Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0626-00166
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/31/2026 | NPPO Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 07/13/2026 | Design Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Compliance with the Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) overlay zone is required. If the Downtown Infill Incentive District (IID) will be used, please request via TDC online a preapplication conference with the Design Professional and staff. A Design Package will need to be submitted as a subrecord of this Development Package, demonstrating compliance with RNA requirements, and also with IID requirements if the IID will be used, following these instructions: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/special_districts_application_instructions_7.18.23.pdf. Here's an overview of the RNA review process: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/rna-application-and-review-process.pdf. And here's an overview of the IID review process: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/iid-application-and-review-process.pdf . If you have any questions, please let me know: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you. | ||
| 07/21/2026 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The attached form will need to be filled out to determine whether a traffic impact study is needed for this development, and if so, to verify the preliminary assumptions. The completed form should be emailed to my primary inbox at rfreije@azdot.gov. Thanks, Rick Freije |
||
| 07/29/2026 | External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Keynote 13 on sheet 1 and keynotes 11 on sheets 6 & 7, identify the solid waste collection method as mini mac trash compactors, however, the waste stream calculations on sheet 1 proposes 1/8yd for trash and recycle services. Clarify what is being proposed and ensure it is annotated consistently within each keynote. 2. Must include provisions for both trash and recycle for any proposed service method. TSM 8-01.1.0 3. Include details, with all dimensions, of trash room/storage area along with complete dimensions of compactor equipment, if applicable, to demonstrate adequate space to support all equipment and maneuvering requirements. TSM 8-01.4.0.A 4. Call out path from trash room to container staging area and include dimensions. Feel free to contact me regarding these review comments. Andy Vera (520) 837-3798 Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/03/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Specifically call out the location of the fire dept aerial access. You can provide a separate sheet if you'd like. Must meet the requirements of IFC D105.1. Overhead obstructions in this area will be prohibited. -Sheet 11/11 states the proposed hydrant will be within 100' of the FDC. Please show the location of the FDC to verify hydrant location. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 07/30/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Provide Traffic Statement for new hotel. Provide Clearance letter from Park Tucson for removal of parking spaces on 5th Ave. Sidewalks on Tool ave and 5th ave shall be 6' wide min. Show street section for 5th Ave and Tool Ave. |
||
| 07/16/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0626-00166 (1st Review) Project: Development package for Moxy Hotel Location: 45 N 5TH AV Review Date: 7/10/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: TP-PRE-0126-00001 (PRE-App), TD-DIV-0426-00030 (Final Condo Plat), TC-COM-0626-00973 (Building Permit) Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Administrative Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0626-0016) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.3] 2. Revise General note #4: “This project is designed to meet the Overlay zone(s) criteria, UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R) and Rio Nuevo District.” [AM 2-06.4.7.A] 3. Provide the general note: “Retaining walls and/or screen walls referenced on this plan are to be designed by others. Elevations shown hereon are for reference only. The contractor shall confirm exact elevations. All retaining/structural walls and/or screen walls require a separate building permit and are not covered under the grading permit for this project’ a. Ensure to revise keynote #13 on sheet 6 to say – “Retaining wall to be built per separate building permit” 4. Site plan (sheet 2) - Revise the site plan provided to provide Sight visibility triangles for the intersection of Arizona Ave & Toole Ave, as well as for the parking garage entrance: Toole AV is designated as a Collector Road, 5th Street is designated as a minor/local road, and Arizona Ave is designated as a minor/local road. These designations will be used for Table 5.3. Refer to TSM 10-01.9.0 Figures 16-18 for examples of SVTs. [TSM 10-01.5.0.] a. Confirm that no proposed structures, walls, signs, landscaping, or other vertical elements exceeding the allowable height limit encroach within the established SVT at any site access point. Where conflicts exist, the site design must be revised to achieve full compliance. 5. Site plan – The plan sheet shows keynote #13 to designate the trash room, but no use of keynote is found on the site plan. Revise accordingly. 6. Provide keynotes and call-outs identifying all new structure downspouts and sidewalk scupper locations on the grading plan sheet. Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges up to and including a ten-year frequency flood event, and drainage flowing across any pedestrian circulation path shall be conveyed under the path for up to and including the ten-year frequency flood events [TSM 7-01.4.1.E and 7-01.4.3.E]. This information is required to demonstrate compliance and to ensure coordination with building permit plan review. 7. The new development includes providing dumpster roll-out service for adequate waste servicing from Waste Management. a. Environmental services approval will be required to accept that they will have no issues in regard to servicing this commercial property within this method. The contact to reach out to at ES will be Andy Vera at Andy.vera@tucsonaz.gov. Please submit the approval provided for the resubmission of this development package. b. If approval is given, ensure to be aware that this request will be managed as a TSMR which will require the submission of a Technical Standards Modification Request at time of resubmission of this development package. 8. Site Plan – Bollards at East Hotel Entrance a. Provide a keynote or call-out identifying the proposed bollards along the east hotel entrance. b. Dimension the spacing between bollards on the plan view and reference the spacing in the keynote to demonstrate compliance with the 4-foot minimum clear spacing requirement. 9. Site Plan / Grading Plan – Electrical Infrastructure at Northwest Corner a. Clarify whether bollards are proposed adjacent to the transformer, junction box, and generator at the northwest corner of the development. If bollards are proposed, revise the site plan and grading plan sheets to show their locations with keynotes or callouts, including spacing and setback dimensions from the equipment. |
||
| 07/31/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: MOXY HOTEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0626-00166 ADDRESS: 45 N 5TH AV ZONING: OFFICE/COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL ZONE (OCR-2); RIO NUEVO AREA; INFILL INCENTIVE DISTRICT LAND USE: COMMERCIAL HOTEL 7.31.2026 THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM). RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. The proposal is within the Rio Nuevo Area and opting into the Infill Incentive District. The development package shall include site landscape plans that include the requirements set forth in the Rio Nuevo Area and the Infill Incentive District. Include a summary breakdown of how the RNA and IID are met on the cover sheet of the landscape plans. Also include a shade study as part of the development package. See the following comments for guidance: 2. UDC 5.12.7 RIO NUEVO AREA (RNA) ZONING DESIGN STANDARDS: PLAZAS AND OPEN SPACE a. Plazas and Pedestrian Nodes *Five percent of the gross floor area of new construction shall be provided in public plazas or courtyards. Open space plazas, courtyards, and patios are landscaped outdoor areas designed to accommodate multiple uses, from large gatherings of the people for performing arts to smaller gatherings. The plazas and courtyards will be one of the ways that spaces and uses can be linked. The requirement of this section may be waived or reduced by the PDSD Director upon a written finding during the review process that the development enhances the downtown pedestrian environment even with a smaller percent or elimination of the requirement. b. VIEWSHED CORRIDORS Views of all historic properties and all natural elements surrounding the Downtown should be considered during design. Plazas, courtyards, and open spaces shall be sited to include views to other public spaces, where feasible. c. LINKAGES (PHYSICAL AND VISUAL) Neighborhood linkages shall be maintained throughout Downtown. 4.*STREETSCAPE a. Streetscapes must be consistent with the Streetscape Design Policy. In streetscape design, priority is given to pedestrians. b.*SHADE Shade shall be provided for at least 50 percent of all sidewalks and pedestrian pathways as measured at 12:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is 80° above the horizon (based on 32°N Latitude). Shade may be provided by arcades, canopies, or shade structures, provided they and their location and design characteristics are compatible with the prevailing and design context of the street and the architectural integrity of the building. Deciduous trees, as proposed in the Downtown Comprehensive Street Tree Plan, are encouraged to supplement existing evergreen trees. The use of plantings and shade structures in the City right-of-way are permitted to meet this standard with the approval of the Department of Transportation. The shade provided by a building may serve to meet this standard. 3. RNA DRB REVIEW: The Design Review Board (DRB) reviews all applications for compliance with the RNA standards in conjunction with the underlying zoning and makes findings and recommendations to the PDSD Director. 4. INFILL INCENTIVE DISTRICT - UDC 5.12.8 GENERAL IID ZONING OPTION DESIGN STANDARDS: An IID Plan under the IID zoning option design standards must demonstrate compliance with the following: 5. STREETSCAPE DESIGN - Streetscape design must comply with the street design standards in the Technical Manual and the Streetscape Design Policy. 6. PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTATION - Projects shall be pedestrian-oriented and comply with all of the following standards: a. New construction shall have architectural elements/details at the first two floor levels b. Buildings shall provide windows, window displays, or visible activity on the ground floor for at least 50 percent of frontage c. A single plane of façade shall be no longer than fifty feet without architectural detail d. Front doors shall be visible or identifiable from the street and visually highlighted by graphics, lighting, or similar features e. Uses that encourage street level pedestrian activity are preferred on the first floor of a structure of a multistory building. This may include, but is not limited to, Commercial Services, Retail Trade uses, etc.; It is encouraged to have a greater floor-to-floor height (14' recommended) for the first level than the floors above f. Construction and maintenance of sidewalks must be done in compliance with the City's Streetscape Design Policy. Existing sidewalk widths shall be maintained so as to provide effective, accessible, connectivity to adjoining properties. Sidewalks may be widened to accommodate a project's design characteristics. Where no sidewalks exist, sidewalks shall be provided. Outdoor seating and dining areas and landscaping may be located in the sidewalk area where safe and effective sidewalk width around the design feature can be provided g. To the extent practicable, bus pull-outs shall be provided where bus stops are currently located; and h. If drive-through service is proposed, it shall not interfere with pedestrian access to the site from the right-of-way 7. SHADE STANDARDS a. Except as provided below, shade shall be provided for at least 50% of all sidewalks and pedestrian access paths as measured at 12:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is 80 degrees above the horizon. Shade may be provided by trees, arcades, canopies, or shade structures provided their location and design characteristics are compatible with the historic and design context of the street and the architectural integrity of the building. The use of plantings and shade structures in the City right-of-way is permitted to meet this standard with the approval of the Transportation Department. The shade provided by a building may serve to meet this standard. 8. EXCEPTION The PDSD Director may approve an IID Plan providing less than 50% shade where compliance is not feasible due to a project site's location and/or building orientation and the applicant has made a reasonable attempt to comply with this standard. 9. Prior to site landscape approval, ensure that Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed. 10. Include the Activity Number TD-DEV-0626-00166 on all sheets in the plan set. THANK YOU. CHAD KELLER - PLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CITY OF TUCSON - PDSD CHAD.KELLER@TUCSONAZ.GOV |
||
| 07/30/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Jeffrey W. Cassidy, Planner Planning & Development Services Department – Current Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TD-DEV-0626-00166 – Commercial – Moxy Hotel 45 N 5TH AV TUCSON, AZ 85701 (OCR-2 Zoning) Development Package Review – 1st Review Related cases: TP-PRE-0126-00001 (PRE-App), TD-DIV-0426-00030 (Final Condo Plat), TC-COM-0626-00973 (Building Permit) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 30, 2026 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-8753 This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 26, 2027. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 1. COMMENT: Upon approval of TD-DIV-0426-00030, provide new legal description on sheet 1. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV -0626-00166 to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 3. COMMENT: Add general note(s) indicating that this development is subject to the Major Streets and Routes UDC 5.4 and Rio Nuevo UDC 5.12.7 and if Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District are applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project. 4. COMMENT: Provide related case TD-DIV-0426-00030 on all sheets in the lower right hand corner of sheet. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions 2-06.4.8.E – Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). 1. For land that slopes less than approximately 1%, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than one foot. Spot elevations shall be provided at all breaks in grade and along all drainage channels or swales and at selected points not more than 100 feet apart in all directions. 2. For land that slopes between approximately 1% and 5%, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than two feet. 5. COMMENT: Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC). 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 6. COMMENT: Revise the site plan provided to provide Sight visibility triangles for the intersection of Arizona Ave & Toole Ave, as well as for the parking garage entrance: Toole AV is designated as a Collector Road, 5th Street is designated as a minor/local road, and Arizona Ave is designated as a minor/local road. These designations will be used for Table 5.3. Refer to TSM 10-01.9.0 Figures 16-18 for examples of SVTs. [TSM 10-01.5.0.] Confirm that no proposed structures, walls, signs, landscaping, or other vertical elements exceeding the allowable height limit encroach within the established SVT at any site access point. Where conflicts exist, the site design must be revised to achieve full compliance. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 7. COMMENT: Provide a construction detail or PAG reference for proposed wheel stops. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 8. COMMENT: The Parking Calculations on sheet one indicate 188 spaces provided but sheet three indicates a total of 280 spaces. Update sheet one to represent the total provided on sheet three. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 9. COMMENT: While the bicycle parking indicated is correct in terms of the type, numbers and detail, the keynotes on the plan sheets do not acknowledge the location on the plans. Update plans to indicate where the short and long term locations will reside on the plan sheets. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 10. COMMENT: Provide missing sequence numbers for the proposed easements on sheet two. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 11. COMMENT: Per the TP-PRE-0126-00001 zoning review, it was stated there is 10’-0” setback E Toole Av and 20’-0” setback for N 5th Av. Sheet one and sheet two indicate 0’-0” setbacks suggesting these were reviewed and approved by the City. Indicate on sheet one, how this relief (what tool) was approved. Ie Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 12. COMMENT: The plan sheet shows keynote #13 to designate the trash room, but no use of keynote is found on the site plan. Revise accordingly. MISCELLANEOUS: 13. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other the PDSD reviewer comments. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: 14. COMMENT: Corrected Development Package permit 15. COMMENT: Provide a detailed response letter with your submittal that clearly shows how you have addressed all Zoning comments. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home . Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/old-pdfs/double-old/resubmittals.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov The Unified Development Code (UDC) can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes/Zoning-Code . |
||
| 06/30/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/09/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Addressing, Real Estate, Historic, Design Standards, Environmental and ADOT to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing. FYI email sent to TAA, TEP, SWG, USPS, PAG. | ||
| 07/30/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/15/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good afternoon, Pima County addressing approves TD-DEV-0626-00166. Once the record is paid the new address will be 75 N. 5th Av for the Moxy Hotel. Thank you, David Wilging Planner I - Addressing Division Pima County Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-724-6381 |
||
| 07/21/2026 | Historic | REVIEW COMPLETED | Project not in an HPZ, It is in the Downtown Tucson National Historic District. Basically, an IID project. Using the IID tool will trigger an historic review : 1 Tucson Pima County Historical Commission, Plans Review Subcommittee (PRS) a. An optional Courtesy Review prior to formal submission is available 2. PDSD Director issues Decision Notice granting either Historic approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval. 3. Full Reviews have a 14-day appeal period. Parties eligible to appeal the Director’s decision Contact: Michael.Taku@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/14/2026 | MITZ District Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/30/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/02/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/31/2026 | Real Estate Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | The Real Estate Division processed & completed an application for vacation of City right of way resulting in a deed creating parceled land from Toole Ave Right-of-Way recorded at Seq 20261910120. It appears Developer may need to process & record a Private Patio Easement fbo 1 N. 5th. Please contact the Real Estate Division if any other property rights need to be addressed (520)791-4148. | ||
| 08/03/2026 | Real Estate Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | The Real Estate Division processed an application for the vacation of a sliver of Toole Avenue rights-of-way. Please contact the Real Estate Division if any property rights remain to be addressed. 520-791-4181 |