Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0723-00323
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/27/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 12/10/2024 | TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | APPROVED | |||
| N/A | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/25/2024 | External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ES comments as follows: 1. Note proposed collection method. Refer to TSM 8-01.4.A & 8-01.8.0 2. Include provisions for both trash and recycling waste containers. Either provide one double container or two single container enclosures. TSM 8-01.5.1.A 3. Include enclosure detail with all dimensions. TSM 8-01.5.2 & 8-01.9.0 figure 3A & 3B 4. Include dimensions within turnaround and turning radii for service vehicle maneuvering. TSM8-01.5.3 & 8-01.9.0 figures 6 & 7 Feel free to contact me regarding my comments. Thanks, Andy Vera (520) 837-3798 Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/25/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0723-00323 V2 • 1937 E FORT LOWELL RD 1. The proposed basin outlet control structure is shown to be partially within the public rights-of-way. This structure needs to completely located outside of the ROW. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 12/03/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Please add all relevant calculations to Appendix F of the drainage report. There are calculation for 3 pipes. The site contains more than 3 pipes. The curb opening has been changed from 9 feet to 1 foot without any calculations provided. Please provide the curb opening calculation. 2. Thank for you clarifying the discrepancies with the ponding depths/WSEs. Please redo the water harvesting budget table using 0.75ft depth, the depth retained, for WHIA A and B. 3. See ROW Engineering comment RE: Basin outlet structure in ROW. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/11/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Richland Heights Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-0723-00323 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 11, 2024 DUE DATE: December 03, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06, and the Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year expiration date is July 27, 2024. 1. Remove the reference to “SECTION 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE” from the note shown on sheet C001 as it is not applicable. Zoning acknowledges that this comment had an error in it. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA FOR: UDC SECTION 5.4, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R); AND UDC SECTION 5.5, GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE.” 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Clearly demonstrate on the plan or detail how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, & 7.4.9.B.2.a are met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The proposed short-term bicycle parking facilities do not meet the requirements of UDC 7.4.9.B and .C. Demonstrate that the short-term bicycle parking facilities will comply with all of UDC 7.4.9.B. and .C. Provide a detail showing the short-term bicycle parking layout (see UDC Figure 7.4.9-C). 3. This comment was not fully addressed. As perimeter yard setbacks are based on a wall height measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A and wall height were not provided from design grade. Zoning has added 6” to the heights provided on the elevations. Sheet East A5 wall heights were not provided for the walls closest to the property line so perimeter yard setback requirements cannot be determined. Based the on a wall height of 21’-10” the required perimeter yard setback from the second level to the east property line is 16.375, proposed setback is 16.00. Sheet West A5 wall heights were not provided for the walls closest to the property line so perimeter yard setback requirements cannot be determined. Based the on a wall height of 25’-2” the required perimeter yard setback from the second level to the west property line is 18.75. No proposed setback was provided to the second level. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of each unit within the footprint of each unit to demonstrate the setback requirements will be met. Per UDC Table 6.3.3-A, when a non-residential use is adjacent to a residential or nonresidential zone, the required side and rear perimeter yard setbacks are ten feet or ¾ the height of the proposed exterior building wall, whichever is greater, measured from each interior property line. Design Development Option (DDO) is required to reduce a side or rear perimeter yard setback. 4. This comment was not addressed correctly. The crosswalk shown providing access to the trash enclosure may not encroach into the 20’ access lane. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Ensure a pedestrian circulation path connects to the bicycle parking area as well as to the trash enclosure (TSM 7-01.3.3.B). 5. Until the TSMR has been approved Zoning cannot approve this DP. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per Technical Standards Manual 7-01.4.1.F, sidewalks cannot be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space. A Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) is required to allow a sidewalk to be situated between a parking space and a PAAL. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 11/25/2024 | TSMR/PDMR - Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide and label the locations of the No Parking signage, 2 on each side of the PAAL equally spaced with at least one in the turn around area in the rear back where the trash enclosure is located. Note that the signage must have the 7 foot clearance below the sign to not encroach into the pedestrian path. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/01/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/21/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | November 21, 2024 WO#T84710 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: RICHLAND HEIGHTS TD-DEV-0723-00323 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 11/1/2024. Customer and contractor to verify the 10’ and 16’ set backs and overhead line clearances. Any pole or overhead line relocation will be 100% billable to the customer. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Chuck Leon (520) 400-6133 cleon@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 12/03/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED |