Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0824-00232
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/27/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | |||
| 09/20/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/16/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Show how existing building #5 will be connected to the public sewer. | ||
| 08/30/2024 | Design Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | SMD Design Package needs to go through the SMD/Historic Preservation review process and approved by the PDSD Director prior to review and approval of Development Package. Please submit a Design Package as a subrecord of this Development Package, following these instructions: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/special_districts_application_instructions_7.18.23.pdf Please let me know if there are any questions: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you. | ||
| 08/30/2024 | Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | SMD Design Package needs to go through the SMD/Historic Preservation review process and approved by the PDSD Director prior to review and approval of Development Package. Please submit a Design Package as a subrecord of this Development Package, following these instructions: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/special_districts_application_instructions_7.18.23.pdf Please let me know if there are any questions: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you. | ||
| 09/20/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: FOOD SERVICE & RETAIL/SALES COMPRISED OF NEW & EXISTING HISTORICAL BUNGALOWS ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0824-00232 ADDRESS: 1647 E BROADWAY BL ZONING: R-2 RESIDENCE ZONE LAND USE: COMMERCIAL This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0824-00232, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. On the NPPO sheet the total mitigation required on site states that 1 Yucca species is required on site, and the native plant mitigation summary states that zero Yucca are required on site. Please clarify. 4. The City of Tucson ROW landscape notes are good. DTM approval is required for all planting and irrigation in the ROW prior to the approval of the development package. Reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) for this project. DTM will provide a letter of consent for your records and for the overall project file. 5. The amenity plantings (Fruit/Citrus trees to be selected by LA) plants are not part of the ADWR plant list. These trees will take special care and maintenance to thrive in the Tucson climate. I think it is great to provide these options for the client, but not applicable for City of Tucson landscape review and approval. Possibly add a note about the sensitivity of these plants and the owners’ responsibilities with the maintenance. I have not looked at compliance plans that indicate the implementation of citrus and fruit trees. Please reach out to discuss if needed. 6. The Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan is incomplete. Finish the CRWHP with all applicable information including flow directions that match the civil grading plan, WHIA SF and depth in the water budget table, reference to civil grading plans for construction of basins and anything else needed to complete this portion of the development package. 7. Please label irrigation meter as “irrigation only” on the irrigation plan. See TSM 4-01.6.0 If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 09/16/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The proposed trash enclosure being serviced from the alley will need a TSMR and approval from ES. 2. In the TSMR for the trash service from the alley include a detail showing the 2-3 cubic yard bins for trash/recycling as ES has recently informed PDSD that using a single enclosure doesn't work for services both trash and recycling. They will need to review and approve this proposal. 3. The rain water harvesting plan doesn't look complete and the water budget table is missing inputs like WHIA area and depths, revise as needed. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 09/20/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please see Site Landscape comments for NPPO requirements. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 09/20/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Fernando Garcia PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 1601-1647 E Broadway Bl, Tucson, AZ 85719 Parcel(s): 124-09-124A Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0824-00232 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 20, 2024 DUE DATE: September 15, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 13, 2025. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0824-00232, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Retail/Sales is not a Retail Trade Group description within the Unified Development Code (UDC) or Sunshine Mile District (SMD) Overlay. Substitute with “General Merchandise Sales”. As a courtesy note, if it is possible that a future tenant may function as “Food and Beverage Sales” (for example, a bakery or butcher), as a principal rather than accessory use, indicate this use as well. This use would not be covered under “General Merchandise Sales”. If additional uses are utilized, ensure the “Building Information Table” on Sheet 3 reflects changes. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Once SMD application is submitted and approved, provide SMD application number in lower right corner. Per III.M. of the SMD, all SMD-eligible projects must include at least ten or more environmentally conscious design practices as listed in the SMD overlay ordinance. Annotate these practices within the general notes of the development package once approved. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – General Note 5 indicates existing interior GFA area only. Indicate new interior GFA, as well as existing and new patio dining area percentages and areas. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Indicate percentage of expansion from existing based upon revised calculations and indicated in preceding comment (2-06.4.7.A.8.b). 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - Off-site parking is permitted for the proposal as the associated parking lot is on an adjacent street and is located within 300 feet of the project site, subject to approval by DTM. A shared parking agreement with the City or a third-party will be required. Provide documentation. Approval of this development package will be contingent upon completion of the associated off-site parking lot. Per UDC Table 7.4.4-1, and based upon the Building Information Table on Sheet 3, the minimum number of motor vehicle parking spaces required is 143. The minimum number of accessible parking spaces is 7. The minimum number of van accessible spaces is 1. Under the SMD Overlay, the required number of vehicle parking spaces may be reduced based upon approved qualifying conditions indicated in SMD Table III.H.2. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Bicycle parking locations and details are missing from plans. Per UDC Section 7.4.9., short and long-term bicycle parking locations must be sited within specific distances of entrances and may require lighting requirements. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1, based upon the Building Information Table on Sheet 3, the minimum required short-term bicycle parking spaces is 7 and the minimum required long-term bicycle spaces is 6. Under the SMD Overlay, the minimum required short-term bicycle parking spaces is 2 and the minimum required long-term bicycle parking spaces is 0. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Building height is measured from design grade. Ensure provided building heights are correctly annotated as to meet height restrictions. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - No pedestrian circulation is shown from the seven individual bungalow entrances to E Broadway Bl or the rest of the site. If any of these are to function as entrances, pedestrian circulation should be demonstrated. Clarify intent in comment response letter. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Fernando Garcia at fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4989. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, requested additional documentation, and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal are available at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 08/15/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/26/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Design Review, ADOT, Addressing and TEP PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TAA, Addressing and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 08/26/2024 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good Afternoon, ADOT has no comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review. |
||
| 08/26/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 09/17/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0824-00232. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager II – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 08/26/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 09/20/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | September 20, 2024 WO#T126432 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: TD-DEV-0824-00232 DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE for TUCSON GASTRONOMY COLLECTIVE TD-DEV-0824-00232 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 8/26/2024. There are existing facilities which not depicted upon the plan; however, there do not appear to be any apparent conflicts with the Pole line in the alley. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Martin Salazar (520) 305-6713 msalazar@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 08/26/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 09/13/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | Verify pavement moratorium on Broadway will not affect the installation of the new hydrant. | ||
| 08/22/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/23/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |