropriate. With on center spacing at mature tree canopy size, the canopies should not overlap very much, if at all. This is also the case elsewhere on site, adjust as necessary.

3. For reference: Desert Willow mature width is approximately 25 feet, and the plan depicts them at 36 or 37 feet. The oversized symbol helps with your spacing issue, but it would be an improvement to the plans if the canopy size of the Desert Willow is shown at its true 25-foot diameter size.

4. For the parking lot canopy tree show an irrigation line and sleeve under the sidewalk.

5. Are there supposed to be WHIA basins associated with subwatershed 3AA and 3AB? If so, show the WHIA or depressed landscape areas on the plans.

6. For contractor clarity, highlight these notes on the Rainwater Harvesting plan per TSM 4-01.2. DESIGN CONSIDERATION AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS:
Soils within Water Harvesting Infiltration Areas should be modified as needed to counteract the effects of mechanical compaction and/or poor soil infiltration conditions in order to ensure appropriate water infiltration; Water Harvesting Infiltration Areas shall be designed so that water infiltrates into soil within 24 hours; Water Harvesting Infiltration Areas shall be designed to minimize ponding in areas that may create a nuisance for pedestrians. Ponding is not allowed on or over public sidewalks or required pedestrian circulation paths.

7. Additionally, any other sections of TSM 4-01 that clearly outlines the design and construction intent will be a welcomed addition to the commercial rainwater harvesting plan/notes.

8. Add a breakdown table of the total TOS and total Mitigation plants from the NPPO. The numbers are located in your calculation table, but for review purposes and for contractor implementation it is simpler if the breakdown is on both the NPPO and the planting plan. Clearly label all of the PIP and Transplants on the planting plan.

9. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0825-00208, adjacent to the title block on all site landscape sheets, per Administrative Manual 2-06.4.3

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
520.837.4923
09/05/2025 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: 26 W. Roger Rd. - Multifamily
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0825-00208

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 5, 2025

DUE DATE: September 5, 2025

COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 12, 2026.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0825-00208, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The Use Specific Standard listed under General Note 2 is not complete. Review UDC Table 4.8-2 and provide the complete list of Use Specific Standards.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Roger Rd. is designated as an Collector on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – It does not appear that the lot coverage calculation is correct. Clarify what “PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES” means. If this is the sidewalks they are not included in the lot coverage.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Fully dimension the northernmost vehicle use area to include but not limited to, PAAL width, back up spurs, etc.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met for the short-term bicycle parking.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide perimeter yard setback dimensions from all buildings to the applicable property lines.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The South required street perimeter yard setback is not correct. Review UDC 6.4.5.C.2.a and provide the correct required setback.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The East required perimeter yard setback is not correct. Review UDC Table 6.3-3.A and provide the correct required setback.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The West required perimeter yard setback is not correct. Review UDC Table 6.3-3.A and provide the correct required setback.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height and specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks shown on the plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
08/07/2025 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
08/14/2025 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED EXTERNAL REVIEWERS
CDRC added, ADDRESS, TEP and ADOT, SWG USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent to and ADDRESS, TEP and ADOT, FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG.
09/08/2025 Commercial Plumbing Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
08/29/2025 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Good Afternoon,

ADOT has reviewed this DEV and has no comments.

Thank you for the opportunity to review.
08/14/2025 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED FYI
CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
08/14/2025 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED FYI
CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
08/14/2025 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED FYI
CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
09/03/2025 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
08/11/2025 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
08/13/2025 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED The submitted plans do not meet UDC TSM 7-01.4.F. which states "Sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas cannot be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space." Additional comments on this design will provided as part of the first full review.