Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0726-00205
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2026 | NPPO Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See site landscape comments for waiver requirements. Thank you. Chad Keller, PLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/05/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0726-00205 (1st Review) Project: Grading plan for 3309 north Tyndall Av – Residential Grading – Navajo Wash AE FP Location: 3309 N TYNDALL AV Review Date: 8/5/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate & Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0726-00205) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.3] 2. Provide the general note, “A floodplain use permit and finished floor elevation certificates are required.” [AM 2-06.4.7.B.2.b] 3. Revise paving and grading note #10 – Revise this note to be consistent with the site information provided on the bottom right-hand side of the plan. 4. The following floodplain information is required to be shown on the development package documents. Revise all applicable sheets accordingly: [AM 2-06.4.9.N & Chapter 26-8.(b).(5)] a. Depict the 100-year flood limits with associated Water Surface Elevations (WSELs) for all flows of 100 cfs or greater. 5. Grading Plan – The Limits of Grading (LOG) are not clearly depicted on the grading plan. The LOG must be shown using a distinct line type to differentiate it from other plan elements and to clearly define the extent of proposed ground disturbance. a. Update the legend on Cover Sheet to include and define the Limits of Grading line type. All line types, symbols, and keynotes depicted on the grading plans shall be represented in the legend. 6. Provide drainage flow direction arrows across the entire site to delineate high points, low points, and positive drainage patterns. Flow arrows shall demonstrate that all stormwater runoff is conveyed away from the proposed structure and directed solely toward the applicable adjacent Right-of-Way (ROW) or approved drainage easement. Drainage shall not be directed toward adjacent private parcels. Verify proposed grades reflect a minimum of 5% gradient away from the structure for a minimum horizontal distance of 10 feet [IRC R401.3] 7. Revise the plans to show the full extent of the new SFRs building pad. a. The constructed pad should at a minimum extend beyond the footprint of the new building as deemed necessary – justification will be required if not further pad extent is shown. [Sec 26 -8.(d).(2)] b. Ensure to make it clear on plan view how the pad will be protected from potential erosion – such as ground cover, landscaping gravel, etc. 8. Provide a dimensioned cross-section detail transecting the proposed building pad, illustrating the full vertical extent of proposed grading, finished pad elevation, and existing natural ground surface elevations. The cross-section shall include sufficient horizontal and vertical scale, with labeled elevation datums referenced to NAVD 88, to clearly demonstrate the relationship between proposed and existing topography. 9. Dimension the footprint of the new SFR on plan view. a. Ensure to denote the height of the new SFR with the SF and FFE information. 10. Dimension the driveway width and full extent on plan view. 11. Clarification Required – Include response within comment response letter – Are there plans or intent for more dwellings or site improvements to be made to this site? It is the utmost importance that final site design be determined to avoid future floodplain conflict and/or further analysis being required 12. Revise the plan to provide a keynote/call-out for the intended driveway construction. The keynote should indicate if the driveway will be concrete with the new apron, or if it will transition into a compacted gravel. 13. Provide spot elevations at sufficient density around the perimeter of the proposed structure to substantiate that the Finished Floor Elevation (FFE) complies with the minimum elevation requirement of one foot above determined base flood elevations. Spot elevations shall be provided at all structure corners, at intermediate perimeter points where grade transitions occur, and at the top of pad. All elevations shall be referenced to NAVD 88 and consistent with the benchmark established on the plan set. |
||
| 08/21/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: GRADING PLAN FOR 3309 NORTH TYNDALL AV ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0726-00205 ADDRESS: 3309 N TYNDALL AV ZONING: RESIDENCE ZONE (R-2) LAND USE: OVERALL UNKNOWN 8.21.2026 THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM). RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. The scope of work on this parcel is not clear. Is the development only the small east portion that includes only the one unit, or is this going to be the entire site and multifamily or is it less than 5 units and middle housing? Include a detailed description of the project type. 2. There are trees/plants in the area of a required street landscape border as if this is a multifamily development proposal. Review the above comment to identify the type of project and provide landscape items as necessary per UDC, TSM and AM. 3. The site appears to be void of native vegetation, but please go ahead and provide a NPPO waiver for our records and yours. 4. Prior to site landscape approval, ensure that Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed. 5. Include the Activity Number TD-DEV-0726-00205 on all sheets in the plan set. Thank you. CHAD KELLER - PLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CITY OF TUCSON - PDSD CHAD.KELLER@TUCSONAZ.GOV 520.837.4923 |
||
| 07/27/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/29/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC Added Addressing and TEP to workflow. FYI notice sent to TEP | ||
| 08/20/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/30/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0726-00205. Thank you, David Wilging Planner I - Addressing Division Pima County Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-724-6381 |
||
| 07/29/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/12/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/28/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/29/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/01/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | DTM review comment- 1) Review Updated City of Tucson Driveway Standards detail PDF attached - Reference Type 8 Standards for Placement where curb does not exist. 2) Note driveway dimensions 3) On plan callout ROW features and show utility connection point with in ROW and Pavement noting pavement cuts and dimensions. 4) Note that all Work within the City of Tucson Right of Way will require separate ROW - Development/Building permits per scope of work performed Refer to City of Tucson Department of Transportation web page for information related to Update Permit fee and review - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Permits-and-Codes-Section/Rate-and-Fee-Changes |
||
| 08/18/2026 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/19/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED |