Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0725-00192
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/16/2025 | Floodplain Administration Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TO: Bill O'Brien, PE, CFM RE: Wrightstown HOA Erosion/Scour Protection Project TE-FPU-0625-00259, TD-DEV-0725-00192 DATE: 16DEC25 (previously provided via email November 5, 2025) Please address the following comments: 1) UDC Sec 7.14.4.1.3.1: Please note that a Floodplain Use Permit approval required prior to construction activity. 2) TS Sec 4-04.1.5: Revised drainage report and plans shall be submitted with the Floodplain Use Permit application to address the following conditions: a) TS Sec. 2-01.9: Revise sheet 3 of Grading Plan to show proposed grading for spurs exclusively located within the HOA Common Area with 2-ft setback from property line. b) Add to report that the project is located within the City of Tucson limits and the Robb Wash Watershed (TSMS id: MW) which is part of Tucson Stormwater Management Study master plan (TSMS). This watershed is originally designated as non-designated watershed management area and adopted in 2020 as a Balanced Basin Management Plan area. c) Clarify in report how the proposed spurs do not increase adverse impact to adjacent properties. The existing & proposed overlay floodplain exhibit provided in this last submittal shows adverse impacts to existing driveway of neighbouring parcel and therefore proposed spurs can not be accepted as designed. d) Add verbiage to clarify that spurs are proposed for engineering justification and / or per City of Tucson Drainage Manual section 4-04.9.5.2 (slow erosive velocities) and state that downstream conditions are generally not impacted as downstream existing channel indicates signs of erosive degradation and / or other reasons. e) In report, clarify that project is designed to meet City of Tucson drainage requirements (it is not required to meet county regulations when located in the city jurisdiction although consultant may recommend using additional or other methodologies than City of Tucson drainage regulations with engineering justification). f) Label Channel Section detail numbering on grading plan sheet 4 as seen on sheet 3. g) Add notation regarding agitation of rock and other installation requirements for gabions to grading plan notes or planviews. h) If required by PDSD, submit ERR report as appendix to drainage report for considerations for Protected Riparian Area in floodplain per TS Sec 4-03. This is a short report that identifies responsible party of maintenance and other basic characteristics for the project’s impact to riparian floodplain. Call to discuss. Call for expedited review for resubmittal. Please contact Elizabeth at 520-429-4905 if there are questions. |
||
| 12/18/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TD-DEV-0725-00192 Location: 8625 E PEMBROOK DR Review Date: 12/18/2025 Site Engineering Comments: 1. Address all of Floodplain Administration comments 2. As disturbance to possible Riparian Area appears to be minimal, an environmental resource report will not be required for submission If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/17/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bobby Parsons PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 8625 E Pembrook Dr. Tucson, AZ 85715 Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-0725-00192 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/17/2025 DUE DATE: 12/16/2025 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 30, 2026. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 1. Comment: As it appears proposed grading may extend beyond property lines, Site zoning is unable to approve this permit until you have satisfied all of the requirements from the Floodplain Administrator and Site Engineering. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |