Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0725-00195
Parcel: 117041180

Address:
640 N STONE AV

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0725-00195
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/27/2025 Commercial Plumbing Standard APPROVED
08/29/2025 NPPO Standard NOT REQUIRED
08/13/2025 Real Estate Standard NOT REQUIRED Any proposed improvements located outside property lines and into public rights-of-way require a right-of-way permit and Private Improvement Agreement with the Department of Transportation & Mobility or Temporary Revocable Easement with the Real Estate Division (separate processes). If any action is required to address property rights (dedications, easements, etc), please contact the Real Estate Division 520-791-4181.
08/11/2025 Design Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT This property is within the boundaries of the Downtown Infill Incentive District (IID). If the IID will be used as a tool for redevelopment, please send me an email to maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov to arrange for a presubmittal meeting with a Design Professional and the Historic Preservation Office to go over IID and historic preservation requirements, and the IID review process: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/iid-application-and-review-process.pdf. Thank you.
09/18/2025 External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Include waste calculations to identify the potential service capacity for supporting solid waste (trash/recycle) volume. Proposed DP appears to expand the food waste, retail, and storage vendors which has the potential for exceeding current solid waste capacity. Refer to TSM 8-01.8.0.

Clarify, if feasible to provide on site storage within the development, which will require the waste containers (trash/recycle) to be rolled out to Echols Ave by facility staff. Current conditions require the trash container to obstruct the right-of-way which is a violation of city code. Refer to TSM 8-01.5.0

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding my comments.

Andy Vera
(520) 837-3798
Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov
08/22/2025 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Good morning,

Pima County Addressing approves the development plan for this project. We are returning the plan set for corrections.

Please see the attached resubmittal request.



Thank you,

David Wilging

Planner I – Addressing Division

Pima County Development Services Department

201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 724-6381
08/25/2025 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit: TD-DEV-0725-00195
Location: 640 N STONE AV
Review Date: 8/25/2025
Site Engineering Comments:
1. Revise sight visibility triangles and plan notes to reflect that Stone Ave is classified as an Arterial Road, not a collector street.
2. Revise the plans to show 6” vertical separation along the pedestrian pathway West of the patio south of Building A
3. Show that you are meeting the throat length requirements Access Management Guidelines 5.11
4. Edge of travel way from Stone to the first parking spot must be 60’ feet.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact
Marco Contreras
Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
08/29/2025 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: SITE PLAN FOR NEW BUILDING ADDITIONS AND ADDED USES
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0725-00195
ADDRESS: 640 N STONE AV
ZONING: C-3 COMMERCIAL ZONE

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape and NPPO Section review comments have been addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. The tree planting diamonds are currently 16 square feet (see redline SF areas on the plan). For minimum canopy tree planter bed size and width see UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a.(3) An unpaved planting area, which must be a minimum of 34 square feet in area and four feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree.

2. Add standard tree planting details. See details 400 and 401 for associated tree planting and tree staking. These details can be found here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects - (for your use in the completion of this development package)

3. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for trees located near hardscape areas. See Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects

4. The landscape/irrigation legend is calling out 4 mesquites. The plan only includes 3. Update the legend.

5. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0725-00195, adjacent to the title block on all site landscape sheets, per Administrative Manual 2-06.4.3

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
520.837.4923
08/28/2025 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Stone Brothers
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0725-00195

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 11, 2024

DUE DATE: May 11, 2024

COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 4, 2026.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0725-00195, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Label Echols Ave on the location map.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label the section corners on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – As a general note identify the existing use.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The proposed use listed under General Note 3 is not a use and it is not clear where you got the Use Specific Standard listed for the use. Note 3 should include all proposed uses along with any applicable Use Specific Standards.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Remove General Note 27 from the plan as AEZ and FHZ do not apply to this site.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Remove the reference to “ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE (GCR) from General Note 29 as Stone is not designated as a Gateway on the MS&R Map.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – Provide site boundary bearings in degrees, minutes, and seconds for all property lines.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide a distance from face of curb to the west property line dimension the sidewalk along Stone.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4 are met for the proposed parking area.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a standard vehicle parking space detail.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Under the parking calculation you reference UDC 7.4.6.B.1. Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of 7.4.6.B.1.b, & .d are met. On street parking does not work. If you want to use on street parking an Individual Parking Plan will need to be submitted and approved.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Cleary demonstrate how parking vehicles will prevented from overhang the south property line near the southwest corner of the site.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Following discussions with staff, Elisa Hamblin, Zoning Administrator, the use “FITNESS” is considered a Commercial Recreation use and therefore the 1 space per 200 SF is not correct and should be 1 space per 300 SF.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- and long-term bicycle parking calculation on the plan.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.f & .g are met for the short-term bicycle parking.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Cleary show the location of the proposed long-term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail that clearly demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D are met.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b for nonresidential and multifamily development abutting a Local Street: the minimum required street perimeter yard is 20 feet, as measured from the street property line, proposed setback to the east property line, Echols Ave. is 0’-0”. A Board of Adjustment for Variance will need to be submitted and approved. An option to reduce the setback would be to go through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District (IID), UDC Article 5.12, process for this site.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.3.3 are met from all proposed building to all existing buildings.

20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks shown on the plan.

21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – The pedestrian walk striping called out under Keynote 17 must be a sidewalk, TSM Section 7-01.4.1.D, meeting the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.2 & .3

22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – The proposed short-term bicycle parking appears to encroach into the required sidewalk width, clearly demonstrate that the minimum width is maintained, TSM Section 7-04.4.3.A.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
07/29/2025 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
08/06/2025 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED EXTERNAL REVIEWERS
CDRC added ADOT, ADDRESSING, DESIGN PROF, REALESTATE, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, SWG USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent to and ADOT, and ADDRESSING, FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG.
08/15/2025 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Good Afternoon,

ADOT has not comments on this DEV.

Thank you for the opportunity to review.
08/06/2025 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED FYI
CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
08/06/2025 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED FYI
CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
08/06/2025 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED FYI
CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
08/27/2025 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
08/05/2025 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
07/31/2025 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
08/08/2025 ROW Engineering Review Standard REVIEW COMPLETED DTM ROW Engineering has no comments.