Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0723-00336
Parcel: 10604039A

Address:
340 E PRINCE RD

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0723-00336
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/07/2023 Commercial Plumbing APPROVED
08/22/2023 NPPO APPROVED
09/07/2023 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
08/04/2023 Fire New Construction REQUIRES RESUBMIT -Entrance drive shall be 20' wide for fire dept access per IFC 503.2.1

john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov
5203495581
09/06/2023 ROW Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT TD-DEV-0723-00336 (340 E PRINCE RD TUCSON, AZ 85705)

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed.

Comments:

1. Show the future ROW on the site plan.
2. Required improvements like required parking and required stormwater retention and detention basins cannot be located in the future ROW.
3. A pedestrian connection is required from the building to the sidewalk along Prince Rd.
4. P. A. G. SD 207, ICC 117.1 Sec 405.7 - Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required with a maximum 2% cross slope. Please identify this landing with dimensions and specifications with a callout.
5. Current zoning is C-2, not C-1 as indicated on the grading plan. Adjacent properties to the west are also C-2.
6. Dimension the existing sidewalk in the ROW on the site plan.
7. If the existing sidewalk is 4’ or greater in width and is in good condition, it can remain. If it is smaller than 4’ in width, it will need to be replaced with 6’ wide sidewalk.
8. 10-01.4.1.D When the existing sidewalk crosses the existing driveway apron, the sidewalk’s cross slope cannot exceed 2%. Consult TSM 10-01.4.1.D.1 and Tucson Street Design Guide page 3-15 for design alternatives.
9. New driveway apron is required per P. A. G. SD 206. Please call out the detail number in on plans.

Faffs Riederer
Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov

Abbreviations: City of Tucson Code (COTC), Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM), Technical Standards Manual (TSM), Street Design Guide (SDG), Pima Association of Governments Standard Details (P. A. G. SD), Access Management Guidelines (AMG), Major Streets and Routes Plan (MS&R).
08/18/2023 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview
The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
TD-DEV-0723-00336
1. The drainage report indicates that post-development peak storm water discharge is increased compared to pre-development discharge. The site is located in a critical basin and therefore post-development 2-, 10-, and 100-year discharge from the site must be reduced by 15%. Provide PC-Hydro sheets that show the reduction in discharge from the proposed basin.
2. First flush retention per Section 2 of the Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required on the site. Provide figures similar to Table 2.2 and 2.3 in the Detention and Retention manual to show that first flush retention is being provided.
3. Provide a reference for each basin with their corresponding basin plan names: Basin A -> TE-BAS-0823-00139
4. Pedestrian circulation is required from the modular unit to the sidewalk along Prince Road.
5. Provide waste stream calculations compliant with TSM 8-01.8 for the office. Show the location of the solid waste enclosure.
6. Maximize water harvesting to all required landscaping through use of flush curbs and curb cuts.
7. Wheel stops or curb will be required in the parking spots to the east and west of the property to prevent hitting the fence.
8. Curbs or another type of barrier will be required between the proposed pond and the parking and access lane to prevent cars from driving into the basin.

Lianne Evans
lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov
08/22/2023 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0723-00336
PROJECT: PROPOSED USED CAR LOT
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 340 E PRINCE RD/106-04-039A
ZONING: C-2

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

COMMENTS:
1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments, and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval.
2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0723-00336, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3
3. Label sight visibility triangles on all landscape/water harvesting/irrigation plans.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988
08/08/2023 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: 340 E. Prince Rd.
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0723-00336

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 8, 2023

DUE DATE: September 2, 2023

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is July 30, 2024.

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – Zoning and Land Use Note 14 lists incorrect references to code. Review the information found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Building-Safety/Building-Engineering-Codes, and provide the correct code references.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index shall include all sheets submitted.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email addresses and phone number for the Owner, Geotechnical Report and Landscape Architect list on sheet 1.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0723-00336, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 – The land use group, “COMMERCIAL” listed under Site Date is not correct and should be Retail.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Prince Rd. is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Prince Rd, existing right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Sheet C05 there is a “C-1” designation shown on the southern end of this parcel. It does not appear that this is correct.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of 7.4.6.H.1 are met for the following areas:
a. South of the retention basin.
b. Along the entrance access lane
c. To the east and west side of the propose building.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, Vehicle Sales and provide the correct calculation. The calculation shall include the number required and provided for both standard and accessible vehicle parking spaces.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly delineate the required and provided vehicle parking spaces from the vehicle display spaces. For your information vehicle display spaces are not required to be striped.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly demonstrate how parking vehicles will be prevented from extending beyond the property lines or damaging adjacent walls/fences, UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle parking space calculation shall include the number required and provided for both the short- & long-term bicycle parking spaces.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The provided short-term bicycle parking detail, sheet C07 does not address the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.d , .e, 7.4.9.B.2.f & .g.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The proposed long-term bicycle parking does not meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D.2, .3 or .5. For your information per UDC Article 7.4.8.B.1.a.(1) no long-term bicycle parking is required for a site where there is less than 2,500 square feet of gross floor area.

20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – It does not appear that Prince Rd. is at its full width. Show the future right-of-way (ROW) line along with future sidewalk and curb location, fully dimensioned. Reference the COT Major Streets and Routes plan & map found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Development-Tools-Resources/Plans#section-4. The site will need to be developed either meeting the future ROW requirements or a separate future site plan is required showing how the site will meet requirements when the street is widened. If you elect to go the route using a future site plan a Major Streets and Route covenant will need to be executed prior to approval of this plan. The covenant can be found at: https://tucson-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/georgia_pennington_tucsonaz_gov/ETOb-gOMEnhHiAQ_6aLmLE8BGC4Mb9rQtuGhjuSzvMZz6A?e=mraJf5.

21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The Perimeter Yard Setback listed under Site Date is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes-and-Plans/Zoning-Code, and provide the correct street permit yard setback.

22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The Height and Setback listed un under Site Date is not correct. There is no “TABLE 5.9.7” in the UDC. If you are referencing UDC Article 5.9.7 the setbacks listed only apply if this site were located in the Drachman School Overlay Zone (DSO).

23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height, and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building.

24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A is met.

25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.5 the accessible ramp show on the detail is not allowed within the access aisle.

26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter.
07/27/2023 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
07/31/2023 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED Added external reviewers, sent emails and sent FYI emails per SOP.
08/25/2023 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) REVIEW COMPLETED [EXTERNAL] Re: DUE SEPTEMBER 2, 2023 / Proposed Used Car Lot / TD-DEV-0723-00336

Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov>
CDRC
Good Afternoon,

ADOT has no comments on this DEV.

Thank you for the opportunity to review.
07/31/2023 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED Sent FYI emails per SOP.
07/31/2023 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED Sent FYI emails per SOP.
07/31/2023 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) REVIEW COMPLETED Sent FYI emails per SOP.
07/31/2023 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED Sent FYI emails per SOP.
07/28/2023 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
07/31/2023 OK to Submit - Landscape Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
07/28/2023 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED