Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0626-00162
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0626-00162 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 3305 N CARDI BL TUCSON, AZ 85716 Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review. If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov COMMENTS: 1. Please show the location and size of the proposed backflow preventer on the site plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2024. |
||
| 08/06/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0626-00162 (2nd Review) Project: Change of use. There will be a minor TI submitted once this is approved. Location: 3305 N CARDI BL Review Date: 8/6/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate & Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Remove all revision bubbling/clouding from the provided plan set - revision clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. |
||
| 08/27/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. COMMENT: Per conversation with applicant, this project will be resubmitted as a Community Corridors Tool (CCT) project, subject to UDC 5.11. Please provide a new general note indicating that this project is subject to UDC 5.11, Community Corridors Tool. 2. COMMENT: Perishable Goods Manufacturing for coffee roasting is not a permitted use in the C-1 zone. Please remove this as a use. 3. COMMENT: Include "Food Service, excluding soup kitchen" as a use in additional to the "General Merchandise Sales" use. 4. COMMENT: Provide updated calculations indicating the GFA dedicated to the retail and food services uses. 5. COMMENT: Dimension all exterior outdoor dining/serving areas and label as "Outdoor Dining/Service". Include this GFA as part of the calculation for "Food Service" in the GFA calculations and parking calculations table. 6. COMMENT: Provide a separate parking justification statement per UDC 5.11.6.G. 7. COMMENT: Indicate in the Comment Response Letter that you request this project to be reviewed as a Community Corridors Tool (CCT) project rather than through underlying zoning. 8. COMMENT: Provide a general note that per UDC 5.11.6.G.3.a.(2), the existing parking lot may remain without improvements. 9. COMMENT: Show compliance with 5.11.6.G.3.a.(6), providing either the required canopy trees or shade coverage for the parking spaces. 10. COMMENT: Provide a "public space" calculation that meets UDC 5.11.G.3.a.(1) that indicates that at least 500 sf serves as public space. Be aware that the current outdoor dining area may count in whole towards this requirement. 11. COMMENT: Remove clouds; for City of Tucson, clouding is only used during official revisions of already approved and issued plans. Contact Fernando Garcia, Lead Planner, and Jeffrey Cassidy, Planner, Site Zoning at fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov on resubmission of plans. |