Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0824-00228
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/31/2025 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/16/2025 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide the size of the water meters that will serve the new duplexes and the water demand that each will serve. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Specify the materials to construct the building sewers, water service, underground gas piping, and buried electrical services. 3. Provide a detail showing how the water service, building sewers, underground gas piping, and buried electrical service lines will be separated to prevent corrosion, cross-contamination, and to facilitate maintenance activities. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018 and Section 603.2, IPC 2018. 4. Revise the site drawing to include the location, invert and rim elevations of the upstream and downstream manholes, along with the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) reference number. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018 as amended by the City of Tucson. 5. Provide the first floor elevations of the proposed buildings. Determine the need for backwater valves per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. |
||
| 01/31/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Pima County Public Works 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ 85701 If you have any questions please call 520- 724-6490 for an appointment to discuss this notice. If following discussions with staff you still disagree with the below listed deficiencies, you may appeal to the Building Official in accordance with Pima County Code 15.04.060 by submitting the form posted on our web site with payment of appeal fee prior to permit application expiration. Disputes about the interpretation of the Zoning Code may be appealed to a Pima County Board of Adjustment under A.R.S. § 11 -816 and P.C.C. § 18.93.060. Please submit all plans, calculations and specifications to us electronically via the Digital Projects page in the online portal. Comment ID Comment Date Corrections Needed Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments 7 01/30/252025 Yes 2 Nicholas Jordan : DSD Addressing Unit 7 8 01/30/252025 Yes 2 Nicholas Jordan : DSD Addressing Unit 8 9 01/30/252025 Yes 2 Nicholas Jordan : DSD Addressing Unit 9 10 01/30/252025 Yes 2 Nicholas Jordan : DSD Addressing Unit 10 11 01/30/252025 Yes 2 Nicholas Jordan : DSD Addressing Unit 11 12 01/30/252025 Yes 2 Nicholas Jordan : DSD Addressing Unit 12 13 01/30/252025 Yes 2 Nicholas Jordan : DSD Addressing Unit 13 Re-Submittal Procedures Please submit all documents using Citizen Access at permits.pima.gov (i.e. plans, drawings, calculations, quantities, exhibits, photographs, letters, etc.). 1. Please go to permits.pima.gov and login to your account to access review comments and resubmit. 2. If you have questions or need clarification regarding comments, please contact the reviewer. 3. Provide a response to each correction comment. 4. To resubmit, upload revised full plan set. Should the resubmittal not completely address this request for corrections, the application maybe denied requiring a new application and payment all applicable review fees in accordance withA.R.S. § 11-1605. |
||
| 01/21/2025 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Provide hydrant location with measurement on plan set. Hydrant(s) to be spaced in accordance with IFC 2024, 507.5.1. Provide turn around for dead end in excess of 150', See IFC 2024, 503.1.1/D103.4 Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/24/2025 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Site Landscape Comments for NPPO Requirements. Thank you, Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/03/2025 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0824-00228 • 5740 S NOGALES HY 1. Provide complete details of the existing driveway entrance, (composition, width and if header returns exist). The driveway will have to be paved with header returns. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 01/21/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide a revised waste enclosure wall detail that meets the requirements of PAG Detail 109. 2. Provide dimensions for the clear space within the waste enclosure on the detail. TSM 8 requires 10'-4" x 24'-8" clear space for double enclosures. Please also show the slope of the slab and apron and ensure the minimum 1% and 2% are met, respectively, per TSM 8. 3. Pedestrian circulation is required to connect all buildings, dumpster areas, and the sidewalk on the street frontage per TSM 7-01.3.3. Show a continuous pedestrian path. 4. Please add "by separate permit" to the utilities plan. 5. The porch on the existing building towards the center of the site appears to impede access to/from the proposed parking space directly to the south, and possibly complicate waste collection vehicle maneuverability. Please show vehicle maneuverability for these two areas of concern. Consider relocating or removing the porch. 6. In the drainage report, please provide a map showing the 100-year floodplain boundary for the flows coming from the existing box culvert. Per Tucson Code 26-2 the definition of a regulatory floodplain includes areas where the Q100 is equal to or greater than one hundred (100) cubic feet per second for the one (1) percent flood event. If the floodplain extends onto the property, a floodplain use permit will be required. Scour protection around the northeast corner of the property may be required. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/24/2025 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE FOR ADDING 4 DUPLEX BUILDINGS TO EXISTING SITE ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0824-00228 ADDRESS: 5740 S NOGALES HY ZONING: R-2 RESIDENCE ZONE LAND USE: MULTIFAMILY This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Upon review of aerial images of the site, it appears that protected native vegetation may be present on the site. Please provide an NPPO that shows preservation, transplant and mitigation for the protected plants that will be disturbed/destroyed. If there are no viable native plants, or if there are native plants, but they won’t be disturbed, then please provide an NPPO Waiver for the project. 2. Provide the required shade trees in the parking area planting islands and show the tree quantity calculation on the landscape plan. 1 tree per 4 parking spaces is the requirement. 3. Instead of COT/County recommended plant list, use the Arizona Department of Water Resources Drought Tolerant Plant List (ADWR) as stated in the UDC landscape and screening code. 4. Add quantities to the plant list/legend. Suggestion: Add a general note that states, discrepancies between the planting plan and the planting legend, that the planting plan quantities shall prevail. Or something to this affect. 5. Replace the tree Latin name “Sophora” with “Dermatophyllum” for the Texas Mountain Laurel. 6. General plant comment: Double check all species of plants and make sure that they are on the ADWR Drought Tolerant Plant List. Add a note below the plant list that all of the plant material has been chosen from the ADWR plant list. If a cultivar of one of the species is used in place of a more common variety, it may not be acceptable. 7. Update General Notes (Landscape) number 6 to reflect all disturbed areas and all landscape areas to receive the 2-inch depth mulch. Identify the exact size of rock mulch with the description that it must be washed, screened rock. 8. On all plans, make all background layers 50% transparent, or medium gray so that the information that is pertinent to the plan is easier to read. IE: All hardscape outlines, hatches, building outlines, utility lines, etc. should be a shade of gray as to not conflict with notes, irrigation lines/equipment, planting symbols, and any other information that needs to be legible for the contractor to read the plans during construction. 9. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan is required. The set of plans does not include this plan and required plant water use spreadsheet. Provide the spreadsheet and indicate on the plans the Water Harvest Infiltration Areas (WHIA’s) and Subwatershed areas. Depict contours, flow lines and spot elevation in the depressed planting rainwater harvesting areas on the rainwater harvesting plan and the planting plan that match the civil grading layout and information. An outline of the WHIA with a hatch and spot elevations that match the civil grading plan on its own sheet is an effective way to depict the depressed basin areas. Clearly call out the depressed landscape areas with leader callouts and or keynotes and add a schematic detail that shows basin side slopes, depth of rock, depth of basin and plant placement within the basin. If an example of this type of detail is needed for the plans, then please reach out and I will supply a copy. 10. As a standard practice, a few spot elevations on the CRWHP at the bottom of basin and basin curb cut inlets and outlets that match the civil grading plan for coordination between the plans should be included on the CRWHP. Just a few spot elevations in key locations as a quick reference for the contractor and inspectors. 11. On the rainwater harvesting plan add these general notes for construction clarity. Wording similar to the following will provide clear direction/coordination and intent for the contractor’s reference: a. See Civil Grading Plan for additional information on basin side slopes, spot elevation, shape, contouring, flow lines, curb cuts, downspouts, splash pads, etc. b. This Rainwater Harvesting Plan is designed to work in conjunction with the civil grading and drainage plans. The specific intent of the Rainwater Harvesting Plan is to demonstrate that the site grading and drainage facilitates direct flow of impervious-surface runoff in sufficient quantities to the depressed planting areas to comply with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance. It is the Contractor's responsibility to meet the requirements of Site Grading and Drainage plans and the Rainwater Harvesting Plan and to notify the engineer of any discrepancies between the two plans. 12. We have seen some instances where the narrow tree planting areas adjacent to parking stalls have become a hazard for health and safety. Can a call out be added to those specific planters where people are getting out of their cars to be 4-to-6-inch depth, or a maximum of 6-inch depth and coordinate this information on the civil grading plan. 13. Separate lateral lines are required for trees and shrubs. Provide the two separate lines on sheet I-1 and update the irrigation legend with this linework and information. 14. The irrigation schematic plan details are helpful, but irrigation details are also required per UDC Administration Manual 2-10.4.2.C and Technical Standards Manual Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards. Irrigation details can be found on the CoT website here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects. For your reference/use in completing your landscape development package. Example details: - Automatic Controller: wall mount, or pedestal mount - Backflow Preventer - Irrigation pipe sleeving - Irrigation trenching - Drip control valve assembly - Multi-outlet emitter - Single outlet emitter - End flush cap - Rain shut off device ETC. If an example irrigation detail sheet is needed for reference, email me the request and I will send an approved irrigation detail sheet for your reference. 15. The emitter number per plant type belongs on the irrigation plan for consistency and clarity for the contractor. Move the emitter quantities per plant type to the irrigation plan. 16. Multi-trunk trees do not need staking. Update note number 8 in the General Notes (Landscape). Add the following notes to the landscape plan: Tree stakes may be omitted if the tree is able to support itself upright without leaning or bending regardless of caliper size. All trees 2-inch caliper or greater that are standing upright and not bending shall have the tree stakes removed prior to final site landscape inspection. Add a note to remove all nursery stakes. 17. There are two sets of General Notes (Landscape). Change the name of one of the sets of notes or have one set of notes that are numbered 1 through 28. 18. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 19. Label all of the project property lines on all sides, on all sheets with a plan view within the set of plans. 20. Prior to Site Landscape Development Package approval, please make sure Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are addressed. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov or at 520.837.4923 |
||
| 01/20/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Multfamily – 5740 S. Nogales Hwy. Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0824-00228 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 20, 2025 DUE DATE: January 21, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 30, 2025. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.9 – The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) shown on sheets 1 – 3 is not correct. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 – The use, “RESIDENTIAL USE: DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT” is not correct and should be listed as Multifamily, subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10, UDC Table 4.8-2. For dimensional Standard, Multifamily is not a residential use but considered nonresidential, see UCD Article 6.3.3.C. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - The use, “RESIDENTIAL USE: DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT” is not correct and should be listed as Multifamily, subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10, UDC Table 4.8-2. For dimensional Standard, Multifamily is not a residential use but considered nonresidential, see UCD Article 6.3.3.C. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Sheet 2, Keynote 1 lists the use as “PROPOSED CONDOMINIUMS”. If you are proposing condos a final plat will be required. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 – As a general note provide the total number of dwellings units on site. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – The standards listed under Site/Zoning/Land Use Note 19 for the MS&R requirements is not correct. Revise the note to read “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – The floor areas for the existing and proposed building listed under “DEVELOPMENT LOT COVERAGE” and under the “WASTE STREAM CALCULATION” do not match, clarify the difference. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – The “TOTAL” square footage “31,886” is not correct. 5,389+6,565+9,464+9,468 = 30,886 not 31,932 S.F. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building and vehicle use area expansion calculation on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4 are met for the PAAL directly west of the porch on the single family residence. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a PAAL width dimension for the PAAL located between the porch of the single family residence to the vehicle parking space to the west. Minimum width is 24’. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall clearly show how may van accessible spaces are required and provided. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Details 1 & 2 sheet S2, the wheel stop location dimension is not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 and provide the correct dimension. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Details 5 sheet S2, the sign mounting height dimension is not correct and should be 7’-0” to the bottom of the van accessible sign. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.11 & 7.4.12 are met. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.d A single rack is designed and located to accommodate two bicycles. That said clearly show all 4 – 2’ x 6’ spaces on detail 8 sheet S2, UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.f and Figure 7.4.9-C. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met for the short-term bicycle parking . 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The “FRONT YARD SETBACK” “20’-0” listed under Site/Zoning/Land Use Note 15 is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.a and provide the correct required street perimeter yard setback. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The “REAR YARD SETBACK (SOUTH)” “6’-0” OR ¾ HT” listed under Site/Zoning/Land Use Note 15 is not correct. Review UDC Table 6.3-2.A Nonres Use to Res or Nonres Zone and provide the correct required perimeter yard setback. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The “SIDE YARD SETBACK PER” “6’-0” 2/3 HT” listed under Site/Zoning/Land Use Note 15 is not correct. Review UDC Table 6.3-2.A Nonres Use to Res or Nonres Zone and provide the correct required perimeter yard setback. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Key Note 2 sheet S1 & Key Note 1 sheet S3 is not correct. Review UDC Table 6.3-2.A Nonres Use to Res or Nonres Zone and provide the correct required perimeter yard setback. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height and the specific use proposed within the footprint of all building(s) on site. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Review TSM Section 4-01.4.1.B and provide the required sidewalk along the north and west side of the existing single family residence. This sidewalk shall meet the requirements of TSM Sections 7-01.4.2 & 4.3. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Sections 7-01.4.2 & 4.3 are met for “Covered Walk shown along the west side of the existing duplex located in the northeast corner of the site. Additional Comments 26. COMMENT: - Site/Zoning/Land Use Note 4 the “5,000 S.F. MINIMUM” lot size does not apply as this is not a single family residence. Minimum lot size is based on 15 units per acre or 2,904 S.F. per dwelling unit. Based on 13 dwelling units the minimum lot size is37,752 S.F, 0.87 acres If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 12/31/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Addressing and TEP, TAA, PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. CDRC added TEP, Addressing and TAA as an External Reviewer Contact. CDRC will remove contact once we receive their review. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 12/31/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/31/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/22/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | REVIEW COMPLETED | January 21, 2025 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0824-00228, Development Package for adding 4 duplex buildings to existing site, Received December 31, 2024 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0824-00228, the development plan for several new duplex buildings at an existing residential site. This development is located in the N.E. quarter of the N.E. quarter of Section 12, Township 15S, Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel numbers 138-10-0090, covers approximately 1.2 ± acres, and is zoned as Residence 2 Zone (R-2). The nearest major roadway intersection is East Drexel Road and South Nogales Highway, approximately 425 feet to the northeast of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority approves the 1st submittal of this project and is not requiring a resubmittal of this project. Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following notes into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 1 mile north of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. The proposed notes would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement and providing the Airport Disclosure Statement to the new residents of all residential uses. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson – Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4). 1."That prior to the City's approval of the proposed development, the property owner must record the Avigation Easement that discloses the existence and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner must complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder’s Office. Then send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Manager of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Blvd, Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756” 2. Applicable to residential uses only “The property owner/developer/applicant must provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with all new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit must be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The property owner (for itself or its tenants) shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority within ten (10) days of signature, using the Scott Robidoux mailing address provided above. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning cc file |
||
| 01/22/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | January 22, 2025 WO#T139132 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Site Development Plan New Duplexes TD-DEV-0824-00228 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 1/10/2025. There are existing facilities within the development which are depicted upon the plan. There are existing overhead poles and underground lines that are in conflict. Electrical distribution to existing and new buildings will need to be moved and rerouted at developer’s expense prior to construction. Further, New equipment installs will require TEP easements per SR-108 Standards. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Fred Quintero (520) 235-6329 fquintero@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 12/31/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/26/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/31/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |