Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.5
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0725-00179
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.5
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/17/2026 | NPPO Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 03/26/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 04/17/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 04/07/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Finish adding the location and size of the public sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number to sheets CG-05 and CG-06. [Second Comment: Drawings for the Tucson Auto Mall Sewerage System can be found at: https://onbase.pima.gov/publicaccess/WW_NextGen_Single/etc/cq/results.html?cqid=161&OBKey__157_1=G%2D86%2D023 ] [Initial comment: Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information: The location and size of the public sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) Reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.] 2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (4664-08, 2303.52’) is higher than the first floor elevation of the service building (2302.98’). Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson [Second comment: Answer pending][Initial comment: Determine the need for backwater valves per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 3. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole from the connection of the building sewer for the proposed Honda showroom 4664-09). Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. If it is your intent to use the civil plans from the development plan for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the buildings, building sewers, etc.). Revise the civil plans to provide complete installation drawings of the site utilities. Reference: Sections 107.2.1 and 107.2.6, IBC 2018. If you have any questions about this review comment, I can be reached at Robert.Sherry@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/20/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Loran Shamis PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 835 W Automall Drive – remodel/expansion used car Showroom and Service Building 810 W Automall Drive – demolition/reconstruct new Honda Showroom and Service Drive Development Package (3rd Review) TD-DEV-0725-00179 (835 and 810 W Auto Mall Dr) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 20, 2026 DUE DATE: April 15, 2026 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 16, 2026. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Ensure the Proposed Gross Floor Area in the Site Information is consistent with the square footage stated in the building footprint on the site plan. Within the Site Information, Lot 14 (Service Building) states the proposed GFA is 37,350 square feet the site plan on Sheet 10 states the proposed GFA is 37,422 square feet. Additionally, the parking calculation states the Service Building is 37,422 square feet plus 3,815 square feet for the Carwash, resulting in a total proposed GFA of 41,237 square feet. Ensure all notes are consistent. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.G - If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. The parking calculations for each phase do not appear to be correct. The parking calculations must include the square footage for each use that will exist during each phase to demonstrate compliance with the minimum parking requirement. For example, the Phase 1 and Phase 2 parking calculation must include the entire Showroom square footage remaining during Phase 1 and 2 in the parking calculation. The parking calculation on Sheet 5 only accounts for 23,350 square feet of gross floor area but, until it is demolished in Phase 3, must include the 27,960 square feet of gross floor area for the Showroom. The total parking space that should be available to the public for this phase of development is 104 parking spaces. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Update the parking calculations in accordance to COMMENT 1 requesting clarification on the total proposed gross floor area of the Service Building. According to the parking calculations, the proposal includes 3,815 square feet beyond the proposed 37,422 square feet of gross floor area. Ensure the notes, the parking calculation and the site plan state consistent gross floor area for the service building. 4. COMMENT: Per UDC 7.4.6.C, parking spaces used for storage or display of vehicles for sale or rent to the public are not counted towards required parking. Based on the site plan on Sheet 10, it appears 180 parking spaces are available for the proposed uses aside from inventory display. The minimum parking requirement must be available to the public, anything beyond the minimum required parking may be used for inventory display. 5. COMMENT: Per UDC 7.4.6.B.3 – Tandem Parking for motor vehicles are only allowed for vehicle storage or display when accessory to the principal use. Demonstrate the parking spaces designed as tandem parking are excess parking spaces beyond what is required for the minimum parking. It appears there are 6 parking spaces that are proposed tandem parking on the northwest side of the Service Building. Until the minimum parking requirement is demonstrated as available to the public, tandem parking can only accommodate excess parking spaces. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Loran Shamis by email Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pd |