Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0823-00370
Parcel: 141185720

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0823-00370
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/28/2023 ROW Engineering Review APPROVED
10/23/2023 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
10/02/2023 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Clarify the size of the building sewer connecting to private MH #2. One note points to the building sewer and calls for “44.24 LF 8” PVC “ but an adjacent note refers to a 4” sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.
2. The maximum distance between manholes shall be 400-feet of developed pipe length measured from the manhole opening to the next manhole or the end of the sewer. Reference: Section 708.1.2, IPC 2018.
09/22/2023 Fire New Construction REQUIRES RESUBMIT Remove vertical obstructions from aerial access.
Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov / 520.837.7082
10/23/2023 Floodplain Administration Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. TS Sec.4-04.1.5.1 & 2.3.1.4.C.7: For proposed spillway into Rita Ranch South Channel, provide surveyable limits for, and label as, Private Drainage Easement for construction and maintenance.
2. TS Sec.4-04.10.11.4: Regarding Rita Ranch South Channel:
i. In drainage report, explain conveyance capacity and time of concentration for outlet flows from development into the South Channel.
ii. On detail or a planview:
a. Add Q100 for outlet flows into South Channel.
b. Add Depth of flow and velocity for proposed regulatory conditions at outlet into South Channel.
iii. On sheet 20, detail W, provide dowling for connection between new outlet infrastructure and existing channel top of bank concrete infrastructure.
iv. On sheets 19 or 20 for details V or W, include additional cross section details for spillway, including showing location and vertical clearance dimension for existing sewer line or other utilities.
3. TS Sec.4-04.2.3.1.5: Clarify the following details:
a. In legend and planviews clarify hatching and entity used in legend matches planviews for gabion baskets and other features shown on planviews and details, including offsite spillway.
b. For detail X/19, the detail does not appear to match the planview conditions; additional clarity or cross sections needed. Riprap show to extend to 5-ft wide berm on planview yet is shorter on detail showing 5-ft wide berm.
4. TS Sec.4-04.2.3.1.5.G: Provide documentation for City permit archive, stating authorization is provided for offsite drainage improvements along east boundary.
For more information please contact COT Floodplain/Stormwater @ Stormwater Stormwater@tucsonaz.gov - Elizabeth L.
09/01/2023 NPPO REQUIRES RESUBMIT See Landscape Comments.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988
09/22/2023 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview
The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
TD-DEV-0823-00370
1. From recent clarification from Environmental Services per TSM section 8, although recycling service isn’t required the site needs to provide at minimum the enclosure space for both solid waste and recycling.
2. Provide a reference for each basin with their corresponding basin plan names: Basin 2 -> TE-BAS-0923-00198, Basin 1 -> TE-BAS-0923-00199.
3. Show the location of roof downspouts. Stormwater from roof drains may not pass over ADA sidewalks per TSM 7-01.4.3D.
4. Provide the distance between the masonry wall and the bollards in the detail for the dumpster enclosure.

Lianne Evans
lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov
09/01/2023 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0823-00370
PROJECT: MICROSTAR BTS
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 8655 S DISTRIBUTION WY/141-18-5720
ZONING: I-1

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.
Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

COMMENTS:
1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments, and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval.
2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0823-00370, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3
3. Identify the site monitor on the NPPO plan.
4. Add irrigation maintenance notes on the irrigation plan ‘Notes’ sheet.
5. Ensure the Grading Plan matches the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan & the Landscape Plan.
6. Show all downspouts/splash pads on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988
09/26/2023 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Microstar BTS
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0823-00370

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 26, 2023

DUE DATE: September 30, 2023

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 30, 2024.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0823-00370, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Under Development Plan General Note 3 the proposed use references “GENERAL MANUFACTURING” but under the vehicle and loading calculation you reference “OFFICE & GENERAL MANUFACTURING” and under the bicycle calculation you reference “OFFICE & WAREHOUSE”, clarify what the proposed use is.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The Use Specific Standards listed under Development Plan General Note 3 for the proposed use are not correct. Review UDC Table 4.8-5 and provide the correct standards.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As this site does not boarder on a street designated on the COT MS&R Map remove the reference to “SECTION 5.4 – MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE” from Development Plan General Note 4.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E - It appears that some type of land split is proposed. This process must be approved prior to approval of this DP.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.G – Provide a FAR calculation for both phases.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.G – The Phase 2 vehicle, bicycle & loading calculation shall include the entire site requirements for both required and provided.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly indicate how vehicles will be prevented from accessing Phase 2 until such time that Phase 2 is constructed.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The parking ratio used for General Manufacturing 1/5,000 SF is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.4-1 and provide the correct ratio.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Demonstrate compliance with UDC Article 7.4.11 & 7.4.12 for the proposed office use.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – The loading space calculation for General Manufacturing is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.5.5-A and provide a correct calculation. Direct Access is not applicable for General Manufacturing.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short & long term bicycle parking calculations reference “OFFICE & WAREHOUSE” but the vehicle parking calculation references “OFFICE & GENERAL MANUFACTURING” and the proposed use under Development Plan General Note 3 references “GENERAL MANUFACTURING”, clarify what the proposed use is, see comment 2, and provide correct calculation that address the correct proposed use(s).

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short term bicycle parking required number for an Office use is not correct and should be a minimum of 2 spaces.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The perimeter yard setbacks listed for the north are not correct. Based on the proposed land split the zoning to the north of this site is I-1.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The required perimeter yard setback to the west is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b and provide the correct required setback.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Keynote 15 calls out a monument sign but Zoning was not able to find keynote 15 on the plan, clarify where the sign is located.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter.
08/24/2023 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
08/29/2023 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED No external reviewers, nor added.
08/24/2023 OK to Submit - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
08/24/2023 OK to Submit - Landscape REVIEW COMPLETED
08/24/2023 OK to Submit - Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED