Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0723-00296
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/26/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/25/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide a reduced pressure zone backflow prevention assembly for the domestic water service. 2. Clarify the size of the building sewer and the proposed connection to the public sewer. The drawing shows it connecting to an “existing manhole” but the structure is actually an end of line cleanout. (8521*09) 3. Revise the site drawing to include the location, rim elevation of the next upstream manhole (8521-23). If the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12” below the first floor elevation, provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018 as amended by the City of Tucson. |
||
| 09/07/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Update aerial fire apparatus access road to comply with IFC, D105.4. (Palo Verde trees are an obstruction to aerial access) Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov / 520.837.7082 | ||
| 09/08/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 09/13/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf TD-DEV-0723-00296 1. Provide a table similar to Table 2.3 in the Stormwater Detention-Retention Manual to demonstrate that first flush requirements are being met. 2. From recent clarification from Environmental Services per TSM section 8, although recycling service isn’t required the site needs to provide at minimum the enclosure space for both solid waste and recycling. A single enclosure won’t be sufficient and a double enclosure or additional single enclosures will be needed to meet this requirement. 3. Provide a reference for each basin with their corresponding basin plan names: Basin -> TE-BAS-0923-00181. 4. Provide a site basin plan that shows the basin and the length, width, depth, slopes, and volume of the basin. A legible plan view and perpendicular section views at basin centerlines shall also be provided for all basins. 5. Show that sidewalks in front of parking spaces maintain a minimum 4 foot unobstructed width per TSM 7-01.4.3 A. The parking spots must have wheel stops or the sidewalk must be 6.5 feet in total width to ensure that vehicles do not obstruct the 4 foot width. 6. Show locations of roof downspouts. Stormwater from roof drains must be contained underneath the sidewalk through use of scuppers per TSM 7-01.4.3D. 7. Maximize water harvesting to landscaped and water harvesting areas through the use of curb cuts and flush curbs. Show the curb cuts on the drainage plan. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 09/08/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0723-00296 PROJECT: INDOOR STORAGE FACILITY ADDRESS/PARCEL: 320 S WILMOT ZONING: C-1 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments, and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Label sight visibility triangles and ROW’s (current and future) on all landscape, irrigation, and commercial rainwater harvesting plans. 3. Include irrigation maintenance notes. 4. Identfy the site monitor on the NPPO sheet. 5. Ensure the Grading Plan matches the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan & the Landscape Plan. 6. If using d.g at a 2” depth, ensure the rainwater harvesting basins are 8” in depth to account for the d.g. Then revise the Site Water Budget table to reflect these changes. 7. Show all downspouts/splash pads on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan. 8. Include directional arrows for all roofs on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 09/21/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Nathan Herrera Planner PROJECT: Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0723-00296 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 21, 2023 DUE DATE: September 23, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 24, 2024. 2-06.4.0 Content Requirements: 1. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: a. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description is to be provided. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description on each sheet per the above standard. 2. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile, and provide the following information: a. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. COMMENT: Identify the Alamo Wash to the north of the site on the project-location map. 3. 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." COMMENT: Existing zoning includes “Parking” zone. Add to note on Sheet 3. 4. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. COMMENT: The site is made up of two parcels, 128-02-138A & 128-01-011B, provide the square footage for each parcel per the above standard on Sheet 3. 5. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." COMMENT: Provide a note on Sheet 3 stating the proposed zoning, as stated in the rezoning case C9-22-07. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. COMMENT: List Use Specific Standards associated with the proposed use that are applicable in the C2 zone per UDC Article 4.8-4. 7. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: a. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building: COMMENT: Provide the Floor Area for the proposed building as a note on Sheet 3. See UDC Article 11.4.7 for definition of Floor Area. b. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; COMMENT: Provide a lot coverage calculation on Sheet 3 per the above standard. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions a. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. COMMENT: Provide the recordation information per the above standard for the “Trail Easement” shown on the Site Plan. b. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. COMMENT: Provide the information per the above standard for Park Place Dr. 8. 2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review. COMMENT: Per the City GIS Parcel Map, the 3 separate parcels (Parcels A,B,C) shown on plan set have been combined. Remove any reference to the separate parcels from the plan set. COMMENT: The site is made up of 2 parcels. Clearly identify the correct parcel lines throughout the plan set. 9. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. COMMENT: Identify the zoning classifications on the site and adjacent properties per the above standard on the Site Plan. 2-06.4.9.H Proposed Traffic Circulation 10. 2-06.4.9.H.1 – Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. COMMENT: PER TSM Section 10-01.3.3.D.4, “There will be a minimum of one-foot separation between the five-foot wide pedestrian circulation path portion of any sidewalk and any adjacent structure.” Show how the above requirement is being met on the Site Plan. 11. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1.a, “Barriers are not required to prevent vehicles from overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas when the sidewalk is curbed and the applicant can demonstrate that a clearance space of at least four feet in width is provided for pedestrian access. When demonstrating compliance, the applicant must account for a vehicle overhang of two and one-half feet. Show how proposed sidewalk maintains at least a 4’ width when accounting for a 2’ ½” overhang of the adjacent parking spaces. COMMENT: Per UDC Table 7.4.6-2, A one-way access lane within a storage use must have a minimum width of 20’. Provide a dimension for the access lane width for the access laned adjacent to the loading spaces provided on the Site Plan. COMMENT: Per UDC Table 7.4.6-2, A two-way access lane or PAAL within a storage use development must have a minimum width of 30’. The widths of the access lanes and PAALs shown on the Site Plan do not meet the required standard. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.G, “Parking spaces must be marked with a four-inch wide, white stripe along all sides, except at the entrance to the stall or where the limits of the space are defined by other means, such as curbing. Provide a dimension to the Parking Stall Detail on Sheet 8 that demonstrates compliance with the above standard. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H, “Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site”. The curbing provided at the northeast corner PAAL will have to continue along the length of the PAAL and tie into the existing curb as to not allow access to the east portion of the site. Barriers will need to be provided at the southeastern most PAAL of the site to prevent access on to the adjacent site to the east. 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.5.4.G.3, overhead clearance of a minimum of 15 feet is required for a loading zone. Add a note to the Site Plan to ensure compliance with the referenced standard. 13. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. COMMENT: Per UDC Table 6.3-4.A, the setbacks in the C-2 zone are 0’ for a non-residential use adjacent to a non-residential use. Change the note on Sheet 3 to reflect the correct setback standards. 14. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). COMMENT: Provide the height of the proposed building per the above standard. 15. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3, “Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required.” Provide a marked continuation of the sidewalk on the western and eastern side of the drive-thru area of the proposed building. 16. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. (label any new monumentation/if any). If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Nathan.Herrera@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4894. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: revised Development Package along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 09/26/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0723-00296 322 S. Wilmot Rd. Comments: 1. Any existing curb or sidewalk is non-compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards. 2. Both existing driveway aprons (ingress/ egress access off of Wilmot Rd) shall be reconstructed to P.A.G. standard 206 driveway aprons. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/24/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/06/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per SOP. | ||
| 09/06/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per SOP. | ||
| 09/06/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per SOP. | ||
| 09/06/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per SOP. | ||
| 09/06/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per SOP. | ||
| 08/25/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/05/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |