Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0823-00357
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 11/20/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/20/2023 | Floodplain Administration Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See minor comments on plan sheets and drainage report. | ||
| 09/08/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Landscape comments. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 09/28/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0823-00357 (9595 E VALENCIA RD TUCSON, AZ 85747) Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. Comments: 1. A Private Improvement Agreement (PIA) is required for this project. For details about PIAs, visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Private-Improvement-Agreement Email PIASubmittals@tucsonaz.gov or call Jesus Villezcas at 520-791-5100 to begin the process. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/07/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. North basin appears to intercept runoff from a watershed less than 10 acres (D4). per Detention/retention manual 4.5.1.1 this storage time must be less than 12 hours. 2. Provide detail of apparent pathway through common area channels. 3. Provide a detail and specification of filter fabric installation per Ret/Det manual 4.3.1 4. Provide proposed side slopes of proposed basins. 5. Provide approval of Rancho Antigua to utilize drainage channel. 6. Provide explanation of watershed area - existing 28.7 matches subdivision size per general note 4. Developed watershed area totals 39.1 acres. 7. Provide a typical lot detail with drainage arrows. This Tentative Plat is not sufficient for construction of any site improvements. Grading Plan required with applicable drainage report. Location of Street "A" to Paseo Gran Escalera does not match prior PIA. Please resubmit PIA to reflect accurate locations. Joshua Garcia joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 09/08/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-070823-00357 PROJECT: TENATIVE PLAT – LANDSCAPE/NPPO ADDRESS/PARCEL: 9595 E VALENCIA RD/141-01-0130 ZONING: PAD-38 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1. Include the development package number on the plan set. 2. Identify the site monitor in the NPPO Notes. 3. The landscape plans don’t mention the required two (2) Yucca elata’s from the NPPO that are required, but based on the number of Yucca rupicola and Yucca baccata being used in the landscape plans, Landscape/NPPO has no concerns about those two plants. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 09/27/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: La Escalera Phase 2, Lots 220 - 382 Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0823-00357 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 27, 2023 DUE DATE: October 1, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 31, 2024. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – The tentative plat and landscape plans shall be submitted as a single mulit-page pdf. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The Sheet Index shall include all plans submitted including the landscape plans. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.A – As it appears you are using the Flexible Lot Development use allowed under PAD-38 Part 4.A.1.a.5).f, provide a reference to FLD in the title block. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – the page number and total number of pages shall include the tentative plat sheets and landscape sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0823-00357, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - It does not appear that the PAD Section reference, PAD-38, Sec. A.1.a.5.d, listed under General Note 5 is correct. As the PAD is silent on minimum lot size for standard single-family detached, minimum lot size, “provisions of the UDC for R-2 shall apply. That said as a standard single-family detached development the minimum lot size is 5,000 sq. ft. This development needs to be submitted showing the use as an FLD subdivision meeting the requirements of UDC Article 8.7.3. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The setback listed under SIDE YARD SETBACKS, MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUIDLINGS, 5’, is not correct. Per PAD-38 Part 4.A.1.e.ii, the minimum distance between buildings is 6’-0”. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 9. COMMENT: 2-06.5.2.A – Provide a site coverage calculation that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.3 & UDC Article 8.7.3.D.3. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.5.2.B – Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint). 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 11. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.A – Provide a site coverage calculation that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.3 & UDC Article 8.7.3.D.3. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D – Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.E – An architectural variation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC 15. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.F – A privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC if applicable. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property. Additional comments: 17. Provide a copy of the approved Design Review letter with the next submittal, PAD-38 Part 5.A. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 08/25/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/06/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | No external reviewers, nor added. | ||
| 09/22/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/25/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/28/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/01/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |