Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.5
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0725-00196
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.5
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/12/2026 | Floodplain Administration Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Previous comments not addressed as requested – All of the subsequent information requested such as the cross-section detail updates, clarification on height build-out, and engineering/registrant stamp appear to have been provided on the non-grading plan document. As all the information requested pertains to the overall grading scope proposal for this site, all details and subsequent grading information and development scope must be found on a current and compliant grading submission. As stated previously, the highlighted file will not be accepted as the construction document for the work proposed. Austin Wesnitzer 520-305-2376 Austin.Wesnitzer@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/12/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0725-00196 (3rd Review) Project: 172' of CMU block wall 3' tall 122' of landscape swell 2'-2'6" wide with 4"-8" rip rap 90' of landscape mounding compacted with filter fabric and rip rap 4"-8" modify existing catch basin 32' long x 2' wide x 2' deep with grate Location: 3453 E PIMA ST Review Date: 10/12/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Previous comments not addressed as requested – All of the subsequent information requested such as the cross-section detail updates, clarification on height build-out, and engineering/registrant stamp appear to have been provided on the non-grading plan document. As all the information requested pertains to the overall grading scope proposal for this site, all details and subsequent grading information and development scope must be found on a current and compliant grading submission. As stated previously, the highlighted file will not be accepted as the construction document for the work proposed. |