Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0725-00189
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2025 | NPPO Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 08/19/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. See zoning comments Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/19/2025 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Site Landscape Comments: 1. Per Site Zoning, more information is needed to make a determination on the level of compliance that will be required for this development package. At the next submittal Site Landscape will provide full review comments. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/21/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Fernando Garcia PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Commercial Addition/Alteration 4660 E Speedway Bl, Tucson, AZ 85712 TD-DEV-0725-00189 (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 20, 2025 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Site Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 18, 2026. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0725-00189, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – This parcel is part of a larger shopping center that extends to the west and with whom it shared both access and parking. As such, this parcel and the adjoining two parcels to the west (126-02-0020 and 126-02-004A) are considered part of the same site. Provide calculations for this entire site. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Label the type of current use (per the UDC) in each suite within the overall shopping center. For vacant suites, utilize a general “Retail Use” designation. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 - 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Include a note stating “this project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R) given its frontage on both E Speedway Bl and N Swan Rd. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide floor area for each building, and each separate suite within each building, to include the buildings on the two parcels to the west. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – E Speedway Bl and N Swan Rd in this section are both proposed for a future width of 120’; E Speedway Bl is currently 100’ and N Swan Rd is currently 95’. Draw, dimension, and label the future right-of-way on the site plan. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide the width of the PAAL in the southern parking area. Per UDC Table 7.4.6-1, a two-way PAAL which access 90-degree parking spaces must be at least 24’ wide. Provide the width of the PAAL in the northern parking area. Per UDC 7.4.6.F.4., a back-up spur must be provided at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. See the remainder of this section for back-up spur design requirements. Per UDC 7.4.6.K, an alley can not be used to maneuver into parking spaces for a non-residential use. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide motor vehicle parking space calculations for the entire site, as discussed beforehand. Although a shopping center parking calculation (1 space per 300 sf of gross floor area (GFA)) may be used for the site, any alcoholic beverage service (1 space per 50 sf GFA), food service (1 space per 100 sf GFA), or entertainment (1 space per 5 fixed seats or 1 space per 50 sf GFA) must be parked separately, at their own rate, and not use the shopping center calculation. Per UDC 7.4.6.d.2.b, when a parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches (like a wall, fence, or other obstruction), the parking space must have a minimum width of 10’. The two parking spaces in the southern parking area immediately adjacent to the building do not meet this requirement. Provide a typical and accessible parking space detail. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide bicycle vehicle parking space calculations for the entire site, as discussed beforehand. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Site Zoning Reviewer Fernando Garcia at fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 07/18/2025 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/24/2025 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | EXTERNAL REVIEWERS CDRC added SWG USPS, and PAG to the workflow. FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG. |
||
| 08/14/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/24/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. |
||
| 07/24/2025 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. |
||
| 07/24/2025 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. |
||
| 08/11/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/23/2025 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/22/2025 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/20/2025 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Recommended to replace pavement in the public ROW sidewalk area. Existing slopes and cracks are not ADA complaint. Owner is responsible for maintaining abutting sidewalk in the ROW. |