Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0726-00175
Parcel: 106060170

Address:
1380 W PRINCE RD

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0726-00175
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/06/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard APPROVED
08/07/2026 NPPO Standard NOT REQUIRED
08/04/2026 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Review as per comments from PRe-Application meeting -
Please address below comments:
1) Sidewalk meeting PAG 200 standards will be required along Prince Rd (Arterial 6' with Min 3' Buffer behind curb and sidewalk
2) Sidewalk along Flowing Wells will be required to be brough to Standard detail.
3) Flowing Well Driveway will be requested to meet PAG 206 driveway detail - with Sidewalk cross slope not to exceed 2%. Meeting TSM 10-01.4.3 Full Concrete construction
4) All unused Curb cuts will be required to be closed and restored.
5) Plans need to to call out and Show existing ROW and Future Row lines.
6) . Replace driveway on Prince Rd per PAG SD 206 - When Repaving of the Share PAAL access driveway occurs.
7) All work performed within the City of Tucson Right of Way will require the submission of Separate Right of Way Permits per scope of work being performed.
07/22/2026 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0726-00175 (1st Review)
Project: New Gas Station and Convenience Store
Location: 1380 W PRINCE RD
Review Date: 7/22/2026
Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate & Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer
Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
Related cases: TP-PRE-0326-00064

Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards.
The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files.

Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference:
City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes
Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333
Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf
Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593

Site Engineering Review Comments:
1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0726-00175) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.3]
2. Revise General Note #8 to read: No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual. [AM 2-06.4.7.C.2]
3. Site plan (Sheet 3) - Revise the site plan provided to provide Sight visibility triangles for all site entrances: Flowing Wells RD is designated as an Arterial Road. This designation will be used for Table 5.3. Refer to TSM 10-01.9.0 Figures 16-18 for examples of SVTs. [TSM 10-01.5.0.]
a. Confirm that no proposed structures, walls, signs, landscaping, or other vertical elements exceeding the allowable height limit encroach within the established SVT at any site access point. Where conflicts exist, the site design must be revised to achieve full compliance.
4. Site plan (sheet 3) – Keynote #11 (Trash Enclosure) appears to be incorrectly used at the proposed new apron along the West boundary of the development. Revise accordingly.
5. Provide keynotes and call-outs identifying all new and/or existing structure downspouts and sidewalk scupper locations on the grading plan & site plan sheets. Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges up to and including a ten-year frequency flood event, and drainage flowing across any pedestrian circulation path shall be conveyed under the path for up to and including the ten-year frequency flood events [TSM 7-01.4.1.E and 7-01.4.3.E].
6. Sidewalks associated with PAALs must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation (minimum six inches), barriers, railings, or other means [TSM 7-01.4.2].
a. The proposed pedestrian connection connecting the site to Frontage sidewalk along Prince RD will need to be revised to meet the requirements of TSM 7-01.4.1.A & 7-01.4.2. The core issue as proposed is pedestrians will be forced to walk directly through the vehicle use area with no form of vertical protection nor refugee location.
7. Provide dimensions for all PAAL widths shown on Site plan (Sheet 3).
Waste Management Comments:

8. The trash enclosure details and grading plan sheets must be revised to correctly show the required drainage slopes at and around all trash enclosure locations per TSM 8-01.0.0. The following slope requirements must be reflected on both the detail sheets and the grading plan for every enclosure on the project:
a. The approach ramp and surrounding pavement must slope at a minimum of 2% away from the enclosure to prevent water intrusion and standing water at the enclosure pad.
b. The enclosure slab must slope at a minimum of 1% toward the gate to drain away from the enclosure interior.
c. These slope requirements must be explicitly labeled and dimensioned on the grading sheets and the enclosure detail for each enclosure location. A generic note referencing compliance is not sufficient — slopes must be graphically shown and confirmed on the plans.
9. As this proposal is an expansion to a commercial site that utilizes APC’s, Environmental services approval will be required to accept that they will have no issues in regard to servicing this commercial property within this method (APC’s continuation). The contact to reach out to at ES will be Andy Vera at Andy.vera@tucsonaz.gov. Please submit the approval provided for the resubmission of this development package.
a. If approval is given, ensure to be aware that this request will be managed as a TSMR which will require the submission of a Technical Standards Modification Request at time of resubmission of this development package.
10. The plans do not demonstrate compliance with TSM 8-01.5.1.A, which requires that adequate space be provided for both solid waste and recycling collection services. Revise the plans to clearly show that each proposed APC provides designated separate space for solid waste containers and recycling containers.
11. Waste Stream Calculations (Sheet 2) – revise the calculations to include the entire square footage as they currently only show 559 SQ FT.
12. Existing electrical infrastructure – The location where the new trash enclosure is proposed is shown to have both electrical and communication lines running directly overhead. This will need to be addressed
a. Ensure to delineate the required clearance is 14x40 feet with a required height clearance of 25ft. TSM 8-01.0.0. Please show this required space delineated for the trash enclosure.
08/07/2026 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: NEW GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0726-00175
ADDRESS: 1380 W PRINCE RD
ZONING: COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-2)
LAND USE: COMMERCIAL
8.7.2026

THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM).

RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS

1. *THE PRE APPLICATION MEETING COMMENTS DATED 4.1.2026 UNDER ACTIVITY NUMBER TP-PRE-0326-00064 WERE NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS PLAN SET. SEE BELOW PRE APPLICATION COMMENTS FOR REFERENCE AND GUIDANCE IN THE PREPARATION OF A SIMPLE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLAN SET.

2. This site requires an update to the parking design. Any parking requirement/updates trigger parking lot canopy trees. Parking lot trees are required at a rate of 1 tree per 4 parking spaces within the parcel limits per UDC 7.6.4.B

3. A previously approve plan set exist for this site and that site plan includes landscape plant material at the corner of Prince and Flowering wells. For approval of this permit, the site must revert back to match the originally approved landscape plan. If a copy of the approved plans is needed for reference, then please let us know and a copy will be provided.

4. With the above-mentioned comments, with the formal submittal, please provide an updated set of site landscape plans. This plan set will need to include a planting plan, irrigation plan and all applicable details required to complete the work.

5. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION COMMENTS: **It is recommended that street landscape borders per UDC 7.6.4.C.2 and Table 7.6.4-1 be provided on this site. If it is decided that the site will be updated to current site landscape and screening standards, then the street landscape borders will need to be designed to the future ROW. Depress any landscape planting areas proposed on site and provide underground drip irrigation. In addition, to answer your pre-application landscape question, 5 feet of the ROW can be used to meet the 10-foot requirement with approval from DTM.

6. Prior to site landscape approval, ensure that Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed.

7. Include the Activity Number TD-DEV-0726-00175 on all sheets in the plan set.

Thank you.

CHAD KELLER - PLA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

CITY OF TUCSON - PDSD
CHAD.KELLER@TUCSONAZ.GOV
520.837.4923
08/06/2026 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO:
Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM:
Olga Salazar
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT:
1380 West Prince Road, Tucson, AZ 85705
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0726-00175

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 6, 2026

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 3rd, 2027.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – On the cover sheet, please provide the phone number and email address of the primary property owner.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0726-00175, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Note #3 under “General Notes” (Page #2) states that the existing use of the site is Retail Trade – Vehicle Rental and Sales. However, Zoning could not locate any records indicating that this use was previously approved. Please correct the existing and proposed use to Retail Trade – General Merchandise Sales, excluding large retail establishment, subject to use specific standard 4.9.9.B.1.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:


2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – On the site plan, add the floor area for the storage trailer and include this square footage in the parking calculations. Additionally, provide the square footage of the existing canopy. Please note that the canopy area shall not be included in the parking calculation.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide all zoning classifications (C-2 to the north, east, west, and south) adjacent to the project as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Revise the site plan provided to provide Sight visibility triangles for all site entrances: Flowing Wells Rd is designated as an Arterial Road. This designation will be used for Table 5.3. Refer to TSM 10-01.9.0 Figures 16-18 for examples of SVTs.


2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 - This site is adjacent to two Major Streets & Routes (Flowing Wells Rd and Prince Rd). Both have a proposed future ROW of 100 ft. Per paving plan I-821, Prince Rd currently has a ROW of 90 ft. Please confirm any future right-of-way (ROW) requirements with the Department of Transportation and Mobility, and show the future ROW lot lines and the corresponding setbacks on the site plan.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – On the site plan, indicate the width of all PAALs within the site to demonstrate compliance with UDC Table 7.4.6-2. Please note that two-way PAALs must have a minimum width of 24 feet, and one-way PAALs must have a minimum width of 10 feet.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – On Page #2 under parking calculation, please include the square footage of the storage trailer located to the north in the calculation. Also, include the total number of existing parking spaces on the site.


2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – On the site plan, indicate the total height of the storage trailer. Also, please include the proposed use of the existing building and storage area as a note under the square footage and height.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - The proposed pedestrian connection connecting the site to Frontage sidewalk along Prince RD will need to be revised to meet the requirements of TSM 7-01.4.1.A & 7-01.4.2. The core issue as proposed is pedestrians will be forced to walk directly through the vehicle use area with no form of vertical protection nor refugee location. Additionally, please ensure that the proposed crosswalk striping on the northwest portion of the site maintains pedestrian connectivity to the sidewalk along Flowing Wells RD.


2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Please indicate how the mail will be delivered and the location of the mailbox.


***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations***

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Olga Salazar at Olga.Salazar@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home.
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
07/07/2026 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
07/16/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added Adot, PAG, USPS, SWG, and TEP to the workflow. FYI notice sent out to PAG, USPS, SWG, and TEP.
07/27/2026 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED ADOT has no comments.

Thanks, Rick Freije
07/16/2026 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
07/16/2026 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
07/16/2026 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
07/16/2026 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required.
08/05/2026 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
07/08/2026 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
07/09/2026 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED