Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0724-00192
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 08/07/2024 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 07/22/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 08/07/2024 | Site Landscape | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 09/11/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/11/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TEP review has not been received, reminders have been sent requesting TEP's response comments. Will place a "Requires Resubmit" status, so that the permit moves forward and allow customer to resubmit and address other comments. However TEP approval is still required and will be required for the next review cycle. | ||
| 08/05/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | see zoning comments | ||
| 08/01/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Twice the Ice - 9101 E 22ND ST Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0724-00192 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 1, 2024 DUE DATE: August 3, 2024 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is July 10, 2025. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.7 – The provide location map shown is not for this area. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.8 – Clarify what the two (2) north arrows are for that are located in the upper right corner of sheet 1 as there are no plans on this sheet. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0724-00192, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Under Zoning and Land Use note 4 & 5 you list Automotive Minor or Major Service and Repair, excluding bodywork and paint booths, subject to use specific standards 4.9.4.F.2, .3, .4, & .5 and 4.9.13.O. Automotive Major Service and Repair in not an allowed use in the zone therefor this site is considered nonconforming for the use. The use specific standards listed only apply to the Automotive Minor use as a special exception. The existing use should be listed as Automotive Major Service and Repair a nonconforming use with no use specific standards. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Under the vehicle parking space calculation you list Automotive Storage as a use but it is not listed under Zoning and Land Use note 4 & 5. Is this a use on site. Commercial Storage is not an allowed use in the C-1 Zone. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building are expansion calculation on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 5 is addressed Zoning cannot verify vehicle parking requirements. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a bicycle parking calculation on the plan. At a minimum Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1 Retail Trade Use Group 2 short-term and 2 long-term bicycle parking spaces are required for the kiosk (UDC Article 7.4.3.E.1). If you propose to use existing on site bike parking demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street setbacks listed under Development Package Calculation note 4 and under Development Plan Keynote 17 for 21st Street and Gollob Road are not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b and show the correct setback. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b the required street perimeter yard setback from the proposed kiosk to the Gollob Rd. property line is 20’-0”, proposed setback is 10’-0”. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications/Zoning-Administration. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Wyatt Berger at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A provide a sidewalk from the proposed kiosk to all streets that have frontage on this site, (TSM Section 7-01.2.B.1) Additional Comments 12. COMMENT: Clarify what Zoning and Land Use note 7 is for. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 07/03/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/12/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TEP, PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TEP. FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 07/12/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/12/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/12/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/01/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/09/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/11/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |