Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0726-00200
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/28/2026 | NPPO Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 08/27/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 09/09/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Sidewalk should be 5' wide. Dedicate 25' radius corner to ROW. Call out new driveways per COT SD 206 type 7 |
||
| 08/17/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0726-00200 (1st Review) Project: THIS PROJECT INVOLVES A CHANGE OF USE FOR PARCEL #107-09-0380, LOCATED WITHIN THE EXISTING C-2 ZONING DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY INCLUDES AN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE CONSISTING OF ONE BEDROOM AND ONE BATHROOM, THAT WILL BE USED AS OFFICE, ALONG WITH ATTACHED METAL GARAGE BUILDING, THAT WILL BE USED AS COMMERCIAL STORAGE BUILDING. THE ATTACHED GARAGE IS NOT BUILT YET AND WAS REVIEWED FOR BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE ON JULY 1, 2025, AND RECEIVED ZONING APPROVAL UNDER BUILDING PLAN DDO-25-42 ON JULY 27, 2025, FOR USE WITHIN THE C-2 DESIGNATION AT THE LOCATION. Location: 455 W MCIVER PL Review Date: 8/17/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate & Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0726-00200) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.4.3] 2. Provide the page number and total number of pages within the Development Package plan set (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on the bottom right corner of each page. [AM 2-06.4.2.D] a. Ensure this remains consistent across the entire plan set. b. The sheet index will have to be revised to adjust for the sheets provided – There are 12 sheets shown – ensure to remove the cover letter addressed to PDSD from the main plan set in resubmission 3. Remove all revision bubbling/clouding from the provided plan set - revision clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. 4. Applicable Code table on cover sheet – Revise the table provided, the City of Tucson adopted The IBC 2024 with ICC A117.1 2017 edition at the beginning of 2026. Please update the accessibility code referenced accordingly. 5. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.” [AM 2-06.4.7.D] 6. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual.” [AM 2-06.4.7.C.2] 7. Provide the general note: “Any Proposed signs will be approved per separate permit” [AM 2-06.4.7] 8. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.” [AM 2-06.4.7.B.3] 9. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General note: “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.” [AM 2-06.4.7.B.1] 10. The plans do not demonstrate compliance with TSM 8-01.5.1.A, which requires that adequate space be provided for both solid waste and recycling collection services. Revise the plans to clearly show that each proposed enclosure provides designated, separate space for solid waste containers and recycling containers and update the associated waste stream calculations provided. 11. Provide a complete trash enclosure construction details in compliance with TSM 8-01.5.0. Details must address wall materials, wall height, gate type and swing, foundation, and enclosure dimensions. It is strongly encouraged that the figures presented in TSM 8-01.9.0 be used as the minimum basis for the enclosure and dumpster layout details shown on the plans. a. Refer to subsequent comment regarding TSMR 12. As this proposal is a change of use from residential to a commercial site that utilizes APC’s, Environmental services approval will be required to accept that they will have no issues in regard to servicing this commercial property within this method & servicing a modified enclosure design. (APC’s continuation). The contact to reach out to at ES will be Andy Vera at Andy.vera@tucsonaz.gov. Please submit the approval provided for the resubmission of this development package. a. If approval is given, ensure to be aware that this request will be managed as a TSMR which will require the submission of a Technical Standards Modification Request at time of resubmission of this development package. 13. Regarding all keynotes/call-outs provided on plan view. To avoid misinterpretation and mixed up of the information provided – revise the plan set so that all keynotes shown have a variation of in line work. What this may mean is that the keynotes may be revised to be circled so it is made clear the number shown is a keynote reference rather than just a number. 14. The trash enclosure details and grading plan sheets must be revised to correctly show the required drainage slopes at and around all trash enclosure locations per TSM 8-01.0.0. The following slope requirements must be reflected on both the detail sheets and the grading plan for every enclosure on the project: a. The approach ramp and surrounding pavement must slope at a minimum of 2% away from the enclosure to prevent water intrusion and standing water at the enclosure pad. b. The enclosure slab must slope at a minimum of 1% toward the gate to drain away from the enclosure interior. c. These slope requirements must be explicitly labeled and dimensioned on the grading sheets and the enclosure detail for each enclosure location. A generic note referencing compliance is not sufficient — slopes must be graphically shown and confirmed on the plans. 15. Grading plan (Sheet C1.2) denote on plan view the FFE for both structures. 16. Grading Plan (Sheet C1.2) – The Limits of Grading (LOG) are not clearly depicted on the grading plan. The LOG must be shown using a distinct line type to differentiate it from other plan elements and to clearly define the extent of proposed ground disturbance. It is recommended that a heavier or bolder line type be used to clearly see the delineated LOD 17. Provide keynotes and call-outs identifying all new structure downspouts and sidewalk scupper locations on the grading plan & site plan sheets. Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges up to and including a ten-year frequency flood event, and drainage flowing across any pedestrian circulation path shall be conveyed under the path for up to and including the ten-year frequency flood events [TSM 7-01.4.1.E and 7-01.4.3.E]. It will need to be demonstrated that all pedestrian pathways are shown to not be subject to roof drainage discharge. 18. Grading Plan (Sheet C1.2) – revision required – revise the grading plan, to show and delineate the water harvesting areas as proposed and see within the drainage report. 19. The grading plans lack sufficient spot elevation information at key drainage control points necessary to verify design intent and facilitate site inspections during and after construction. Provide spot elevations at all of the following locations: a. All curb cut inlet locations, showing both the top of curb elevation and the adjacent pavement grade at the inlet opening. b. All landscaped water harvesting area inlet and overflow points. c. All curb cut outlet locations, showing outlet invert elevation and the receiving grade immediately downstream. d. Top of curb versus finished pavement grade at key transitions throughout the site to confirm positive drainage and curb reveal are maintained as designed. This will be critical to confirm vertical separation requirements are addressed regarding all pedestrian pathway areas. 20. The site plan does not dimension all existing and proposed curb return radii at internal drive aisles and roadway access points. Provide dimensions for all curb return radii at the following locations: a. Confirm that all curb return radii comply with the dimensional requirements of Chapter 25, Streets and Sidewalks Standards and UDC 7.4.6.E.1.a. Where existing curb returns are to remain, document the existing radii and confirm compliance or identify any required modifications. |
||
| 08/28/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: A CHANGE OF USE AND COMMERCIAL STORAGE BUILDING ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0726-00200 ADDRESS: 455 W MCIVER PL ZONING: COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-2) LAND USE: OFFICE/COMMERCIAL STORAGE 8.28.026 THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM). RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Provide a letter of approval with the resubmittal from DTM and David Marhefka, PLA, for use of 5’ of the ROW for landscape plantings and irrigation. 2. Include SVTs on the planting plan for plant size and placement review. 3. Include WHIA contouring on the civil proposed quality drainage map that matches the scheme shown on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan. The southwest corner of the property is not included on the civil proposed quality drainage map. Additionally, the northwest corner of the north building contouring is not shown. Remember that the offset from building foundation to the top contour of a basin is 10’ minimum without geotechnical testing next to the foundation. Adjust the design so that it is a minor depression that will provide appropriate fall toward the scupper and away from the building. 4. Prior to site landscape approval, ensure that Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed. 5. Include the Activity Number TD-DEV-0726-00200 on all sheets in the plan set. Thank you. CHAD KELLER - PLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CITY OF TUCSON - PDSD CHAD.KELLER@TUCSONAZ.GOV 520.837.4923 |
||
| 08/07/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added ADOT, TEP , PAG, SWG, and USPS to workflow. FYI sent to TEP, PAG, SWG, and USPS. | ||
| 08/21/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/21/2026 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | ADOT has no comments. Thanks, Rick Freije |
||
| 08/07/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/07/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/07/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/07/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/25/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/31/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/04/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |