Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0726-00191
Parcel: 141186460

Review Status: In Review

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0726-00191
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: In Review
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/11/2026 External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation Standard APPROVED CDRC:

Approved

Regarding TD-DEV-0726-00191, the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department has no additional requirements for the Project and no further reviews by TPRD are required.

Parcel: 141186460
Description: Proposed Walmart 181,128 SF supercenter and fuel station

Regards,
Joe Barr
Project Manager
Tucson Parks and Recreation
520-307-2811
09/22/2026 Design Review Standard NOT REQUIRED Property not in a Special District.
N/A Entitlements Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/10/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0726-00191
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 10002 E OLD VAIL RD TUCSON, AZ 85747

Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review.

If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov.

COMMENTS:


1. Please show the manhole labels on Sheet C66.0 as they are shown on the Sewer Profiles. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2024.
2. Sewer Profile #3 on Sheet C67.0 does not seem to match the section of sewer that is labeled on Sheet C66.0. The section appears to correspond to Sewer Profile #4 on Sheet C69.0 instead. Please revise Sheet C66.0 to reference the correct sewer profile.
3. The RIM elevation of Manhole 1 is shown as 2995.96 on Sewer Profile #1, but on the Sewer Plan on Sheet C66.0, it appears the RIM elevation of that same manhole is 3000.97, with different invert elevations as well. Similarly, the RIM elevation of Manhole 7 is shown as 2995.86 on Sewer Profile #1, but on the Sewer Plan on Sheet C66.0, it appears the RIM elevation of that same manhole is 3000.86.
4. Please clarify what is occurring after the building junction. The invert elevation at the sewer manhole is shown to be higher than the invert elevation at the building junction (S1). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2024.
5. Please verify that the RIM elevations shown for the “POC to the building” for both the Fuel Station and the Main Walmart Building on the Sewer Profile details are correct and align with the FFE elevations shown for both structures.
6. A private sewer collection system that includes manholes, force mains, or lift stations, will require a review of the system design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality prior to obtaining a building permit from the City of Tucson. In addition, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality requires the Engineer of Record to conduct specific inspections during construction. Submit the plans that have been approved by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality for approval. Reference Title 18, R18-9-E302, 4.02 General Permit, Arizona Administrative Code.
08/18/2026 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
08/25/2026 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Pima County Public Works
201 N. Stone Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85701
If you have any questions please call 520- 724-6490 for an appointment to discuss this notice. If following discussions with staff you still disagree with the below listed deficiencies,
you may appeal to the Building Official in accordance with Pima County Code 15.04.060 by submitting the form posted on our web site with payment of appeal fee prior to permit
application expiration. Disputes about the interpretation of the Zoning Code may be appealed to a Pima County Board of Adjustment under A.R.S. § 11 -816 and P.C.C. § 18.93.060.
Please submit all plans, calculations and specifications to us electronically via the Digital Projects page in the online portal.
Comment ID Comment Date Corrections
Needed
Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments
2 08/21/262026 Yes Plan Set-WM
Tucson (Old
Vail) #05858_v2
-A3_v3.pdf
David Wilging : DSD Addressing Due to the development combining parcels 141186490 and 14118650A. The
addresses from these two parcels can be repurposed
3 08/21/262026 Yes Plan Set-WM
Tucson (Old
Vail) #05858_v2
-A3_v3.pdf
David Wilging : DSD Addressing The fuel station and the Walmart store will have two separate addresses
4 08/21/262026 Yes Plan Set-WM
Tucson (Old
Vail) #05858_v2
-A3_v3.pdf
David Wilging : DSD Addressing 10044 E Old Vail Rd
5 08/21/262026 Yes Plan Set-WM
Tucson (Old
Vail) #05858_v2
-A3_v3.pdf
David Wilging : DSD Addressing 10040 E Old Vail Rd
Re-Submittal Procedures
Please submit all documents using Citizen Access at permits.pima.gov (i.e. plans, drawings, calculations, quantities, exhibits, photographs, letters, etc.).
1. Please go to permits.pima.gov and login to your account to access review comments and resubmit.
2. If you have questions or need clarification regarding comments, please contact the reviewer.
3. Provide a response to each correction comment.
4. To resubmit, upload revised full plan set.
Should the resubmittal not completely address this request for corrections, the application maybe denied requiring a new application and payment all applicable
review fees in accordance withA.R.S. § 11-1605.
09/11/2026 NPPO Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT See site landscape comments for additional NPPO information and activity number reference on all NPPO sheets.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, PLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
09/09/2026 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Per presubmittal meeting, A traffic impact analysis (TIA) will be required. If right turn lanes or median modifications are required, a Private Improvement Agreement (PIA) will be required.
New driveways shall be constructed per new COT SD 206.
09/14/2026 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0726-00191
Project: Proposed Walmart 181,128 SF supercenter and fuel station
Location: 10002 E OLD VAIL RD
Review Date: 9/14/2026
Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate & Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer
Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov & joe.macaulay@tucsonaz.gov
Related cases:

Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards.
The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files.

Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference:
City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes
Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333
Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf
Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593

Site Engineering Review Comments:
1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0726-00191) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.4.3]
2. Provide the page number and total number of pages within the Development Package plan set (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on the bottom right corner of each page. [AM 2-06.4.2.D].
3. Revise the “City Civil Engineer” on the cover sheet to Alfred Zuniga P.E.
4. Clarification required – Drainage general note #2 – Provide clarification regarding the purpose of this note. It currently has a number provided, but it appears to be more related to the FIRM Panel ID rather than an actual parcel APN. Revise accordingly.
a. The same can be said regarding note #3 – the note simply refers to the FIRM Panel ID for the property.
5. Provide the general note: “Any Proposed signs will be approved per separate permit” [AM 2-06.4.7]
6. Waste stream calculations have not been provided. Provide the required waste stream calculations for the entire development. The calculations must be presented in table format and must: [TSM 8-01.8.0]
a. Break down waste generation by use type and unit count (e.g., number of residential units, commercial square footage, etc.) using the generation rates prescribed in TSM 8-01.8.0.
b. Identify the total estimated solid waste and recycling volumes generated by the development on a periodic basis (weekly or per collection cycle).
c. Demonstrate that the number, size, and configuration of the proposed enclosures and dumpster containers are adequate to accommodate the calculated waste volumes between collection intervals.
d. State how solid waste and recyclables will be handled and collected, including the proposed collection frequency.
7. The plans do not demonstrate compliance with TSM 8-01.5.1.A, which requires that adequate space be provided for both solid waste and recycling collection services. Revise the plans to clearly show that each proposed enclosure provides designated, separate space for solid waste containers and recycling containers.
8. Site plan (Sheet C41.0) - Revise the site plan provided to provide Sight visibility triangles for all site entrances: Old Vail RD is designated as a Collector Road. This designation will be used for Table 5.3. Refer to TSM 10-01.9.0 Figures 16-18 for examples of SVTs. [TSM 10-01.5.0.]
a. Confirm that no proposed structures, walls, signs, landscaping, or other vertical elements exceeding the allowable height limit encroach within the established SVT at any site access point. Where conflicts exist, the site design must be revised to achieve full compliance.
9. Site Plan sheets – Revise all site plan sheets to denote the proposed height of the proposed new Walmart and fuel canopy on plan view.
10. Overall Site Plan (Sheet C29.0) – There are several locations for the WB-50 that show the path over curb and gutter and landscaping. Please adjust to avoid these path conflicts.
11. Grading plan (Sheet 4) – it’s not entirely clear based on the spot elevations provided – demonstrate that vertical separation requirements are met per TSM 7-01.4.2 between the PAAL’s and pedestrian areas across the site. The TC vs FS elevations should demonstrate that the vehicle use area is effectively contained as required. [UDC 7.4.6.H].
12. Sidewalks associated with PAALs must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation (minimum six inches), barriers, railings, or other means, except at designated crosswalks [TSM 7-01.4.2]. This will need to be addressed along the northern (Front) portion of the new Walmart as the Grading plan sheets show no grade differential between the PAAL and associated sidewalk area. If it is intended for the sidewalk to be flush with the parking area, then this will require the use of bollards and/or other architectural features to ensure that pedestrian areas are effectively protected from the vehicle use area. Ensure they (bollards) are spaced no less than 4-ft and no more than 5-ft separate UDC 7.4.6. Provide a measurement call-out on the site plan view.
13. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to all proposed basins on the Grading plans. Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. This can be done through an additional detail sheet or included on current basin detail sheet if the grading plans appear too narrow for such details. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box: [DSSDR 11.1.3] - Notice: some information is acknowledged, but ensure this list is referenced and the descriptors updated accordingly.
a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet; 
b. detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet; 
c. retention volume, cubic feet; d. 
d. first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; 
e. Q100 in, cubic feet per second; 
f. Q100 out, cubic feet per second; 
g. Basin top elevation, feet; 
h. 100-year water surface elevation, feet; 
i. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet.
14. All proposed retention and detention basins must be provided with a minimum of one sediment level measurement device per basin in accordance with DSSDR Section 4.4.1.4. The device may be incorporated into the basin outlet weir structure, embedded in the basin side slope, or constructed as a separate standalone marker. The device must be located where sediment is most likely to accumulate within the basin. Address the following on the plans:
a. Add a keynote and corresponding call-out on the grading sheets identifying the sediment level measurement device at each basin location.
b. Provide a construction detail for the selected device type showing its dimensions, materials, installation method, and graduated measurement markings.
c. The device detail and placement must be consistent across all three basins and must be incorporated into the inspection and maintenance protocol required by DSSDR Section 4.1.1.
15. Erosion Protection – Sheet 57 shows the southern storm drainage system leading towards the intended basin. Revise plan view sheets (Site, Grading, Utilities) to show applicable erosion protection for these outlets accordingly.
16. Regarding the truck loading area at the south - Depressed loading areas are subject to strict drainage regulations to prevent flooding/ponding, particularly relevant in heavy commercial or industrial zones. If a pump is required to drain a depressed area it must be drained down within 4 hours and conform to Tucson Water standard specs, Section 1204 and DSSDR Section 4.18. COT Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management in Tucson, Arizona.
a. Provide a close-up grading construction detail of the grocery store loading dock area to demonstrate compliance with necessary slope gradients and elevations.
17. Please provide a detail or standard detail for the “Wind Breaks” called out to be installed on the windward sides of the construction areas in the SWPPP plan sheets.
18. It is unclear with the information shown in the plans and drainage report how the stormwater pipe locations interact with the “Above ground Detention Basin #4” location. See Drainage Report Comment #24.
19. Show the 2-foot minimum bench grading setback from the property line on the grading plan TSM 2-01.9.0. A reduced setback will require geotechnical justification that no adverse impacts will be caused by the proximity of grading and drainage infrastructure within the minimum 2-foot setback. This will need to be reviewed across all details and grading limits between lot boundaries.

Drainage Report Comments:
20. Drainage report needs to be signed and sealed by an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer responsible for preparation of the report. Drainage Manual [2.3.1.1.F]
21. Introduction (100) - Revise the introduction scope bullet item 5 to include the City of Tucson and Pima County regarding standards for retention and detention.
22. Section 100 – Revise the section to include the objective of “Meeting compliance with Rita Ranch Master Drainage plan”
23. Clarification required – the report repeatedly points to a separate basin – “To be designed by others” – when referencing the fuel canopy portion of the development. It is required that all drainage infrastructure be built concurrently with proposed improvements which trigger said drainage requirements, it will need to be demonstrated how the drainage requirements for the fuel canopy portion will be addressed.
24. It is unclear from looking at the plans how the “Above Ground Detention Basin #4” shown on the Post Development Hydrology Exhibit within the drainage report will be constructed as the grading layout for this is not shown within the development plan set. Please provide this basin within the plan set for construction.
a. Please provide a cross section of this basin in relation to the onsite development within the plans.
b. Further comments may be forthcoming regarding this basin once additional information is presented within the plan set.
25. A Long-Term Maintenance Responsibility section is absent from the report. This section is required by Drainage Manual Section 2.3.1.2.E and must identify the entity responsible for maintaining all proposed drainage improvements, including any retention/detention basins, outlet structures, and any riprap erosion protection. This section should immediately follow the Procedures/Methodology section. [Drainage Manual 2.3.1.2.E]
26. Section I – ensure to include a “Required Permits” section that demonstrated that whether any other or no governmental permits are required for the scope of development. [Drainage Manual 2.3.1.2.F]
a. As work is shown to experience regulatory flows (Greater than 100 CFS), a Floodplain Use Permit from the City of Tucson will be required.
27. Include within section 100.4, a table similar to Table 2.2 in DSSDR 2.2. This should break down how the first flush requirement was determined as well as demonstrate how much each drainage improvement achieves.
28. Provide an inspection and maintenance protocol including frequency of inspection, a checklist of items to be inspected and recommended maintenance when an inspection identifies a maintenance requirement and shall be prepared by an Arizona registrant. The protocol may be included in the project drainage report or prepared as a separate document. The protocol shall be reviewed and approved by the Floodplain Administrator prior to approval of the tentative plat or development plan. The protocol shall be delivered to the entity responsible for inspection and maintenance. An example of a detention basin inspection and maintenance checklist is provided in Appendix F. DSSDR 4.1.1. [Drainage Manual 2.3.1.6.C]
29. Summary and Conclusions Section 100.7 - This section should include, at minimum, the following:
a. A certification by the Engineer of Record, under seal, that the proposed drainage plan — once properly constructed — will adhere to all applicable Local, State, and Federal Floodplain Regulations
09/11/2026 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: PROPOSED WALMART SUPERCENTER AND FUEL STATION
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0726-00191
RELATED PRE APPLICATION ACTIVITY NO: TP-PRE-0226-00040 - PARCEL: 14118008Q
ADDRESS: 10002 E OLD VAIL RD
ZONING: PAD-36 HOUGHTON TOWN CENTER PAD
LAND USE: COMMERCIAL RETAIL
9.11.2026

THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM).

RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. A placeholder sheet has been provided for the rainwater harvesting plan. With the next submittal provide the drainage schematic showing the recessed planting areas. Include pertinent information from the grading plan on the rainwater harvesting plan, e.g. spot elevations, flowlines from building and along hardscape areas, curb cut locations and top contour of the WHIA basins.

2. Include SVTs at all vehicle access points on the planting plans.

3. Label the existing and future ROW lines and property lines on all sheets.

4. Sheet L5.5 has some plants overlapping a utility structure. Update as necessary.

5. A small sheet key map on each sheet is not required but would be helpful for review and inspections.

6. Add a section of general notes on the landscape cover sheet that clearly outlines the PAD requirements and how the landscape standards are being met, e.g. “plants used for this planting scheme can all be found on the provided plant list found within the PAD Document page x.” The pre-application includes most of the PAD requirements and can be found on PRO or TDC Online (TP-PRE-0226-00040). Review the comments and the PAD document and provide compliance information.

7. The southern landscape border appears to have special conditions as shown and strays from typical UDC standards. Please provide details with regard to how these specific conditions came to be required, e.g. a rezoning, entitlements case, PDSD administrative guidance and approval, or where these requirements can be found in the PAD document.

8. Prior to site landscape approval, ensure that Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed.

9. Include the Activity Number TD-DEV-0726-00191 on all sheets in the plan set.

10. Overall, the landscape plan set is substantially complete and looks great.

Thank you.

CHAD KELLER - PLA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

CITY OF TUCSON - PDSD
CHAD.KELLER@TUCSONAZ.GOV
520.837.4923
09/10/2026 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey Cassidy – Planner I
PDSD Current Zoning Review Section - Commercial

PROJECT: Proposed Walmart 181,128 SF supercenter and fuel station
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0726-00191 10002 E OLD VAIL RD TUCSON, AZ 85747 PAD-36 ZONING

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 10, 2026

Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is July 13, 2027.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

1. COMMENT: Include the missing section corners, and the section, township, and range within the project-location map on the C1.0 sheet. (AM 2-06.4.1.A.3).

2. COMMENT: Include a reduced-scale map of the PAD, indicating the location of the portion being developed. (AM 2-06.4.1.A.4).

3. COMMENT: A title block on each sheet that includes the page number and total number of pages within the Development Package plan set (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on the bottom right corner of each page (Refer to Comment 1). (AM 2-06.4.1.B.5).

4. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0726-00191, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. (AM 2-06.4.1.B.6).

5. COMMENT: Add the Existing (Vacant) and Proposed Uses listed to Retail Use Group – General Merchandise Sales per Use Specific Standard(s) 4.9.13.Q and Retail Use Group – Retail Establishment, Large per USS 4.9.9.D & 4.9.13.Q (AM 2-06.4.2.D).

6. COMMENT: Add general note(s) indicating that this development is subject to the Major Streets and Routes UDC 5.4 and Airport Environs Zone (AEZ) per UDC 5.6 (AM 2-06.4.2.F).

7. COMMENT: On the C29.0 sheet breakout the vehicular / bicycle (short and long term) / EV / ADA / loading spaces ‘required’ and ‘proposed’ numbers between the General Merchandise building (Fueling station building) and the Large Retail Establishment building. (AM 2-06.4.2.J).

8. COMMENT: Per UDC 7.4.11.B.1., The required EVSE parking spaces shall be based upon the total number of parking spaces provided following any approved parking reductions or modifications. For the Retail – General Merchandise Use, refer to UDC 7.4.11.B.3. Update numbers on the C29.0 sheet. (AM 2-06.4.2.J).

9. COMMENT: As stated in the pre-application conference (TP-PRE-0226-00040), the proposed project will require lot combinations, including a lot split, to function as a single site, under single ownership, and as part of a unified development. Indicate the recorded sequence numbers that were created with the County. (AM 2-06.4.7.B).

10. COMMENT: Provide missing zoning (labels) for all surrounding / adjacent parcels (Including across the right of way for E Old Vail Rd) (AM 2-06.4.7.F).

11. COMMENT: In the footprint of the buildings on the site plan sheet(s), provide the heights of both the fueling station building, large retail building, drive thru pharmacy and fueling canopies (and provide clearance dimensions) (AM 2-06.4.7.H).

12. COMMENT: Even though this project is on its own two 141-18-008Q parcels (post lot split and lot combinations), it is recognized as a single site with parcels Block M and 141-18-6520 due to the shared access and these parcels functioning as a unified site, please submit a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with your next submittal. The Covenant can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/covenant-regarding-development-and-use-of-real-property-udc-with-release.pdf. (AM 2-06.4.7.I).

13. COMMENT: Revise the site plan provided to provide Sight visibility triangles for all site entrances per TSM 10-01 (AM 2-06.4.7.Q.2).

14. COMMENT: Provide loading area Type and Dimensions. (AM 2-06.4.7.Q.4).

15. COMMENT: Demonstrate compliance with Per UDC Table 7.4.7-1 and 7.4.7.B for the proposed pharmacy drive-thru. (AM 2-06.4.7.Q.4).

16. COMMENT: Demarcate on the site plan sheets where the EV Capable spaces are slated to be located. (AM 2-06.4.7.Q.4).

17. COMMENT: Demonstrate connectivity to the adjacent 141-18-6520 to/from the newly created parcel One. (AM 2-06.4.7.S).

18. COMMENT: Demonstrate connectivity from the fueling station and retail building to their respective trash enclosures (AM 2-06.4.7.S).

19. COMMENT: For E Old Vail Rd, provide public or private label and recordation type. (AM 2-06.4.7.V.1).

20. COMMENT: Provide the general note: “Any Proposed signs will be approved per separate permit” [AM 2-06.4.7.AA].

21. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other PDSD reviewer comments.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit revised drawings and any corrected plans along with a detailed response letter, stating how all Site Zoning Review comments were addressed.

**Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.

***For additional information on the standards presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov
08/18/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added Addressing, PAG, SWG, USPS and TEP to the workflow. FYI notice sent out to PAG, SWG, USPS and TEP.
08/18/2026 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
08/18/2026 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
08/18/2026 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
08/31/2026 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
08/17/2026 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
09/15/2026 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED