Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0823-00364
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/21/2023 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 11/17/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 11/21/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/15/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The MEP plans described in the response letter was not included in the latest submittal. Include the location of the backwater valve on sheet C400. [Initial comment: The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (8144-09, 2516.47’) is higher than the first floor elevation (2515.85). Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.] | ||
| 11/07/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0823-00364 (3805 E BROADWAY BL TUCSON, AZ 85716) 2nd Review Some comments from the first submittal were not entirely satisfied. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. You need only respond to unsatisfied comments. 1. SDG 3-14 Where sidewalks cross driveways, the sidewalk should be dominant, maintaining the level, slope, and material of the sidewalk. Please email me if you would like examples. a. Noted. i. Please explain how you have satisfied this requirement. If using an apron, show the apron on the Site Plan and call out P. A. G. SD 206. Alternately, if using curb returns, you can show point elevations on the sidewalk adjacent to the driveway and along the sidewalk where it will be crossed by the driveway. Please also, if using curb returns, note that concrete is used in place of asphalt for the sidewalk that is crossed by the driveway. Sidewalks that are crossed by driveways should be at least 4’ think. (P. A. G. SD 206) 2. Driveways could be built with driveway aprons per P.A.G. SD 206 including an extended apron for Broadway if needed. a. Noted. 3. TSM 10-01.4.1 Sidewalks must comply with the P.A.G. SD 207 requires a detectable warning surface embedded in access ramps. Please ensure the ramp at corner of Camino Del Norte and Broadway up to code. a. Sidewalks at corner of Camino Del Norte and Broadway have been revised up to code. i. This comment was not adequately addressed. The ramp at the corner of Camino Del Norte and Broadway is not shown as being reconstructed (with a bold outline) on the site plan (page 5). Please include this ramp in site plan including a callout referencing P. A. G. SD 207. 4. TSM 10-01.3.2 – Any existing curb, sidewalk, curb access ramps which are not compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards. Please ensure that all broken curbs are repaired. a. Existing curbs, sidewalks, and ramps are compliant with current standards and in good condition. 5. TSM 10-01.5.1, AM 2-06.4.9 – Please provide future and existing sight visibility triangles. Reference TSM 10-01.5.1 for instructions. i. Satisfied. a. Existing SVT on the Site Plan – Future SVT on the Future Modified Site Plan Exhibit. i. Satisfied. 6. AM 2-06.4.9.H4 Please fully dimension offsets between right of way limits, sidewalks, curbs, and other improvements. a. Right of way limits, sidewalks, curbs, and other improvements have been fully dimensioned. i. Satisfied. 7. P.A.G.SD 207, ICC 117.1 Sec 405.7 – Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60”X60” ADA landing is required with a maximum 2% cross slope. Please identify this landing with dimensions and specifications with a callout. Ensure the onsite sidewalk tie in to the ROW sidewalk in the ROW. a. A 60”x60” ADA landing has been provided where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage. i. Satisfied. 8. Please call out P.A.G. SD 207 in reference to all proposed curb ramps in the ROW on the site plan. a. Reference P.A.G. SD 207 has been added on the site plan. i. Satisfied. 9. Please call out P.A.G. SD 211 for tying new curb to existing, 203 for tying new sidewalk to existing, 209 for new concrete curb in the ROW, 200 for new concrete sidewalk in the ROW. a. These call outs have been added on the site plan. 10. Page 11/19, Concrete Sidewalk detail refers to D.O.T. specifications, please reference P.A.G.SD 200 instead. a. The Concrete Sidewalk Detail has been updated. 11. MS&R Plan Policy 2.A.5 & COT 26-10- Required vehicle, drainage, and landscape features cannot be located in the future right-of-way. The drive-thru appears to be in the Future ROW. a. The Plans have been revised. i. This comment has not been satisfied. The site plan still shows a drive thru vehicle access lane in the future ROW. If you would like to use an MS&R covenant, email me for a copy of the document (faffs.riederer@tucsonaz.gov), have the property owner sign and include it in your next submittal as a supplemental document. Please include the future site plan, included in this submittal as a supplemental document, in the development package itself. 12. Accessibility note 3 on page 2 indicates that on site pedestrian path should be 5’ wide. Ped path connected to sidewalk in ROW on Broadway is labeled 4’ on site plan. a. The Ped path connected to sidewalk in ROW on Broadway has been revised to 5’ on the Site Plan. i. Satisfied. Faffs Riederer - Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov Abbreviations: City of Tucson Code (COTC), Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM), Technical Standards Manual (TSM), Street Design Guide (SDG), Pima Association of Governments Standard Details (P. A. G. SD), Access Management Guidelines (AMG), Major Streets and Routes Plan (MS&R). |
||
| 11/03/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Iman Monshizadeh PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Salad and Go / 3805 E Broadway Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-0823-00364 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 011/03/2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Parking calculation of 1 per 300 sf GFA is acceptable for this use. Please update the use for the site under general notes and update the parking calculation table to reflect this use. “Food and Beverage Sales, excluding large retail establishment, subject to use specific standard 4.9.13.O UDC” 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – Add the Future ROW site plan to the development package on the next submittal so it can be stamped alongside the rest of the plans. If it is added as a new page please ensure the page numbers and sheet index are updated to reflect the addition. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Iman Monshizadeh iman.monshizadeh@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 10/23/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |