Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0726-00190
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/14/2026 | NPPO Standard | APPROVED | Include the activity number on the nppo sheets with your next submittal. Thank you. Chad Keller, PLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/20/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | APPROVED | |||
| N/A | Transportation Landscape Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 08/10/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The proposed 4” fire service for building #7 may not be connected to the 4” public water located in the alley north of building #7. The tap will need to be on the 6” water main in Lee St. 2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (8609-16A, 2498.91) is higher than the first floor elevation of the existing Building #2 (2498.14). Provide a backwater valve, if one does not currently exist, per Section 714.1, IPC 2024, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (8609-16A, 2498.91) is higher than the first floor elevation of the new Building #7 (2498.00). Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2024, as amended by the City of Tucson. If you have any questions about this review comment, I can be reached at Robert.Sherry@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 07/21/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Report Date: 07/20/2026 Description : null - Site Review; Commercial Development Address : 1635 CRAYCROFT RD RESIDE, TUCSON, AZ, 85712 Record Type : Addressing Document Filename : City Submittal: Plan Set-1_Plan Set Reviewer Contact Information: Corrections in the following table need to be applied before a plan is approved Review Report - Resubmittal Requested Application Number: P26AD00542 Comment ID Comment Date Corrections Needed Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments DSD Addressing 1 07/20/262026 Yes 3 SITE PLAN David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building 5 (Typ) 2 07/20/262026 Yes 3 SITE PLAN David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building 6 (Typ) 3 07/20/262026 Yes 4 GRADING+ DRAINAGE PLAN David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building 1 General Comments Pima County Public Works 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ 85701 If you have any questions please call 520- 724-6490 for an appointment to discuss this notice. If following discussions with staff you still disagree with the below listed deficiencies, you may appeal to the Building Official in accordance with Pima County Code 15.04.060 by submitting the form posted on our web site with payment of appeal fee prior to permit application expiration. Disputes about the interpretation of the Zoning Code may be appealed to a Pima County Board of Adjustment under A.R.S. § 11 -816 and P.C.C. § 18.93.060. Please submit all plans, calculations and specifications to us electronically via the Digital Projects page in the online portal. Comment ID Comment Date Corrections Needed Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments 4 07/20/262026 Yes 4 GRADING+ DRAINAGE PLAN David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building 4 5 07/20/262026 Yes 4 GRADING+ DRAINAGE PLAN David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building identified by separate address. 1635 N Craycroft Rd 6 07/20/262026 Yes 4 GRADING+ DRAINAGE PLAN David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building 5 7 07/20/262026 Yes 4 GRADING+ DRAINAGE PLAN David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building 2 8 07/20/262026 Yes 4 GRADING+ DRAINAGE PLAN David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building 6 9 07/20/262026 Yes 4 GRADING+ DRAINAGE PLAN David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building 3 Re-Submittal Procedures Please submit all documents using Citizen Access at permits.pima.gov (i.e. plans, drawings, calculations, quantities, exhibits, photographs, letters, etc.). 1. Please go to permits.pima.gov and login to your account to access review comments and resubmit. 2. If you have questions or need clarification regarding comments, please contact the reviewer. 3. Provide a response to each correction comment. 4. To resubmit, upload revised full plan set. Should the resubmittal not completely address this request for corrections, the application maybe denied requiring a new application and payment all applicable review fees in accordance withA.R.S. § 11-1605. |
||
| 08/03/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0726-00190 (1st Review) Project: Restricted Records Interior improvements to existing multi-family residential complex involving multiple structures. Location: 5411 E LEE ST Review Date: 8/3/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate & Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0726-00190) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.3] 2. Revise general note #15 – the City of Tucson adopted The IBC 2024 with ICC A117.1 2017 edition at the beginning of 2026 a. Update Keynote #29 (Sheet 3) accordingly. 3. Provide complete trash enclosure construction details in compliance with TSM 8-01.5.0. Details must address wall materials, wall height, gate type and swing, foundation, and enclosure dimensions. It is strongly encouraged that the figures presented in TSM 8-01.9.0 be used as the minimum basis for the enclosure and dumpster layout details shown on the plans. a. This will need to be addressed regarding the new dumpster proposed at the Southwest corner and southcentral portion of the development. b. As this proposal is an expansion to a commercial site with existing dumpster service but no built enclosures, Environmental services approval will be required to accept that they will have no issues in regard to servicing this commercial property within this method (Dumpsters without established enclosures). The contact to reach out to at ES will be Andy Vera at Andy.vera@tucsonaz.gov. Please submit the approval provided for the resubmission of this development package. c. If approval is given, ensure to be aware that this request will be managed as a TSMR which will require the submission of a Technical Standards Modification Request at time of resubmission of this development package. 4. Clarification required – regarding the vehicle access gates (3 total) – denote on the site plan (Sheet 3) which gates are intended for everyday use vs. emergency access only. a. In regard to the Southeastern most vehicle gate area – are pedestrian gates also proposed similar to the northern gate access? If so, ensure to update plan view with applicable keynote references. Grading & Drainage Comments: 5. Basin Setbacks from both existing and proposed Structures. Dimension on the grading plan the setbacks from all proposed & existing structures to all detention, retention, and water harvesting basins, and demonstrate compliance with the following minimums: a. Stormwater harvesting basins: minimum 10 feet from structures, measured from the top of the basin slope, or the minimum setback specified in a geotechnical report for the project. [DSSDR §4.14.1.2 §5.3.1.11.d] The report explicitly states that based on the conditions of existing soil conditions, 10-feet must be adhered to. b. It will be required that all proposed water harvesting areas proposed be reevaluated. c. Landscaping plans – Keynote 7 – The landscaping plans contain keynote #7 referencing proposed infiltrator system chamber. It will be required that these chambers systems adhere to the minimum setbacks established Drainage Report Comments: 6. The report does not demonstrate drain-down compliance for the proposed basins nor underground infiltrator chambers as required by DSSDR Section 4.5. The resubmission must include a dedicated section that calculates and documents the drain-down time for each basin using results from site-specific infiltration testing. The section should showcase this drain down compliance using the results from the required infiltration testing completed. 7. Provide all City of Tucson Hydrologic Data sheets within the drainage document used for computing the 2-, 10-, & 100-year peak discharges. Pima County Data sheets will not be solely accepted. a. Ensure to use the required 3-inches for the areally reduced one-hour rainfall depth for calculations found in COT Drainage Manual Table 4.1. 8. Provide an inspection and maintenance protocol including frequency of inspection, a checklist of items to be inspected and recommended maintenance when an inspection identifies a maintenance requirement and shall be prepared by an Arizona registrant. The protocol may be included in the project drainage report or prepared as a separate document. The protocol shall be reviewed and approved by the Floodplain Administrator prior to approval of the tentative plat or development plan. The protocol shall be delivered to the entity responsible for inspection and maintenance. An example of a detention basin inspection and maintenance checklist is provided in Appendix F. DSSDR 4.1.1. [Drainage Manual 2.3.1.6.C] |
||
| 08/14/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: INTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX INVOLVING MULTIPLE STRUCTURES ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0726-00190 ADDRESS: 5411 E LEE ST -- AVONDALE SUBDIVISION MP 04042 RECORDED: NOVEMBER 6, 1923 ZONING: RESIDENCE ZONE (R-2) 8.14.2026 THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM). RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Overall, the plans look great and appear to be in compliance with UDC landscape standard for landscape borders and parking lot trees. A pre-application meeting was not completed for this project that I am aware of. This appears to be a tenant improvement project with minimal expansion of building area and optional landscape site improvements at the interior of the site. Please provide an overview of the project for landscape requirements and prior coordination with storm to shade and site zoning for review purposes. A summary on the landscape cover sheet about the project or an email directed to me would be great. 2. The storm to shade improvement plans are stated by others on the cover sheet? It appears that the entire landscape plan set is done by the same design firm. 3. The rainwater harvesting percentage is currently reaching only 38 percent. If there has been coordination with the storm to shade review section with regard to allowing a lower percentage, then please include reasoning and correspondence between parties. 4. PER THE ABOVE: This is an existing site and achieving the required 50 percent will be a serious challenge. I am ok with the percentage being 38 percent, as you have made a reasonable effort to achieve the requirement. 5. Some of the WHIA shown on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan do not match up with the basins shown on the grading and drainage plan. Please coordinate with the site civil to make sure the plans match with basin size and location. 6. It appears that basins are tied together with plastic pipes. If any scuppers are needed for excess water, please coordinate this information with the civil engineer. 7. ROW landscape approval is required for all landscape elements located in the ROW. David Marhefka is being added to the review cycle. 8. Prior to site landscape approval, ensure that Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed. 9. Include the Activity Number TD-DEV-0726-00190 on all sheets in the plan set. Thank you. CHAD KELLER - PLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CITY OF TUCSON - PDSD CHAD.KELLER@TUCSONAZ.GOV 520.837.4923 |
||
| 07/16/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/20/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Addressing, PAG, SWG, USPS, and TEP to workflow. FYI notice sent to PAG, SWG, USPS, and TEP. | ||
| 07/20/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/20/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/20/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/20/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/10/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/16/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/16/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/04/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/06/2026 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |