Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0724-00208
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 08/19/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | APPROVED | 4350 E. Irvington Road Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 August 15, 2024 WO#T124514 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Oracle Dispensary TD-DEV-0724-00208 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 7/31/2024. There are existing facilities within the development which are depicted upon the plan. Please note recorded instruments for existing depicted facilities on Book 8251 Page 1834. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Chuck Leon (520) 400-6133 cleon@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 08/20/2024 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 08/06/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | DTM has no comments. | ||
| 08/28/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 08/23/2024 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good Afternoon, ADOT accepts this DEV. The Devloper/Owner will need to submit an ADOT Encroachment Permit for work within ADOT R/W. Please contact southcentralpermit@azdot.gov. Additional information is online Encroachment Permits | Department of Transportation Thank you for the opportunity to review. |
||
| 08/16/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Show dimensions for new ADA parking spaces and ensure compliance with ADA regulations. 2. Show slopes and cross-slopes for ADA accessible routes and ensure compliance with ADA regulations, including a minimum 4-ft unobstructed width along the route. Please highlight the location of the route on one of the plan sheets. 3. Show drive-through setbacks on the plans. 8. Per UDC 7.4.6.F.2 access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least one foot from open structures, or structures when serving as a drive-through lane, and at least two feet from a wall or obstruction over 6 inches. 4. If there is a clearance limit in the drive-through, please provide the clearance height. 5. Only one of the two new trash enclosures shows the slope of the slab and apron on the grading plan. Please include slopes on both new enclosures on the plans and ensure a minimum 1% slope for the slab and 2% slope for the apron per TSM 8. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/20/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: ADDITION OF DRIVE-THRU LANE TO EXISTING BUILDING ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0724-00208 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 3906 N ORACLE RD/10602011F ZONING: C-2 COMMERCIAL ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0724-00208, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. The rock weir notes and callouts on sheets 7 and 9 refer to detail 5 on sheet 10. Adjust the notes to see detail 5 on sheet 11. 4. Although I do like the idea of hydroseeding in the WHIA’s, if the hydroseed doesn’t take, the basins will be bare soil and possibly an opportunity for noxious weeds to take over. Would the removal of the hydroseed callout be okay? My thought is that the proposed trees, shrubs and screened decorative rock will look and function better than the hydroseed. 5. It looks like there are a couple of trees within 5 feet of sidewalk or curb. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for trees located near hardscape areas. See Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects 6. Some landscape contractors have been overlooking the intent of the tree locations within the WHIA’s. I have been recommending the addition of a rainwater harvesting basin schematic detail to the CRWHP for redundant clarity. Not required. There have been several cases on projects where the trees are not located within the basin. If you would like to add the detail and need an example, please reach out and I will send you a copy for reference. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov, or at 520.837.4923 |
||
| 08/28/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Fernando García PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 3906 N Oracle Rd, Suite #110, Tucson, AZ 85705 Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0724-00208 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 28, 2024 DUE DATE: August 15, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 15, 2025. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0724-00208, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – In general note 3, indicate that general merchandise sales (which includes commercial shopping center) is subject to use-specific standard 4.9.9.B.1. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – This information is not shown. Provide this information on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – This information is not shown. Provide this information on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – The Special Exception submittal indicated that this project would be phased. If this is the case, adjust calculations by phase. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.G - If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.G - The Special Exception submittal indicated that this project would be phased. If this is the case, show phasing as indicated above on plans. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Indicate width of drive-thru lane both outside and within building footprint. Per UDC Section 7.4.6.F.2., the drive-thru lane must be setback at least one from a structure. Indicate compliance with this requirement on plans. Note 20 indicates that a clearance bar will be installed at 8’ 6” above finished grade. Per UDC Section 7.4.6.E.2, indicate clearance for drive-thru lane within the building footprint. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Show full dimensions of loading zone in compliance with UDC Section 7.5.4.G. and Table 7.5.5-A. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clarify bicycle parking calculations. Are calculations on the submitted plans for all uses on the parcel (shopping center and dispensary)? Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1, the required number of bicycle parking spaces for multiple or mixed use development composed of more than one building are calculated on a per building basis using the formulas provided above. Following this guidance, Building 3, which includes the dispensary, is calculated to be 18,936 sf. This equates to four required short-term bicycle spaces and two required long-term bicycle spaces. General note 14 indicates that only two short-term bicycle spaces are provided. Indicate how the full requirement for Building 3 is being met. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Specific use proposed is not indicated for each building or suite within the development. At minimum, provide specific use for each suite within Building 3, including any existing uses. Per use-specific standard 4.9.9.E.1 and TP-ENT-0623-00028, the dispensary is limited to 10,000 sf of floor area. The suite immediately to the right of the proposed drive-through appears to be a storage area. Clarify the uses of this suite and the endcap suite. Provide a general note that no other suite in Building 3 will serve as additional floor area for the dispensary. Provide individual floor areas for each suite within Building 3. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S – Pedestrian circulation is required to all trash enclosures. No pedestrian circulation is indicated to the northeastern trash enclosure. Show on resubmitted plans. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Indicate proposed location of menu/order board within the drive through and its setback from the drive through lane. Per UDC Section 7.4.6.F.2, the drive-thru lane must be set back at least two feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches (this would include the menu/order board). COMMENT: Per use-specific standard 4.9.9.E.1, an odor-mitigation plan should accompany any related building permit for the dispensary. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Fernando Garcia by email at fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4989. Provide notice of resubmission by email to provide a faster review. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 07/15/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/31/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added ADOT, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to ADOT and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 07/31/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/31/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/31/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/13/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/26/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/23/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/13/2024 | Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | TIA has been reviewed. No further comments. |