Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0724-00220
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/09/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 09/10/2024 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 09/30/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 08/26/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0724-00220 • 2308 S CRAYCROFT RD 1. Revise drawing to indicate that the driveway aprons will be reconstructed to current PAG Standard Detail 206 and that any sections of sidewalk that broken or has a cross slope greater than 2% will be replaced. 2. Provide a general note indicating that all offsite improvements will require a separate Right-of-Way use permit. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at 520-403-0970 or email arnold.leigh@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 09/09/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide spot elevations to show that runoff will drain towards and enter the proposed curb cuts. 2. Provide dimensions for PAALs, parking spaces, ADA clear space, and sidewalks. 3. Provide waste stream calculations per TSM Section 8 and justify the size of the proposed waste enclosure. The proposed enclosure is not standard and will require approval from ES. Contact Andy Vera at andy.vera@tucsonaz.gov for approval. 4. Show locations of roof downspouts. Stormwater from roof drains may not pass over ADA sidewalks per TSM 7-01.4.3E. 5. Clarify the new impervious area/new site coverage calculations. If 2,790 square feet of additional pavement are proposed, please show that the depressed landscape areas have the capacity to retain 116 cubic feet of runoff. 6. Per TSM Section 10, show the height of the ramp landings and ensure that the rise for each ramp does not exceed 30 inches. Add handrail specs. The height of the top of the handrails will be between 30 inches and 34 inches from the surface and if the handrails are constructed of metal, the top railing will be covered with a non-heat-conducting material. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 09/10/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW CAR SALES CENTER PLACED ON AN EXISTING SMALL VACANT PARCEL ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0724-00220 ADDRESS: 2308 S CRAYCROFT RD ZONING: C-2 COMMERCIAL ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0724-00220, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. Add reference to the civil grading plans and details for curb cut construction. 4. The landscape plan calls out curb cuts at the planting areas and should be depressed 6 to 9 inches for rainwater harvesting. Please label the landscape areas as depressed 6 to 9 inches and refer to the civil grading plan for contouring and spot elevations for construction. 5. A detail showing the landscape areas as depressed will be helpful for the contractor during construction. This is not a requirement, just a recommendation. 6. Typically, street landscape borders are broken up and calculated as separate borders when driveway curb cuts bisect the border. Can an additional tree be added to the northeast street landscape border along Craycroft Rd? It is recognized that the border is only 35 linear feet, but it technically requires just over one tree (rounded up to 2). 7. Label sight visibility triangles on all landscape sheets. 8. Please label all the project property lines on all the landscape sheets. 9. The irrigation plan refers to the Water Plans for meter location coordination. Water plans have not been provided within the submittal of your development package. Please coordinate the meter/waterline locations with the civil utility plans. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov, or at 520.837.4923 |
||
| 09/05/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: All Models Cars & Trucks Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0724-00220 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 5, 2024 DUE DATE: September 6, 2024 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 8, 2025. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.5 – Remove the old “DEVELOPMENT PACKKAGE PDSD APPROVAL” stamp from the plans a an electronic stamp will be affixed to the plans once approved. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the owner listed on the cover sheet and provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the landscape architect that prepared the development package documents on the right half of the cover sheet. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The page number on sheet 2 is not correct, no page number and total number of pages were provided on sheet 3, the page numbers and total number of pages provided on sheet 4-6 are not correct and no page number and total number of pages was provided on sheet 7. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0724-00220, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The section numbers listed north of 22nd Street are not correct. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide a general note identifying the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. The use listed under ‘PROJEC DECRIPTION & INFORMATION” is not correct and the appliable Use Specific Standards were not provided, see UDC Table 4.8-4. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Craycroft Rd is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove all references to coverage as it is not applicable for this use in the C-2 Zone, UDC Table 6.3-4.A. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Craycroft Rd. dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - Sheet 1 under “ZONING INFORMATION’ you list “R-1 ZONING : 0.011 % OR 3.32 SF”. Clearly show this R-1 zoned area on the plan. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the zoning for the parcel to the south. Also the use listed for this parcel is not correct and should be parks and recreation. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – There is a “SECURTY GATE AND FENCE” shown on the plan that runs along Craycroft Rd. Clearly demonstrate that a vehicle attempting to access the site can turn around and drive out on to Craycroft without backing into the right-of- way if the gate is closed. All maneuvering must be on site. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The required number of vehicle parking spaces is not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.3. g and provide the correct required number. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a standard & accessible vehicle parking space detail. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide an accessible vehicle parking space sign detail. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking space calculation shall include the number of van accessible parking spaces required and provided. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Clearly demonstrate how parking vehicles will be prevented from overhanging the property line and damaging the fence shown along the south property line, UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Clearly demonstrate how a parking vehicle will be prevented from overhanging the stripped area along the north end of the accessible parking space. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- and long-term bicycle parking space calculation that provides the number required and provided. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for both short- and long-term bicycle parking that clearly shows how all requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – Show the future sidewalk and curb fulling dimensioned on the plan. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The setback dimensions show for the south and west property lines are not correct. Review UDC Table 6.3-4.A, C-2 zone, Nonres Use to a Res Zone and provided the correct required setbacks. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height for the proposed “NEW MODULAR OFFICE” within the footprint on the plan. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks and stripped pedestrian ways shown on the plan. 27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A provide a sidewalk out from the proposed modular to the street sidewalk. 28. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.2 are met for all sidewalks shown on the plan. 29. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 sections 405.3, 405.5, 405.6, 405.7, 405.8 & 505 are met. 30. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also, provide a general note stating all signage requires separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 07/30/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/16/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/16/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/16/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 09/30/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | September 30, 2024 WO#T125755 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: All Models Cars & Trucks New Sales Lot TD-DEV-0724-00220 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 8/16/2024. There are exisitng facilities within the development which are depicted upon the plan; however, there are possible conflicts with 3Ø Lines. Possible relocation required. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Martin Salazar (520) 305-6713 msalazar@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 08/16/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/29/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/06/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/09/2024 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |