Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0726-00209
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/16/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 09/21/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey Cassidy – Planner I PDSD Current Zoning Review Section, Commercial PROJECT: (2) SHADE SAILS, PROVIDING APPROX. (1,878) TOTAL SF Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-0726-00209 5420 E BROADWAY BL TUCSON, AZ 85711 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 21, 2026 SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.A.1 – Per this standard, provide missing information for structural engineer. REV 2 FOLLOW UP COMMENT: PREVIOUS COMMENT ADDRESSED. NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.A.4 – Per this standard, provide missing information for PAD-1. REV 2 FOLLOW UP COMMENT: PREVIOUS COMMENT ADDRESSED. NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.B.2 – Per this standard, provide missing legal descriptions for BOTH parcels (since accessory structure is on both 128-10-081A and 128-10-082B parcels). REV 2 FOLLOW UP COMMENT: PREVIOUS COMMENT ADDRESSED. ON SHEET 3, PARCEL 82B NEEDS THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO BE UPDATED TO WILLIAMS CENTRE RESUB BLK 11 RECT PTN IN NW COR. PARCEL 82A LABLE IS INCORRECT. UPDATE TO 81A. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.B.5 – Per this standard, provide missing information on each sheet. REV 2 FOLLOW UP COMMENT: PREVIOUS COMMENT WAS PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. SHEETS STATE THERE ARE SEVEN YET EIGHT ARE PROVIDED. THE SHEET INDEX INDICATES SIX. UPDATE ALL ACCORDINGLY. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.B.6 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0726-00209, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. REV 2 FOLLOW UP COMMENT: PREVIOUS COMMENT ADDRESSED. NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C – Per this standard, provide square footage and acreage for BOTH parcels (since accessory structure is on both 128-10-081A and 128-10-082B parcels). REV 2 FOLLOW UP COMMENT: PREVIOUS COMMENT ADDRESSED. NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The proposed use is not consistent with the uses listed in the UDC via https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-7039 . Indicate if this is to be intended as outdoor seating for an existing restaurant, bar and if so, indicate the square footage of outdoor seating. REV 2 FOLLOW UP COMMENT: PREVIOUS COMMENT ADDRESSED. NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3.A – Provide note per 4.3.A standard. REV 2 FOLLOW UP COMMENT: PREVIOUS COMMENT ADDRESSED. NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A – Provide note for BOTH parcels affected by the scope per 4.7.A standard. REV 2 FOLLOW UP COMMENT: PREVIOUS COMMENT WAS PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. RPOVIDE MISSING INFORMATION FOR PROPERTY LINE WHERE THERE IS A 1-BOX KEYNOTE POINTING TO IT ON SHEET S3.1. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.B – Provide this information per 4.7.B standard. REV 2 FOLLOW UP COMMENT: PREVIOUS COMMENT WAS PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. LABEL BOTH PARCELS ON THE AERIAL WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE PARCEL NUMBERS. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.I – The proposed project appears to consider two lots – 128-10-081A and 128-10-082B – as a single site, under single ownership, and as part of a unified development. As such, a lot combination processed through Pima County could be required prior to final approval of this project. A link to the County Application: https://www.asr.pima.gov/Downloads/Forms/ComboRequest.pdf REV 2 FOLLOW UP COMMENT: COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. A LOT COMBINATION IS REQUIRED AS THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS PROPOSED TO SPAN AND CONNECT TO TWO DIFFERENT PARCELS. 12. COMMENT:– Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other PDSD reviewer comments. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit revised drawings and any corrected plans along with a detailed response letter, stating how all Site Zoning Review comments were addressed. **Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. ***For additional information on the standards presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov |