Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0726-00176
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/07/2026 | NPPO Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 07/22/2026 | Design Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | A complete SMD Design Package needs to be submitted and approved prior to approval of the Development Package. If you have any questions, please let me know: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you. | ||
| 08/03/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Add midlblock ramp south of new driveway in the ROW. | ||
| 07/23/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0726-00176 (1st Review) Project: Add parking lot, demolish existing structure, and renovate existing buildings. Location: 1046 E BROADWAY BL Review Date: 7/23/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate & Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0726-00176) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.3] 2. Revise general note #8 – the City of Tucson adopted The IBC 2024 with ICC A117.1 2017 edition at the beginning of 2026 3. Provide the following general note: A single property owner, property management company, or homeowners association (HOA), will be responsible for the management and maintenance of the solid waste collection services and storage area(s) for all development/business occupants. [TSM 8-01.5.1.D] 4. Revise parking calculations to show how many ADA parking spaces are provided that are considered VAN spaces. 5. Sidewalks associated with PAALs must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation (minimum six inches), barriers, railings, or other means [TSM 7-01.4.2]. a. This will need to be addressed for the pathway connection directly south of the northern parking spaces associated with the WILDCAT smoke shop as it connects towards the southern parking lot. The pathway is shown to be parallel to the alleyway. 6. Dimension the back-up spur distance/space shown at the Western edge of the site’s parking area & Southern edge. [7.4.6.F.4.] 7. The following floodplain information is required to be shown on the development package documents. Revise all applicable sheets (Site, Grading, Landscaping) accordingly: [AM 2-06.4.9.N & Chapter 26-8.(b).(5)] a. Depict the 100-year flood limits with associated Water Surface Elevations (WSELs) for all flows of 100 cfs or greater. b. Identify and label all off-site runoff acceptance points and on-site runoff discharge points, including the type of each. c. Revise Sheets both the site plan and grading sheets to show the 100-year floodplain limits and associated WSELs as established regarding the wash that exists to the southern portion of the property. This information is required to confirm that the proposed development does not create adverse floodplain impacts. d. Applicable erosion hazard setback must be delineated. 8. A Technical Standard Modification Request (TSMR) will be required for the proposal of a reduced PAAL width as shown at the southernmost parking area (22’-8”). For resubmission, ensure to provide the TSMR request form so that review/approval can be given. 9. Provide keynotes and call-outs identifying all new and/or existing structure downspouts and sidewalk scupper locations on the grading plan & site plan sheets. Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges up to and including a ten-year frequency flood event, and drainage flowing across any pedestrian circulation path shall be conveyed under the path for up to and including the ten-year frequency flood events [TSM 7-01.4.1.E and 7-01.4.3.E]. a. This will need to be addresses as a new pathway is proposed along the Southern portion of the Existing WILDCAT smoke shop. 10. The grading plans lack sufficient spot elevation information at key drainage control points necessary to verify design intent and facilitate site inspections during and after construction. Provide spot elevations at all of the following locations: a. All curb cut inlet locations, showing both the top of curb elevation and the adjacent pavement grade at the inlet opening. b. All landscaped water harvesting area inlet and overflow points. c. All curb cut outlet locations, showing outlet invert elevation and the receiving grade immediately downstream. d. Top of curb versus finished pavement grade at key transitions throughout the site to confirm positive drainage and curb reveal are maintained as designed. 11. A trash truck maneuverability exhibit has not been provided. Provide a dedicated exhibit or detail demonstrating that a standard solid waste collection vehicle can safely access, maneuver to, and service all proposed trash enclosures on the site in compliance with TSM 8-01.5.3 and TSM 8-01.5.3.F. The exhibit must address the following: a. The turning radius and approach path of a standard collection vehicle for each enclosure(s) location. b. Demonstration that the required back-up distance and maneuverability clearances are achievable within the proposed drive aisle and parking layout without conflict. c. Confirmation that collection vehicles can enter and exit the site in a forward direction, or, if backing is required, that the back-up distance and sight conditions comply with the requirements of TSM 8-01.5.3.F. d. Delineate the required clearance space in front of each container – 14x40 12. Clarification required – the plans show the front entrance of WILDCAT smoke shop having a ramp. Based on historical proceedings with this property by Site Engineering, from previous discussions, there should exist a newly established ramp that extended towards the East where what appears to be bicycle parking proposed. Revise accordingly. a. Revise keynote #25 shown on the Northeast corner of the existing building. 13. Clarification required – The area where the trash containers are proposed, is reference with keynote #1 “Existing Asphalt to remain,” but the landscaping plans show plants and trees proposed along the Eastern boundary of this area. Provide clarification in the intended design of the open area, and how the trash containers will effectively be serviced through this intended location. 14. W.A.S.H. Ordinance - The Arroyo Chico Wash carries a W.A.S.H. (Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat) designation per Tucson Code Chapter 29, Article VIII. The following items must be addressed: a. Delineate the Study Area on both the site plan and grading plan. The Study Area consists of the channel, the banks, and the land area extending fifty (50) feet outward from the banks of the wash. b. It must be demonstrated why the resource area cannot be left in its natural condition. No development—including grubbing, grading, removal of vegetation, channelization, or any other alteration of the land—may occur within the resource area unless a mitigation plan is submitted to and approved by the Development Services Department Director in accordance with Section 29-17. c. The mitigation plan must include the proposed wash treatment and a preservation/revegetation plan, and must demonstrate that (i) the loss of existing vegetation and wildlife habitat resulting from development within the resource area is minimized, and (ii) lost vegetation and habitat will be restored or recreated. Where a vegetated area is altered, the site must be revegetated to the same or greater density, diversity, and volume of vegetation as existed prior to the alteration. d. Revise the drainage report to include the analysis required under Section 29-15(1) for encroachment into the Study Area. Each required element of that analysis must be individually addressed. e. Per chapter 26 of the City code, no site improvements can be located within the erosion hazard setback. Includes required parking. Section 26-8. & Section 26-8.b.(5) https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19604. Revise the plans to show all proposed improvements outside the erosion hazard setback from Arroyo Chico wash 15. After review of the sites’ existing conditions & historic use of the site – coordination with Environmental Services will be required based on the following determinations: a. The site is proposing centralized trash service (Trash & Recycling) for three existing buildings. It appears that one container is currently existing while one new one for recycling is proposed. When a new waste container is proposed to effectively manage a site’s total waste generation, it is required that an enclosure be built to accommodate and house said container [TSM 8-01.5.1.B]. b. The site is proposing “Roll-out service” for the collection of the containers. 16. The contact to reach out to at ES will be Andy Vera at Andy.vera@tucsonaz.gov. Please submit the approval & directions/requirements provided by Andy for the resubmission of this development package. a. If approval is given, ensure to be aware that this request will be managed as a TSMR which will require the submission of a Technical Standards Modification Request at time of resubmission of this development package. Drainage Report: 17. The FEMA Panel referenced under Methodologies and Procedures (PDF Page 4) appears to be incorrect. The effective FIRM panel for this site is 04019C2277L. a. The same wrong number appears in the Works Cited, which also lists "June 13, 2016" as the map date—that's the LOMR revision date; the panel effective date is June 16, 2011. Same paragraph also contains "Flood Rate Insurance Rate Map" and "SHFA" (should be SFHA) 18. Existing Conditions (PDF Page 6) – there appears to be a mistype in describing the site’s existing watersheds – “The site contains there watersheds.” Revise accordingly. 19. Weir Design Consistency – The report describes wall openings functioning as the controlling weir for the proposed basin at the south portion of the development; however, this design is not shown in plan view. Revise the site plan and grading plan sheets to depict the weir openings consistent with the drainage report, including invert elevations and opening dimensions. a. The text states the weir wall openings are "distributed along the basing length of the north property line," but the basin is at the south end of the site discharging south into Arroyo Chico. Revise accordingly. b. The basin summary table shows Weir Elev. = WSEL = Basin Top = 2410.0. If the weir crest equals the water surface elevation, there's zero head and the stated Q100 out of 3.6 cfs is not possible; and with weir crest at basin top, there's no freeboard. Revise to provide compliant freeboard requirements. c. The basin bottom is 2409.25 in the table but Figures 5 and 6 show "BOT 2408.70"—a 0.55' discrepancy that also changes the retention depth/volume calc (the first flush table uses 0.75' depth, consistent with 2409.25, not 2408.70). Revise so that the report and plan set are consistent in regard to design and proposed conditions. 20. Erosion Hazard Setback Analysis — Arroyo Chico - An Erosion Hazard Setback (EHS) analysis section is absent from the drainage report. In accordance with City of Tucson Drainage Manual Section 7.4, an EHS analysis is required in association with the Arryo Chico adjacent to the subject property. The EHS analysis shall be incorporated as a dedicated section within the drainage report. All regulated setback boundaries resulting from this analysis shall be depicted on all applicable plan sheets in a surveyable manner. 21. A Long-Term Maintenance Responsibility section is absent from the report. This section is required by Drainage Manual Section 2.3.1.2.E and must identify the entity responsible for maintaining all proposed drainage improvements, including any retention/detention basins, outlet structures, and any riprap erosion protection. This section should immediately follow the Procedures/Methodology section. [Drainage Manual 2.3.1.2.E] 22. A comparative summary table presenting existing versus proposed peak discharges has not been provided. Provide a table addressing all applicable storm events (2-, 10-, and 100-year) and demonstrating compliance with balanced basin detention requirements. 23. The Arroyo Chico wash carries a W.A.S.H. designation. As such, provide a dedicated section within the drainage report that discusses compliance with applicable W.A.S.H. Standards. [Sec 29 Article 8] 24. Summary and Conclusions Section - The report does not contain a complete Summary and Conclusions section as required by Drainage Manual Section 2.3.1.7. This section should be added and shall include, at minimum, the following: a. A concise summary of all significant analyses and conclusions presented in the report, including compliance with City of Tucson first flush retention and critical basin detention requirements b. A certification by the Engineer of Record, under seal, that the proposed drainage plan — once properly constructed — will adhere to all applicable Local, State, and Federal Floodplain Regulations 25. Section I – ensure to include a “Required Permits” section that demonstrated that whether any other or no governmental permits are required for the scope of development. [Drainage Manual 2.3.1.2.F] a. As work is shown to encroach into the established erosion hazard setback area, a Floodplain Use Permit from the City of Tucson will be required. 26. Soils description garbled: "The site contains Hydrologic Type 100% C soils, and Hydrologic Type 100% D soils” - both can't be 100%. Figure 2 shows two units (86/HSG C and 11/HSG D); state the actual split, and reconcile with the data sheets, which use different soil assumptions per watershed (E1 at 100% D, E2 at 40% C–60% D). 27. The First Flush section references water harvesting areas "depicted on Figure 7 in Appendix A," but the appendix contains only Figures 1–6. Revise accordingly. 28. E1 parameter check: Existing Watershed E1 is described as the unpaved south portion, yet the data sheet assigns "Moderately Urban" with 45% imperviousness and Cw = 0.86. Verify this reflects actual existing cover—overstating existing imperviousness inflates the existing peak and makes the detention comparison look more favorable. 29. Refer to comment #14 – Provide a dedicated section within the drainage report that demonstrates this proposed developments’ compliance with applicable W.A.S.H. standards. |
||
| 08/07/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: ADD PARKING LOT, DEMOLISH EXISTING STRUCTURE, AND RENOVATE EXISTING BUILDINGS. THIS PROJECT IS ELIGIBLE FOR THE SMD REVIEW PROCESS PER TP-PRE-1225-00255 ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0726-00176 ADDRESS: 1046 E BROADWAY BL ZONING: COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-3); SUNSHINE MILE DISTRICT LAND USE: COMMERCIAL 8.7.2026 THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM). RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. The project description/summary acknowledges the Sunshine Mile District and its possible use for this project site. Please define if this project is opting into the SMD. SMD has some additional site landscape requirements, IE: Shade and DRB review. 2. Clearly define that a separate irrigation only meter is provided for this development package and this commercial rainwater harvesting plan. The associated site and DP number TD-DEV-0225-00044 provides a meter in the same location as shown on this plan set. For Tucson Water Conservation Department tracking the meter used for the north parking area plants can not be associated with the commercial rainwater harvesting on this new DP number TD-DEV-0726-00176. 3. Include SVT linework and callouts along E Freemont St entry. Callout the existing/future ROW/property line as well. 4. Prior to site landscape approval, ensure that Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed. 5. Include the Activity Number TD-DEV-0726-00176 on all sheets in the plan set. Thank you. CHAD KELLER - PLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CITY OF TUCSON - PDSD CHAD.KELLER@TUCSONAZ.GOV 520.837.4923 |
||
| 08/07/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Jeffrey W. Cassidy, Planner Planning & Development Services Department – Current Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-DEV-0726-00176– Commercial – Add parking lot, demolish existing structure, and renovate existing buildings 1046 E BROADWAY BL TUCSON, AZ 85719 (C-3 & R-2 Zoning) Development Package Review – 1st Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 07, 2026 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-8753 This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 06, 2027. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0726-00176 adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 2. COMMENT: Add S Freemont Av. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 3. COMMENT: A simple google search indicates there are approximately two existing uses these 5 parcels would support of which include the following: - Retail - Smoke Shop per UDC 4.9.9.H - Retail - General Merch Sales per 4.9.9.B.1 and Additionally, a new third use, Commercial - Food Service, is being proposed (General Note #4). The existing and proposed uses are unclear and will require further clarification with percent uses broken out for all the uses (add these to the cover sheet). Include the use specific standards with each use. For clarification on definitions, refer to https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-7039 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 4. COMMENT: Revise the Major Streets and Routes UDC 5.4 and Airport Environs Zone (AEZ), UDC 5.6 to acknowledge the parcels affected by this overlay (124-12-0080, 124-12-0070 and 124-12-006A). 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 5. COMMENT: A complete Sunshine Mile District (SMD) Design Package needs to be submitted and approved prior to approval of the Development Package. If you have any questions, please contact maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov . 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. 6. COMMENT: Adjust General Note #2 to acknowledge the parcels affected by the Sunshine Mile District (124-12-0080, 124-12-0070 and 124-12-006A). 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 7. COMMENT: Provide percentage of total buildings and accessory buildings to the overall site. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, 8. COMMENT: Provide percentage of vehicular use area to the overall site. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 9. COMMENT: Provide this information for S Freemont Av and E Broadway Bl. 2-06.4.8.E – Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). 1. For land that slopes less than approximately 1%, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than one foot. Spot elevations shall be provided at all breaks in grade and along all drainage channels or swales and at selected points not more than 100 feet apart in all directions. 2. For land that slopes between approximately 1% and 5%, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than two feet. 10. COMMENT: Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). 2-06.4.8.F – Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. 11. COMMENT: Provide existing storm communication on drawings. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC). 12. COMMENT: Dimension the back-up spur distance/space shown at the Western edge of the site’s parking area (Lot 15) & Southern edge (Lot 16). [7.4.6.F.4.] 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 13. COMMENT: There are two proposed PAAL’s that do not meet the required 24’-0” dimensional standard for 90 degree parking. On parcel 124-12-006A, a 23.8’ dimension is proposed of which includes wheel stops within the right way (along the west edge of the existing building). On parcel 124-12-0200, a 22.8 dimension is proposed. A Parking Design Modification Request will be required to pursue getting these widths approved. For more information, refer to: Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR) https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-5769 https://beta.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/planning-development-services/documents/modification_request_application_for_parking_design_pdmr_or_technical_standard_tsmr.pdf Contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov and/or Stephen Blood at Stephen.Blood@tucsonaz.gov for more information. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 14. COMMENT: On parcel 124-12-006A, there five proposed parking spaces along the north and west portion of the parcel that do meet the 18’-0” length standard. A Parking Design Modification Request will be required to pursue getting the 16’-2” length approved. For more information, refer to: Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR) https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-5769 https://beta.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/planning-development-services/documents/modification_request_application_for_parking_design_pdmr_or_technical_standard_tsmr.pdf Contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov and/or Stephen Blood at Stephen.Blood@tucsonaz.gov for more information. Additionally, zoning cannot complete the review of the appropriate quantity of the required parking spaces until Comment #3 is clarified. Refer to UDC Table 7.4.4-1 for Minimum Motor Vehicles required by use https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-5445 . If applicable, some of the underlying zoning requirements might be modified through an approved SMD application. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 15. COMMENT: Zoning cannot complete the review of the appropriate quantity of the required parking spaces until Comment #3 is clarified. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 16. COMMENT: Provide missing Building setback dimensions per https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-4971 and https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-4930. MISCELLANEOUS: 17. COMMENT: Provide dimensions and square footage for all buildings/structures to be demolished. Consider providing a separate ‘demolition sheet’ to increase graphic clarity in the graphic communication on the site plan. 18. COMMENT: The scope speaks to ‘renovating existing buildings’ but zoning could not locate what, specifically is being renovated, the detail involved, the extent involved and where. Clarify and provide missing information. 19. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other the PDSD reviewer comments. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: 20. COMMENT: Corrected Development Package permit 21. COMMENT: Provide a detailed response letter with your submittal that clearly shows how you have addressed all Zoning comments. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home . Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/old-pdfs/double-old/resubmittals.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov The Unified Development Code (UDC) can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes/Zoning-Code . |
||
| 07/08/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/16/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Design, Historic, Adot, TAA, PAG, USPS, SWG, and TEP to the workflow. FYI notice sent out to PAG, USPS, SWG, and TEP. | ||
| 08/06/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/27/2026 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | ADOT has no comments. Thanks, Rick Freije |
||
| 07/16/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/21/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good morning, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0726-00176. Thank you, David Wilging Planner I - Addressing Division Pima County Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-724-6381 |
||
| 07/16/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/06/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | July 31, 2026 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0726-00176, 1st Submittal, Wildcat Shops on Broadway, 1046 E. Broadway Bl, Tucson, AZ. 85719, Received July 16, 2026 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0726-00176, 1st Submittal, a development plan for demolishing an existing building and constructing a new parking lot at 1046 E Broadway Boulevard. This development is located in the N.E. quarter of the N.W. quarter of Section 18, Township 14S, Range 14E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 124-12-0070, 124-12-0080, 124-12-0190, 124-12- 0200, covers approximately 0.98 ± acres, and is zoned as Commercial 3 Zone (C-3) and Residence 2 Zone (R-2). The nearest major roadway intersection is South Fremont Avenue and East Broadway Boulevard, approximately 200 feet to the northeast of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority does not object to the first submittal of this project and is not requiring a resubmittal. Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following notes into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 6 miles north of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. The proposed notes would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement and providing the Airport Disclosure Statement to the new residents of all residential uses. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson – Land Use 26. 1. "That prior to the City's approval of the proposed development, the property owner must record the Avigation Easement that discloses the existence and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner must complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder’s Office. Then send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Manager of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Blvd, Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756” 2. Applicable to residential uses only “The property owner/developer/applicant must provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with all new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit must be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The property owner (for itself or its tenants) shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority within ten (10) days of signature, using the Scott Robidoux mailing address provided above. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning cc file |
||
| 07/16/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/16/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/04/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/03/2026 | Historic | REVIEW COMPLETED | The Project Area is within the Sunshine Mile Historic District and contains three contributing historic buildings and one non-contributing building. The applicant has indicated they will opt-in to the Sunshine Mile District (SMD) optional overlay. An SMD Design Package will be required, and Historic review will be required for any exterior alterations, including any exterior alterations proposed to the historic buildings, the parking lot expansion, and proposed demolition of the non-contributing building. Please see the following application instructions for submittal requirements: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/special_districts_application_instructions_3.3.2025.pdf. Additionally, minor architectural review must be submitted as part of the application package for demolition. See the following link for instructions on how to submit architectural documentation as part of the demolition request: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/historic_demolition_application_form.pdf. For general questions about the SMD Design Package, please email Maria Gayosso: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. For questions pertaining to Historic Preservation, please email: Desiree Aranda at desiree.aranda@tucsonaz.gov. | ||
| 07/09/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/10/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/06/2026 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |