Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0726-00209
Parcel: 12810081A

Review Status: In Review

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0726-00209
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: In Review
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/26/2026 Site Landscape Standard APPROVED
08/27/2026 Design Review Standard NOT REQUIRED Not in a Special District.
08/26/2026 NPPO Standard NOT REQUIRED
N/A ROW Engineering Review Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
08/06/2026 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0726-00209 (1st Review)
Project: PROJECT CONSISTING OF: (8) WALL BRACKETS & (2) SAILS, PROVIDING APPROX. (1,878) TOTAL SQUARE FEET OF SHADE
Location: 5420 E BROADWAY BL
Review Date: 8/6/2026
Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate & Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer
Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
Related cases:

Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards.
The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files.

Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference:
City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes
Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333
Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf
Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593

Site Engineering Review Comments:
1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0726-00209) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.3]
2. Provide the page number and total number of pages within the Development Package plan set (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on the bottom right corner of each page. [AM 2-06.4.2.D]
3. Revise the cover sheet to include the name, registration number, seal, and contact information for the Structural Engineer of Record, along with the name and address of the geotechnical firm. This information shall be presented with the other project registrant contact information on the cover sheet. [AM 2-06.4.1]
08/27/2026 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey Cassidy – Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: (2) SHADE SAILS, PROVIDING APPROX. (1,878) TOTAL SF
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0726-00209 5420 E BROADWAY BL TUCSON, AZ 85711

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 27, 2026

Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is July 29th, 2027.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

2-06.4 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

4.1.A.1 Name/mailing address/email/phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.A.1 – Per this standard, provide missing information for structural engineer.

4.1.A.4 If the project is located within a PAD zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD, indicating the location of the portion being developed.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.A.4 – Per this standard, provide missing information for PAD-1.

4.1.B A title block on each sheet that includes:

4.1.B.2 Brief legal description;

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.B.2 – Per this standard, provide missing legal descriptions for BOTH parcels (since accessory structure is on both 128-10-081A and 128-10-082B parcels).

4.1.B.5 The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.B.5 – Per this standard, provide missing information on each sheet.

4.1.B.6 The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (DP, subdivision, rezoning, BOA, DDO, PDMR, TSMR, overlay, etc.).

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.B.6 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0726-00209, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4.2 Required zoning and land use notes:

4.2.C. List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C – Per this standard, provide square footage and acreage for BOTH parcels (since accessory structure is on both 128-10-081A and 128-10-082B parcels).

4.2.D. Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. Reference all UDC use-specific standards applicable to the proposed uses.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The proposed use is not consistent with the uses listed in the UDC via https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-7039 . Indicate if this is to be intended as outdoor seating for an existing restaurant, bar and if so, indicate the square footage of outdoor seating.

4.3 Drainage notes are required, as applicable.

4.3.A List the following notes on all plans/plats: “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.”

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3.A – Provide note per 4.3.A standard.

4.7 Existing and Proposed Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the site plan or plat drawing, as relevant to the drawing type, to indicate the existing and proposed conditions on site. In all instances, a distinction shall be made between existing and proposed conditions for clarity. Additional information regarding conditions within 50 ft or across a street may be requested by a reviewer if needed to adequately complete a full review.

4.7.A Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A – Provide note for BOTH parcels affected by the scope per 4.7.A standard.

4.7.B Identify all lots within the project/subdivision with the parcel identification number (if recorded), block or lot number within the subdivision boundary, total square footage, and lot line boundaries with approximate distances and measurements.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.B – Provide this information per 4.7.B standard.

4.7.I All easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) shall be drawn, dimensioned, and labeled on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Indicate if any existing easements are proposed to be abandoned or vacated. Should an existing easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. Obtain review for conflicts and written concurrence from existing easement holder(s). Said written concurrence must be present as a part of the final package for approval or evidence that the easement will be moved resulting in no additional conflicts.

COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.I – The proposed project appears to consider two lots – 128-10-081A and 128-10-082B – as a single site, under single ownership, and as part of a unified development. As such, a lot combination processed through Pima County could be required prior to final approval of this project. A link to the County Application: https://www.asr.pima.gov/Downloads/Forms/ComboRequest.pdf
Miscellaneous:

11. COMMENT:– Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other PDSD reviewer comments.
RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit revised drawings and any corrected plans along with a detailed response letter, stating how all Site Zoning Review comments were addressed.

**Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.

***For additional information on the standards presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov
07/30/2026 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
08/05/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED External Reviewers not required. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
08/25/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
08/24/2026 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
07/30/2026 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
08/04/2026 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
08/18/2026 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED