Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0726-00196
Parcel: 14039043D

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0726-00196
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/19/2026 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard APPROVED Good morning,

Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0726-00196.

Thank you,

David Wilging
Planner I - Addressing Division
Pima County Development Services
201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor
Tucson, Arizona 85701
520-724-6381
09/15/2026 ROW Review NOT REQUIRED
08/20/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0726-00196
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 5030 E VALENCIA RD TUCSON, AZ 85756

Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review.

If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov.

COMMENTS:

1. Cleanouts shall allow the drainage piping to be cleaned only in the direction of flow. Two additional two-way cleanouts are shown on Sheet C4.1, aside from the cleanout at the building junction/building sewer. Please clarify. Reference: Section 708.1.9, IPC 2024.
2. Please show the RIM elevation of the nearest upstream manhole on the plans to determine whether a backwater valve is required. The topographic survey included with the associated building plans (TC-COM-0626-00992) shows the RIM elevation as 2690.36. Please include this information on this DP. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2024, as amended by the City of Tucson.
09/10/2026 External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Good afternoon,



Attached is a copy of TAA’s comment letter on TD-DEV-0726-00196. I have included copies of the TAA Avigation Easement and the Airport Disclosure Statement form since these are referenced within the comment letter.



Thank you,



Scott Robidoux, C.M.

Manager of Planning







TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY
7250 South Tucson Blvd, Suite 300

Tucson, Arizona 85756

Phone 520-573-8100

Direct 520-573-4811
09/11/2026 NPPO Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT See site landscape comments for additional NPPO clarification information.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, PLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
09/16/2026 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0726-00196 (1st Review)
Project: O’Reilly Auto Parts Store
Location: 5030 E VALENCIA RD
Review Date: 9/16/2026
Reviewer: Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer – Site Development
Reviewer Contact Information: joe.macaulay@tucsonaz.gov


Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards.
The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files.

Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference:
City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes
Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333
Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf
Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593

Site Engineering Review Comments:
1. As the development package TD-DEV-0726-00196 has yet to see full approval, please remove all revision bubbles and deltas around changes made as they are not considered after approval revisions.
2. Please add the name, mailing address, email and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents on the plan set cover sheet. [AM 2-06.4.1.A.1]
a. Please move/add this information to the cover sheet C0.0.
3. Please shift the legend and project control information on sheet C0.1 to the cover sheet C0.0. [AM 2-06.4.1.A.1]
4. Provide the general note: “Any Proposed signs will be approved per separate permit” [AM 2-06.4.7]
5. Please add the required Drainage General Note “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.” [AM 2-06.4.3.A]
6. Please add required Drainage General Note “Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.” [AM 2-06.4.3.D]
7. Please add the following required Wastewater Management General Notes:
a. “On-site sanitary sewers, except public sewers within public sewer easements or rights-of-way, will be private and will be constructed, operated, and maintained on a private basis. The location and method of connection to an existing public sanitary sewer is subject to review and approval by the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (RWRD) at the time of submittal of plumbing or building plans.” [AM 2-06.4.5.A]
b. “Any wastewater discharged into the public sanitary sewerage system shall meet the requirements of Pima County RWRD Ordinance No. 1991-140, or as amended.” [AM 2-06.4.5.B]
c. “On-site sanitary sewers will be public and will be designed and constructed to Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Standards and must be accepted and released for service by Pima County prior to the issuance of sewer connection permits.” [AM 2-06.4.5.C.1]
d. “A project Construction Permit must be secured from Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department before beginning any work on this project.” [AM 2-06.4.5.C.2]
8. E Valencia Rd has a current designation as an Arterial Gateway. Sight visibility triangles (SVT) will need to be shown for current and future ROW for all entrances/exits to the site. TSM 10-01.5.0
9. Sidewalks associated with PAALs must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation (minimum six inches), barriers, railings, or other means, except at designated crosswalks. [TSM 7-01.4.2, UDC 7.4.6]
a. Please show compliance with this requirement for the sidewalk at the southeast corner of the building.
10. When bollards or architectural features are used to provide physical separation, the maximum separation between the barriers is five feet clear. Please update spacing of the proposed bollards to reflect this required separation. [TSM 7-01.4.2, UDC 7.4.6]
11. All sidewalks must be a minimum of four feet wide and installed to avoid any obstruction which decreases the minimum width to less than four feet. [TSM 7-01.4.3.A]
a. Please show dimensions of clear space on sidewalk between building and bollards on Sheet C2.1 to reflect compliance with this requirement.
12. Provide hatching legend or keynote for the diagonal hatched location to the south of the southeast sidewalk location on sheet C2.1.
13. Pedestrian circulation is required to connect all buildings, dumpster areas, common areas, and the sidewalk on all the street frontages. [TSM 7-01.3.3]
a. Please provide pedestrian access to trash enclosures.
14. Wheel stop curbing must be a minimum of two and one-half feet from the front of the parking space. [UDC 7.4.6.H.3]
a. Please show dimension at proposed wheel stop locations to demonstrate compliance with this requirement.
15. Please provide wheel stops at the south parking locations to demonstrate that vehicle overhang will not encroach onto the adjacent property to the south.
16. Show PAAL dimension (30.41’) on Sheet C2.1 perpendicular to the parking spaces on the west side of the lot.
17. All sidewalks must have a minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 84 inches. [TSM 7-01.4.3.B]
a. Please update the “Accessible Parking Sign Detail” on Sheet C7.4 to reflect this required vertical clearance to the bottom of the lowest proposed sign panel.
18. Please revise General Note #4 on Sheet C4.1 to say City Of Tucson instead of Polk County.

Waste Collection Comments:
19. The plans do not demonstrate compliance with TSM 8-01.5.1.A, which requires that adequate space be provided for both solid waste and recycling collection services. Revise the plans to clearly show that each proposed enclosure provides designated, separate space for solid waste containers and recycling containers.
20. Provide complete trash enclosure construction details in compliance with TSM 8-01.5.0. Details must address wall materials, wall height, gate type and swing, foundation, and enclosure dimensions. It is strongly encouraged that the figures presented in TSM 8-01.9.0 be used as the minimum basis for the enclosure and dumpster layout details shown on the plans.
21. The trash enclosure details and grading plan sheets must be revised to correctly show the required drainage slopes at and around all trash enclosure locations per TSM 8-01.0.0. The following slope requirements must be reflected on both the detail sheets and the grading plan for every enclosure on the project:
a. The approach ramp and surrounding pavement must slope at a minimum of 2% away from the enclosure to prevent water intrusion and standing water at the enclosure pad.
b. The enclosure slab must slope at a minimum of 1% toward the gate to drain away from the enclosure interior.
c. These slope requirements must be explicitly labeled and dimensioned on the grading sheets and the enclosure detail for each enclosure location. A generic note referencing compliance is not sufficient — slopes must be graphically shown and confirmed on the plans.
22. Waste stream calculations have not been provided. Provide the required waste stream calculations for the entire development. The calculations must be presented in table format and must: [TSM 8-01.8.0]
a. Break down waste generation by use type and unit count (e.g., number of residential units, commercial square footage, etc.) using the generation rates prescribed in TSM 8-01.8.0.
b. Identify the total estimated solid waste and recycling volumes generated by the development on a periodic basis (weekly or per collection cycle).
c. Demonstrate that the number, size, and configuration of the proposed enclosures and dumpster containers are adequate to accommodate the calculated waste volumes between collection intervals.
d. State how solid waste and recyclables will be handled and collected, including the proposed collection frequency.
23. A trash truck maneuverability exhibit has not been provided. Provide a dedicated exhibit or detail demonstrating that a standard solid waste collection vehicle can safely access, maneuver to, and service all proposed trash enclosures on the site in compliance with TSM 8-01.5.3 and TSM 8-01.5.3.F. The exhibit must address the following:
a. The turning radius and approach path of a standard collection vehicle for each enclosure(s) location.
b. Demonstration that the required back-up distance and maneuverability clearances are achievable within the proposed drive aisle and parking layout without conflict.
c. Confirmation that collection vehicles can enter and exit the site in a forward direction, or, if backing is required, that the back-up distance and sight conditions comply with the requirements of TSM 8-01.5.3.F.

SWPPP Comments:
24. Please revise Sheet C1.1 title to Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
25. No labeled concentrated flow points / drainage arrows tied to BMPs - The plan shows no flow arrows around the perimeter. Revise SWPPP plan view accordingly.
26. No material storage/staging area — no area is designated for storage of construction materials, chemicals, or hazardous substances, revise the plan to provided appropriate staging area(s). Ensure that proposed Storage/Staging Area will be sufficient to accommodate the needs for construction activities on this size of project.

Drainage and Grading Comments:
27. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to all proposed basins on the Grading plans. Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. This can be done through an additional detail sheet or included on current basin detail sheet if the grading plans appear too narrow for such details. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box: [DSSDR 11.1.3] - Notice: some information is acknowledged, but ensure this list is referenced and the descriptors updated accordingly.
a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet; 
b. detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet; 
c. retention volume, cubic feet; d. 
d. first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; 
e. Q100 in, cubic feet per second; 
f. Q100 out, cubic feet per second; 
g. Basin top elevation, feet; 
h. 100-year water surface elevation, feet; 
i. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet.
28. Provide side slopes for all proposed basins on the plans (H:V).
29. Provide a keynote/call-out in the grading plans describing the slope treatment proposed for each of the proposed basins. [DSSDR 4.7.1]
30. Show the 2-foot minimum bench grading setback from the property line on the grading plan TSM 2-01.9.0. A reduced setback will require geotechnical justification that no adverse impacts will be caused by the proximity of grading and drainage infrastructure within the minimum 2-foot setback. This will need to be reviewed across all details and grading limits between lot boundaries.
31. Plans show multiple conflicts with the proposed layout and the existing 10-foot communication line easement including the basin on the west of the site and tree/shrub placement within the easement. Please coordinate the proposed layout with the utility company to demonstrate that this will not impact the existing utility.
32. Please provide a cross section perpendicular to the existing communication line at its junction with the proposed basin on the west of the site to show the proposed cover over the utility.
33. Please provide additional grading information on the north and east sides of the building to demonstrate compliance with the geotechnical report section 4.1.2 for landscape area recommendation of 5ft away from building foundation and avoidance of ponding at or near building.
34. Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to and including a ten-year frequency flood event. Drainage flowing across all pedestrian circulation paths shall be designed and constructed to convey flows under the path for up to and including the ten-year frequency flood events, except at street intersections, pedestrian crossings, and PAAL pedestrian crossings. [TSM 7-01.4.1.E & 7-01.4.3.E]
a. Provide keynotes and call-outs identifying all downspouts and sidewalk scupper locations on all related site plans and/or building sheets. This information is required to demonstrate compliance and to ensure coordination with building permit plan review.
b. If downspouts from rooftops are to be discharged at grade-level, ensure that the stormwaters up to and including flow from a 10-year event are directed away from accessible parking stalls.
c. Ensure proper drainage away from building in accordance with geotechnical report section 4.1.2 at downspout locations.
35. Please show proposed basin linework throughout all sheets for clarity of layout in plans.
36. The grading plans lack sufficient spot elevation information at key drainage control points necessary to verify design intent and facilitate site inspections during and after construction. Provide spot elevations at all of the following locations:
a. All curb cut inlet locations, showing both the top of curb elevation and the adjacent pavement grade at the inlet opening.
b. All landscaped water harvesting area inlet and overflow points.
c. All curb cut outlet locations, showing outlet invert elevation and the receiving grade immediately downstream.
d. Top of curb versus finished pavement grade at key transitions throughout the site to confirm positive drainage and curb reveal are maintained as designed.

Drainage Report Comments:
37. Provide an inspection and maintenance protocol including frequency of inspection, a checklist of items to be inspected and recommended maintenance when an inspection identifies a maintenance requirement and shall be prepared by an Arizona registrant. The protocol may be included in the project drainage report or prepared as a separate document. The protocol shall be reviewed and approved by the Floodplain Administrator prior to approval of the tentative plat or development plan. The protocol shall be delivered to the entity responsible for inspection and maintenance. An example of a detention basin inspection and maintenance checklist is provided in Appendix F. DSSDR 4.1.1. [Drainage Manual 2.3.1.6.C]
38. Site engineering will proceed forward in regard to the requested detention waiver.
09/11/2026 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: CONSTRUCT NEW O'REILLY AUTO PARTS STORE
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0726-00196
RELATED ACTIVITY NO: TP-PRE-0426-00077
ADDRESS: 5030 E VALENCIA RD
ZONING: COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-2)
LAND USE: COMMERCIAL
REVIEW NO.: 1
9.11.2026

THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM).

RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. Per UDC TABLE 7.7.5-1 transplanted native trees require a 1:1 mitigation ratio. Include this mitigation ratio within your summary and provide the additional native trees from nursery as part of the landscape planting plan. Note: The planting plan and legend appears to be accounting for the Blue Palo Verde required mitigation with the quantity count from nursery. A simple note on the NPPO and on the planting plan that states this is sufficient to meet the standards explained above.

2. Include a NPPO monitor and contact information within the NPPO notes.

3. An irrigation only meter is required for all commercial projects per the commercial rainwater harvesting ordinance. Please provide a callout or note on the irrigation legend and on the plans that the meter for landscape is for “irrigation only”.

4. Some of the irrigation linework is a bit hard to read on the plan view. Possibly thicken the line weights for mainline, laterals and end caps. Also look at greying the plant material back a couple more shades.

5. On the rainwater harvesting plan, clearly indicate the WHIA (top contour of basin) and the subwatershed areas related to that WHIA and the information depicted in the calculation table. Note: The subwatershed should include the WHIA basin area as part of the total subwatershed area. Make the line types that represent the WHIA and subwatershed extra bold/thicker compared to the other linework and plant material shown on the plan. It is also helpful if the WHIA area includes a cross hatch for simple review.

6. The grading plan looks good overall. Include a few of the spot elevations shown on the grading plan on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan as well. Spot elevations at curb cut inlets, outlets and at the bottom of the basin helps with quick reference between plans. Duplicate the flowline information from the grading plan on the rainwater harvesting plan as well.

7. Include a note on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan that refers to the grading plan for all drainage structure detailing, drainage scheme, etc.

8. Include a cross section of one of the WHIA to show maximum side slope of 3:1, depth of basin from adjacent hardscape flowline of 6-9 inches, depth of screened rock and plant placement within the basin. This is for clarity and quick reference for the contractors and for site inspections.

9. Some trees and shrubs are planted on the side slopes of the basins. Include tree and shrub planting on slope details.

10. Prior to site landscape approval, ensure that Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed.

11. Include the Activity Number TD-DEV-0726-00196 on all sheets in the plan set.

Thank you.

CHAD KELLER - PLA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

CITY OF TUCSON - PDSD
CHAD.KELLER@TUCSONAZ.GOV
520.837.4923
09/09/2026 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey Cassidy – Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Construct new O'Reilly Auto Parts Store
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0726-00196 5030 E VALENCIA RD TUCSON, AZ 85756 C-2 ZONING

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 09, 2026

Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is July 15, 2027.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

1. COMMENT: Include the missing section corners, and the section, township, and range within the project-location map on the C0.0 sheet. (AM 2-06.4.1.A.3).

2. COMMENT: Provide missing Legal Description on each sheets title block: CTRL PTN NE4 NW4 1 AC SEC 14-15-14. (AM 2-06.4.1.B.2).

3. COMMENT: Add general note(s) indicating that this development is subject to the Major Streets and Routes UDC 5.4 and Gateway Corridor Zone (GCZ) per UDC 5.5 (AM 2-06.4.2.F).

4. COMMENT: Based on a 7,007 sf floor plate, 23 vehicular spaces are required. Update this from 24 on the C2.1 sheet. (AM 2-06.4.2.J).

5. COMMENT: Include the required short and long term bicycle parking per UDC Table 7.4.8-1 on the C2.1 sheet. (AM 2-06.4.2.J).

6. COMMENT: Provide this missing note. List the following notes on all plans/plats: “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.” (AM 2-06.4.3.A).

7. COMMENT: Provide this missing note. “Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.” (AM 2-06.4.3.D).

8. COMMENT: Provide this missing note: List the following note on all development package documents: “No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual.” (AM 2-06.4.4.B).

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.D – Provide this missing note. List the following note on all development package documents: “Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.” (AM 2-06.4.4.D).

10. COMMENT: Provide notes on all applicable building setback lines. (2-06.4.7.G)

11. COMMENT: In the footprint of the building on the site plan sheet, provide the height of the proposed building (AM 2-06.4.7.H).

12. COMMENT: Provide sequence number (recording information) of the joint access and maintenance and public utility easements north and east of the proposed building on sheet C2.1 (AM 2-06.4.7.I).

13. COMMENT: Even though this project is on its own parcel, it is recognized as a single site with parcels 14039042A and14039043E due to the shared access and these parcels functioning as a unified site, please submit a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with your next submittal. The Covenant can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/covenant-regarding-development-and-use-of-real-property-udc-with-release.pdf. (AM 2-06.4.7.I).

14. COMMENT: Revise the site plan provided to provide Sight visibility triangles for the site entrance per TSM 10-01 (AM 2-06.4.7.Q.2).

15. COMMENT: Per UDC 7.4.6-C; When wheel stops are provided within parking spaces, the wheel stop must be placed a minimum of 2.5 feet from the front of the parking stall — measured from the front stall line to the back face of the wheel stop. Update design and provide dimensions (AM 2-06.4.7.Q.4).

16. COMMENT: Refer to UDC 7.4.9 for Bicycle Parking Design Critera and provide a detail for the short-term parking. (AM 2-06.4.7.Q.4).

17. COMMENT: Dimension the proposed sidewalk shown in between the new bollards and ADA signage and the proposed building on both the east and south elevations. (AM 2-06.4.7.S). (TSM 7-01.0.0).

18. COMMENT: Demonstrate onsite pedestrian connectivity to the adjacent parcels they are considered part of a unified site. (AM 2-06.4.7.S). (TSM 7-01.0.0).

19. COMMENT: For E Valencia Rd, provide public or private label and recordation type on the C2.1 sheet. (AM 2-06.4.7.V.1).

20. COMMENT: Provide the general note: “Any Proposed signs will be approved per separate permit” [AM 2-06.4.7.AA].

21. COMMENT: The C4.1 sheet, General note 4, lists Polk County (versus Pima). Update accordingly.

22. COMMENT: The C6.1 sheet #9 keynote needs to be relocated to the proposed signage.

23. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other PDSD reviewer comments.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit revised drawings and any corrected plans along with a detailed response letter, stating how all Site Zoning Review comments were addressed.

**Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.

***For additional information on the standards presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov
08/18/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added Addressing, ADOT, TAA, PAG, USPS, SWG, and TEP to the workflow. FYI notice sent to PAG, USPS, SWG, and TEP
09/25/2026 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED rfreije@azdot.gov
on behalf of
ADOT SC Traffic Engineering - ADOT<adotsctrafficengineering@azdot.gov>

It appears that no off-site improvements within ADOT R/W will be necessary as a result of the development. Therefore, I do not believe any documents need to be re-submitted for ADOT to review.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Thanks, Rick Freije
08/18/2026 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
08/18/2026 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
08/18/2026 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
08/18/2026 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
08/25/2026 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
08/14/2026 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
09/09/2026 ROW Engineering Review Standard REVIEW COMPLETED